SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Convinced they could add a top player and ppl will still say not a playoff team

Créé par: csick
Équipe: 2023-24 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 2 août 2023
Publié: 2 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
If they mostly stay healthy and get average goaltending , they’re a playoff team. Same exact thing with Buffalo. They don’t need to worry about the other teams. Get 95+ pts and they’re in
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
22 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 150 000 $
Transactions
OTT
SJS
  1. Joseph, Mathieu
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2026
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $80 929 880 $0 $1 850 000 $2 570 120 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 350 000 $8 350 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $
DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 août 2023 à 22 h 39
#51
Démarrer sujet
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 43,945
Mentions "j'aime": 24,634
Quoting: Leafsfan98
If 3 out of the 4 lines couldn't score... and they lost more goals with ADB departure, how do you think they make the playoffs?

To add, Pelech was a + this year on a team where 3 out of the 4 lines couldn't score... Same with Spurgeon and Ekholm was an even on a team where 4 out of the 4 teams couldn't score, what's Sanderson's next excuse on why he's, currently, great on the defensive side of the puck


Norris and Chychrun will be here for more than 20 games combined, both are goal scorers. Kubalik and Tarasenko will more than replace 27 goals of Cat and 5 goals or less of any other forward we lost that isn’t good
4 août 2023 à 20 h 7
#52
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
Quoting: mokumboi
Uhh no. Nobody said anything like that. In fact, I bet no one in history has ever said that +/- is enough to rate a player by itself.

How does it shifted to "rate a player by itself"?

I see people using =/- as a way to analyze if a player is good defensively pretty regularly, like that Leafs fan did in this very thread.

Quoting: Leafsfan98
To add, Pelech was a + this year on a team where 3 out of the 4 lines couldn't score... Same with Spurgeon and Ekholm was an even on a team where 4 out of the 4 teams couldn't score, what's Sanderson's next excuse on why he's, currently, great on the defensive side of the puck

Don't want to continue the silly +/- argument but Sanderson was 20 y/o... It shouldn't have been expected of him to be as good as some of the best D-men defensively in the league... I am not sure why these things need to be pointed out
4 août 2023 à 20 h 20
#53
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,662
Mentions "j'aime": 11,479
Quoting: Xspyrit
How does it shifted to "rate a player by itself"?

I see people using =/- as a way to analyze if a player is good defensively pretty regularly, like that Leafs fan did in this very thread.


1 - There was no shift. I was paraphrasing this: "+/- is GF%, which could be useful but looking at +/- without any context is not going to say anything". Without any context tends to equate to being the sole form of analysis. If that's not quite what you meant, fine. But that's kinda what it sounds like.

2 - And we all see people using xG share like that 100 times as much. So what?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage