SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline moves

Créé par: DrouinYermom
Équipe: 2023-24 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 5 sept. 2023
Publié: 5 sept. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
SEA
  1. Labanc, Kevin (2 362 500 $ retained)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VGK)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (VGK)
4.
SJS
  1. Campbell, Jack
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2026 (EDM)
5.
SJS
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2026 (WPG)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de SEA
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de NJD
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de VGK
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WSH
2026
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de EDM
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $66 875 001 $25 000 $850 000 $16 624 999 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 sept. 2023 à 23 h 14
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 824
Mentions "j'aime": 310
The Sharks do all of these, but no chance anyone (except maybe the Duclair one) are reasonable for the other team. Labanc has next to no value even with retention, Barabonov is worth a 2nd + something small, Kahkonnen+Lindblom have negative value, and Hoffman isn't really worth anything either.
6 sept. 2023 à 1 h 5
#2
RecycleShark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2023
Messages: 1,024
Mentions "j'aime": 293
It will all depend on the seasins they have.

Duclair for a 2nd seems probable

Barabanov is only worth one 2nd

Edmonton might give the Sharks a 2nd or 1st to take Campbell. If Kahkonen rebounds he could add value to that trade and provide Edmonton with a shorter term / lower cost backup.

I doubt Edmonton would want Linblom thrown in.

Hard to say on Labanc and Hoffman. Retain on whichever one has the best year. A club that needs pp help might give a 4th - 7th.

Overall this post looks good. Other than being too high on Barabanov.

It will be interesting to see if the Sharks trade Granlund or Rutta this year even though they have two years left on their contracts.
sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
6 sept. 2023 à 7 h 21
#3
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,803
Mentions "j'aime": 567
Quoting: Waffelz
The Sharks do all of these, but no chance anyone (except maybe the Duclair one) are reasonable for the other team. Labanc has next to no value even with retention, Barabonov is worth a 2nd + something small, Kahkonnen+Lindblom have negative value, and Hoffman isn't really worth anything either.


Labanc does have value and good analytics, and with retention contract he's worth though im not sure hes someone the sharks should be using that last slot on. I wouldn't want to deal with Vegas under any circumstances after the hill deal lol. Kahk & Lindblom have negative value but not as negative a value as Jack Campbell
6 sept. 2023 à 10 h 20
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 184
Mentions "j'aime": 72
Mike Grier likely doesn't want to take on a 4x5 contract at the deadline, even for a 1st round pick, when his whole MO with the Karlsson trade was cap flexibility.
6 sept. 2023 à 10 h 47
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,124
Mentions "j'aime": 7,781
What is Edmonton paying a 1st + 3rd for? You aren't offering them any cap savings this year, in fact they're taking on an additional $250k. Why would they ever make a move like that midseason?
6 sept. 2023 à 18 h 23
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 99
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: Waffelz
The Sharks do all of these, but no chance anyone (except maybe the Duclair one) are reasonable for the other team. Labanc has next to no value even with retention, Barabonov is worth a 2nd + something small, Kahkonnen+Lindblom have negative value, and Hoffman isn't really worth anything either.


Terrible take.

Labanc is still a middle-6 winger with offensive upside, at 50% retention it makes him a lot closer to his market value (even below it).
Barabanov is a steal at his salary even without any retention and can easily slot into any team's top-6 at any role. A Hyman-type player.
No **** that Lindblom + Kahkonen have negative value, but that's kind of the point here (to offset Campbell salary for at least 1 season).
Hoffman isn't really worth nothing which is why I put him as being moved for a 7th.
9 sept. 2023 à 22 h 34
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 824
Mentions "j'aime": 310
Quoting: JoeThornton
Terrible take.

Labanc is still a middle-6 winger with offensive upside, at 50% retention it makes him a lot closer to his market value (even below it).
Barabanov is a steal at his salary even without any retention and can easily slot into any team's top-6 at any role. A Hyman-type player.
No **** that Lindblom + Kahkonen have negative value, but that's kind of the point here (to offset Campbell salary for at least 1 season).
Hoffman isn't really worth nothing which is why I put him as being moved for a 7th.


Kevin Labanc was healthy scratched multiple times last year, and put up roughly .5p/gp while being absolutely terrible on defense, and having one of the worst penalty differentials in the league. All that for the low-low price of $4.7m/yr, or 2$2.35m with 50% retained. I'm not sure he would even get a 7th with retention, let alone more.

Barabonov is absolutely a steal at his salary, but I think his value is closer to a single 2nd rounder if there isn't any money being retained. If there end up being multiple teams trying to go after him at the deadline, I could see the price going up.

I don't see the Oilers doing that deal unless Campbell is even worse this year than he was last year, and Kahkonnen shows some actual signs of improvement (Or the Oilers go out and aquire an actual #1 goaltender). The Oilers would effectively be making themselves worse on paper all of a little bit of cap relief, which likely won't help them going into the playoffs.

Hoffman for a 7th is whatever, that's basically future considerations so a 7th is fine I guess.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage