SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Garland gone

Créé par: The_Rocket
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 20 août 2023
Publié: 21 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
CBJ
  1. Labanc, Kevin (1 765 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2026
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $79 599 167 $850 000 $850 000 $3 900 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 août 2023 à 0 h 5
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Why wouldn’t the sharks just go for Speke themselves if that’s all it takes?
21 août 2023 à 0 h 21
#2
Casual Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 738
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Caps don’t touch that. Kuznetsov is the much better player at the much more important position. Kuznetsov’s worst season is far better than Garland’s best and Kuznetsov doesn’t make nearly enough against the Salary Cap to justify trading him for a worse player at a position WSH doesn’t need while someone needs to play the offensive 1B/2A Center role while the Caps set Ovi up to chase the Goals record. WSH won’t be doing this.
21 août 2023 à 1 h 17
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 150
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Why wouldn’t the sharks just go for Speke themselves if that’s all it takes?


I don't know if retaining on Labanc and using up our last retention slot would be wise for a 3rd paid d-man in Peeke. Let's save that slot to acquire an asset like a 2nd or 1st at the TDL.
21 août 2023 à 3 h 10
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: goodaytoday
I don't know if retaining on Labanc and using up our last retention slot would be wise for a 3rd paid d-man in Peeke. Let's save that slot to acquire an asset like a 2nd or 1st at the TDL.


Peeke has good size and is still very young, I would take a flyer on him plus CBJ may be willing to opt for a pick rather than the retention!
goodaytoday a aimé ceci.
21 août 2023 à 4 h 55
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 150
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Peeke has good size and is still very young, I would take a flyer on him plus CBJ may be willing to opt for a pick rather than the retention!


He does have good size, and would easily lead our team in hits and blocked shots for years to come. What pick are you thinking? I don't think CBJ do it for anything less than a 3rd, and I'm not sure I would pay that. I would do a 4th all day with no retention though.
21 août 2023 à 5 h 3
#6
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 5,179
Mentions "j'aime": 2,293
I like Garland but kuznetsov is a better player. The value isn’t there for the caps.
21 août 2023 à 10 h 26
#7
Skip skibbity
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 2,260
Mentions "j'aime": 877
that's a negative for Washington
21 août 2023 à 10 h 47
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 1,013
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Peekes a good bet, would avoid Kuznetsov. Showing all the signs of a dramtic downturn.
21 août 2023 à 11 h 24
#9
not a he )
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 3,267
Mentions "j'aime": 4,473
Peeke's available, but Columbus has no interest in Labanc at all.
CBJ_Bob a aimé ceci.
21 août 2023 à 12 h 9
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: goodaytoday
He does have good size, and would easily lead our team in hits and blocked shots for years to come. What pick are you thinking? I don't think CBJ do it for anything less than a 3rd, and I'm not sure I would pay that. I would do a 4th all day with no retention though.


I was thinking a 4th but in this draft a 3rd would be fine honestly (weaker drafts like this one a 3rd is essentially a late 4th, plus sharks almost never hit in 3rds anyways just look at our draft history)
goodaytoday a aimé ceci.
21 août 2023 à 12 h 21
#11
Stovetop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 2,004
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Quoting: goodaytoday
I don't know if retaining on Labanc and using up our last retention slot would be wise for a 3rd paid d-man in Peeke. Let's save that slot to acquire an asset like a 2nd or 1st at the TDL.


Sharks could give up a 3rd/4th to a third team to retain. I'm sure a lot of our deadline deals will have part of the returns going to a 3rd team to retain
21 août 2023 à 12 h 40
#12
Indy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 381
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: goodaytoday
He does have good size, and would easily lead our team in hits and blocked shots for years to come. What pick are you thinking? I don't think CBJ do it for anything less than a 3rd, and I'm not sure I would pay that. I would do a 4th all day with no retention though.


He's a guy that at the trading deadline overpays could get you a mid/late 2nd but right now I can't see us moving him for less than a middle 3rd. He still has alot of value and honestly wouldn't be shocked if he's kept here over someone like Boqvist.
21 août 2023 à 18 h 53
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,284
Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
Quoting: Indy
He's a guy that at the trading deadline overpays could get you a mid/late 2nd but right now I can't see us moving him for less than a middle 3rd. He still has alot of value and honestly wouldn't be shocked if he's kept here over someone like Boqvist.


I was saying Labanc and a 3rd/4th. Felt that could be fair.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage