SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

DISSECTING THE KARLSSON TRADE

Créé par: Ennis
Équipe: 2023-24 Predators de Nashville
Date de création initiale: 6 août 2023
Publié: 6 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
NSH
    SAN JOSE:

    We all knew nobody was going to pay that albatross original asking price. We also knew he was asking high to start negotiations. But, damn, what a bad return.

    You moved EK with retention, took back three cap dumps, and all you got out of it was a late first? I would absolutely hate to see what his return would be if they decided to keep him for another year and trade him if his numbers dropped. Yeesh.

    San Jose's blueline is atrocious now (which is fine when you are 'rebuilding'). But it seems like Grier is allergic to puck movers? A D core full of big body DFD's but not a defenseman that can make an exit pass to save his life. And who in gods name is going to play the quarterback on a powerplay?

    Ferraro - Rutta
    Vlasic - Benning
    Simek - Knyzhov/Burroughs/MacDonald
    SJS
    2.
    NSH
      MONTREAL:

      A very weird team to be involved, and some head scratching Hughes decisions.

      Good on you for dumping Hoffman, but why bring Petry back? We know he's a "capable" defender, but Montreal already has a blueline STACKED with blooming young talent much more deserving of the ice time. You just clogged up the pipeline with an aging vet you did a good job getting rid of in the first place. I understand wanting to bring in vets for the young core, and Petry probably has a good relationship with the city (I'm guessing here?), but there are other options available.

      But hey, you got a late second in 2025, so that's good... I guess..
      MTL
      3.
      NSH
        PITTSBURGH:

        The clear winners of the trade. Getting EK at 10m, dumping Rutta and that brutal Granny contract, acquiring a depth player in Pitlick, and getting a 2026 3rd for a bit of retention.

        Dubas masterclass, and they should bounce right back into that wildcard spot if everyone can stay healthy.
        PIT
        Rachats de contrats
        Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
        Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
        2024
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de TBL
        Logo de WPG
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de DAL
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de CHI
        Logo de EDM
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de DAL
        2025
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de TBL
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de NSH
        2026
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de NSH
        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
        2283 500 000 $75 593 365 $0 $352 500 $7 906 635 $
        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        3 185 000 $3 185 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
        C
        UFA - 4
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        850 000 $850 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
        AG, C
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        2 857 143 $2 857 143 $
        C, AD
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        797 500 $797 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
        AD
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
        AG, AD
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
        C, AD
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        775 000 $775 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        775 000 $775 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
        C
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        800 000 $800 000 $
        C
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        775 000 $775 000 $
        C, AG
        UFA - 1
        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        9 059 000 $9 059 000 $
        DG
        NMC
        UFA - 5
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
        G
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
        DG
        NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
        G
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
        DG/DD
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 1
        Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
        Logo de Predators de Nashville
        8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
        AG
        NMC
        UFA - 7

        Code d'intégration

        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

        Texte intégré

        Cliquer pour surligner
        6 août 2023 à 15 h 5
        #51
        Evans truther
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2019
        Messages: 2,509
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,434
        Petry is 100% sure gone by the first puck drop and it has been reported by Eric Engels, his family would've never agreed to lift their NTC to come back here. Montreal's the only team here that doesn't have a negative side in this trade.

        There's two ways to look at the deal for San Jose;
        1: You've traded a Norris finalist for three cap dumps at a staggering price of a single protected first rounder.
        2: You've traded a 33 years old defender with an awful contract who, prior to this year, hasn't played a full 82 games schedule for six straight years and hasn't been a PPG player in those years either. Trading him gives you much better odds at finishing lower in the standings thus hitting a better prospect with your own future picks and the franchises has saved 17 millions dollars of real money by doing so. You don't care much about the return because you've cleared a problem for your rebuild.

        Dubas' betting big time that he traded for last year's Karlsson and not the previous six years of him, if he comes out of the gate by playing 50 games and scoring 40 points it's a big fat L on the Penguins. And his contract is pretty much buyout proof with his 11M$ during his final two years.
        vols94 a aimé ceci.
        6 août 2023 à 15 h 32
        #52
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2018
        Messages: 4,261
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,031
        Its not great for SJ now. Rutta can be moved. Hoffman can play on the PP and then get moved at the deadline. Granlund is a sunk cost. we will have 2 1st at least for a 2nd year in row and we only retained 1.5M on EK. the 10M in cleared cap space in 3 yrs is a win.
        6 août 2023 à 15 h 33
        #53
        sLIM
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2023
        Messages: 660
        Mentions "j'aime": 181
        Terrible analysis of mtls part. Their blue line is pretty brutal, petry instantly becomes their best RD and is easily tradable at a retained hit for even more assets. Say they move petry for a 2nd and 4th, this means they have bought 2 seconds and a goalie for nothing but the retention on petry, how is that perplexing
        6 août 2023 à 15 h 34
        #54
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mars 2017
        Messages: 24,124
        Mentions "j'aime": 7,781
        Quoting: edeangel84
        SJ will be getting a pick in the 18-22 range. That’s hardly bad when they just moved 40M in salary they didn’t need. We are not a contender and we need to stop pretending.

        Did they though?

        Karlsson is owed $39M over the next 4 years. San Jose retained 13%, or $5M. They took back 3 players: Hoffman ($5M), Granlund ($11M) and Rutta ($5M). This trade is costing them $26M in cash over the next 4 years.

        If they had simply retained 50% on Karlsson, that would have cost them $19.5M over the next 4 years. So this trade is NOT saving them money.

        Here's the other thing: what would the return have been if they had offered to retain 50%? I would think it would be significantly higher in terms of picks & prospects.

        Yes they do free up more cap space in year 3 and 4 doing it this way, but with the cap set to rise significantly and SJS not poised to come out of their rebuild any time soon, is this really any use to them?

        I don't see any way to couch this as a successful manoeuvr by Grier.
        Ennis a aimé ceci.
        6 août 2023 à 16 h 10
        #55
        JimmyPaek
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2019
        Messages: 4,023
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,191
        Quoting: CD282
        Did they though?

        Karlsson is owed $39M over the next 4 years. San Jose retained 13%, or $5M. They took back 3 players: Hoffman ($5M), Granlund ($11M) and Rutta ($5M). This trade is costing them $26M in cash over the next 4 years.

        If they had simply retained 50% on Karlsson, that would have cost them $19.5M over the next 4 years. So this trade is NOT saving them money.

        Here's the other thing: what would the return have been if they had offered to retain 50%? I would think it would be significantly higher in terms of picks & prospects.

        Yes they do free up more cap space in year 3 and 4 doing it this way, but with the cap set to rise significantly and SJS not poised to come out of their rebuild any time soon, is this really any use to them?

        I don't see any way to couch this as a successful manoeuvr by Grier.


        Hoffman is off the books next year. Rutta gets traded either at the TDL or next offseason. That leaves them with only Granlund. They’re playing long ball. Our first in 2024 probably ends up around 18-22. They’ll probably get a useful player.
        6 août 2023 à 16 h 11
        #56
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: oct. 2022
        Messages: 5,424
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,450
        Quoting: edeangel84
        Hoffman is off the books next year. Rutta gets traded either at the TDL or next offseason. That leaves them with only Granlund. They’re playing long ball. Our first in 2024 probably ends up around 18-22. They’ll probably get a useful player.


        That first will take 2-3 years before the player is even ready to start making an impact. Big deal. Grasping at straws here. You gave up nothing
        CD282 a aimé ceci.
        6 août 2023 à 16 h 20
        #57
        JimmyPaek
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2019
        Messages: 4,023
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,191
        Quoting: Ennis
        That first will take 2-3 years before the player is even ready to start making an impact. Big deal. Grasping at straws here. You gave up nothing


        Who cares? SJ is a rebuilding team. They have 2-3 years. We have two prospects worth anything in our whole system. That pick would have been the 3rd.
        6 août 2023 à 16 h 22
        #58
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: oct. 2022
        Messages: 5,424
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,450
        Quoting: edeangel84
        Who cares? SJ is a rebuilding team. They have 2-3 years. We have two prospects worth anything in our whole system. That pick would have been the 3rd.


        That's the case for most contending teams with no prospects lmao, at least you have two. Who cares if you gave up a mid/late first in this weaker class lol. Still grasping at straws.
        6 août 2023 à 16 h 27
        #59
        JimmyPaek
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2019
        Messages: 4,023
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,191
        Quoting: Ennis
        That's the case for most contending teams with no prospects lmao, at least you have two. Who cares if you gave up a mid/late first in this weaker class lol. Still grasping at straws.


        We aren’t a contending team though. That’s the entire point.
        6 août 2023 à 16 h 36
        #60
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: oct. 2022
        Messages: 5,424
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,450
        Quoting: edeangel84
        We aren’t a contending team though. That’s the entire point.


        You are as long as Geno, Guentzel, Letang, and Sid are on the team.
        6 août 2023 à 16 h 43
        #61
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mars 2017
        Messages: 24,124
        Mentions "j'aime": 7,781
        Quoting: edeangel84
        Hoffman is off the books next year.

        That's accounted for. Irrespective of the length of the contract, it's money spent that didn't have to be.

        Quoting: edeangel84
        Rutta gets traded either at the TDL or next offseason.

        Rutta has 2 more years left, he's unlikely to be traded at the deadline. GM's rarely want term attached, they're looking for rentals.

        If they move him in the offseason they'll save $2.5M (unless they take another player back), that doesn't bridge the gap between $19.5M and $26M.

        Quoting: edeangel84
        That leaves them with only Granlund. They’re playing long ball. Our first in 2024 probably ends up around 18-22. They’ll probably get a useful player.

        Eventually. But they could have got that AND MORE AND saved themselves millions of dollars if they had simply retained 50%.
        6 août 2023 à 17 h 20
        #62
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: nov. 2018
        Messages: 15,600
        Mentions "j'aime": 6,480
        Quoting: Ennis
        My comment on them taking back Petry was in the event that they decide to keep him for a year then flip him when he's expiring. Which, In my humble opinion, would suck considering they have all of that talent on the back end who should be playing instead. I also heard Petry was traded from MTL originally because he wanted out? I dunno if that's what happened but that's why I was confused.

        If they can find a suitor to take Petry before the season starts, it's a win.


        Petry wanted to be closer to family due time the Canadian boarder restrictions during covid. So yes he requested a trade but not cause "he wanted out" but to be able to move freely between family members houses. He was tired of having to quarantine every time he went to or from the states.
        Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
        6 août 2023 à 20 h 46
        #63
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2021
        Messages: 4,983
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,296
        Big W's for MTL & PIT, Huge L for SJS imo. I wouldn't even be trying to trade Petry personally, not this year anyway. One of the goalies should be on the way out though.
         
        Répondre
        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
        Question:
        Options:
        Ajouter une option
        Soumettre le sondage