SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

BRANNSTROM

Créé par: that_onehabsfan
Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 18 oct. 2023
Publié: 18 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
OTT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (MTL)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de MIN
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de SJS
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de DET
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2026
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $69 240 416 $1 170 000 $3 935 000 $14 259 584 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 985 000 $1 985 000 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
885 000 $885 000 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
828 333 $828 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
812 500 $812 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 oct. 2023 à 21 h 33
#1
Berkly goat Catton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,657
Mentions "j'aime": 2,240
That is a dumb idea. Brannstrom is **** on his offside and Barron will fill that spot. Also, no need for LHD
Campabee a aimé ceci.
19 oct. 2023 à 12 h 22
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
That is a dumb idea. Brannstrom is **** on his offside and Barron will fill that spot. Also, no need for LHD

Considering it hasn't been really tried in years, no way of knowing that

That said, I hope Dorion doesn't not do that. Brannstrom is needed and should only been traded in a better timing than now.

Kubalik is not needed with full as it is without even talking about Pinto not signed and Jarventie in the AHL. Plus, he'd clear 500 000$ more cap space than Brannstrom
19 oct. 2023 à 18 h 5
#3
Berkly goat Catton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,657
Mentions "j'aime": 2,240
Quoting: Xspyrit
Considering it hasn't been really tried in years, no way of knowing that

That said, I hope Dorion doesn't not do that. Brannstrom is needed and should only been traded in a better timing than now.

Kubalik is not needed with full as it is without even talking about Pinto not signed and Jarventie in the AHL. Plus, he'd clear 500 000$ more cap space than Brannstrom

There must be a reason if a team weak on RD doesn’t try a LD on his offside
20 oct. 2023 à 10 h 16
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
There must be a reason if a team weak on RD doesn’t try a LD on his offside

Zub is a good top-4 RHD, Hamonic is "ok" if on the 3rd pair... so they needed one Top-4 RHD

We all thought it would be Chychrun because he had NHL experience on that side but not sure how it ended up being Chabot lol.

There was a technical reason why they preferred to have Brannstrom on LD, and it was related to having to play more on his backhand. It makes sense because one of the best Brannstrom attributes is how fast he recovers the puck and moves it swiftly out of the D zone. having to use more his backhand diminishes that strength and hurts the team transition ability.
20 oct. 2023 à 17 h 20
#5
Berkly goat Catton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,657
Mentions "j'aime": 2,240
Quoting: Xspyrit
Zub is a good top-4 RHD, Hamonic is "ok" if on the 3rd pair... so they needed one Top-4 RHD

We all thought it would be Chychrun because he had NHL experience on that side but not sure how it ended up being Chabot lol.

There was a technical reason why they preferred to have Brannstrom on LD, and it was related to having to play more on his backhand. It makes sense because one of the best Brannstrom attributes is how fast he recovers the puck and moves it swiftly out of the D zone. having to use more his backhand diminishes that strength and hurts the team transition ability.


But they didn’t even try him. That says a lot
20 oct. 2023 à 18 h 56
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
Quoting: GuyGuyGuy
But they didn’t even try him. That says a lot

Yes they did, but not to try him, he played on the right when there was injuries. The site below keeps track of it but if you want to see past seasons you have to register

https://leftwinglock.com/players/index.php?p1=Erik%20Brannstrom&flag=y#:~:text=Erik%20Brannstrom%20is%205'%2010,after%20the%202023%2D2024%20season.
20 oct. 2023 à 19 h 13
#7
Berkly goat Catton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2023
Messages: 5,657
Mentions "j'aime": 2,240
Quoting: Xspyrit
Yes they did, but not to try him, he played on the right when there was injuries. The site below keeps track of it but if you want to see past seasons you have to register

https://leftwinglock.com/players/index.php?p1=Erik%20Brannstrom&flag=y#:~:text=Erik%20Brannstrom%20is%205'%2010,after%20the%202023%2D2024%20season.


Ok, so he played on his offside. Why are you saying ge didn’t?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage