SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Center and Franchise

Créé par: PeterK
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 26 juill. 2023
Publié: 26 juill. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Moving Dustin Wolff to the minors for a set period would allow this cap hit.
I feel like this is a good trade for both parties. San Jose can flip those assets or resign them at the deadline for even more value. Dube and Hanafin are not going to depreciate. The first is for Markstrom who can still put out an all star year every now and again. Lets face it - Sharks are screwed until Vlasic's contract is over.
Transactions
1.
2.
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $78 751 532 $0 $865 000 $4 748 468 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
813 333 $813 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
G
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 juill. 2023 à 15 h 9
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 712
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Your amazing, this rocks. smile
26 juill. 2023 à 15 h 9
#2
"Go sell ice cream!"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,008
Mentions "j'aime": 1,352
San Jose is tanking so I would think they prefer futures and not roster players that will improve the team and worsen the draft lottery chances. Flipping players is too risky in season as an injury completely negates their value.
26 juill. 2023 à 15 h 9
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 712
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: PeterK
Your amazing, this rocks. smile


Thanks man. you rock too.
26 juill. 2023 à 15 h 10
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 712
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: jfkst1
San Jose is tanking so I would think they prefer futures and not roster players that will improve the team and worsen the draft lottery chances. Flipping players is too risky in season as an injury completely negates their value.


I think 3 quality assets should offset that. Also, they don't have to wait until deadline.
26 juill. 2023 à 15 h 10
#5
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,654
Mentions "j'aime": 3,102
Leafs decline
26 juill. 2023 à 15 h 18
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 712
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: RipNasty
Leafs decline


. . . go on . . .
26 juill. 2023 à 15 h 21
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Leafs aren’t so tight on getting under the cap anymore, suppose it depends on the extension prices. If Lindholm came with like 8x8 extension and Nylander still won’t budge off of 9.5-10M or more then perhaps yes
26 juill. 2023 à 15 h 31
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 198
Mentions "j'aime": 39
Flames have to add
26 juill. 2023 à 15 h 56
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 712
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: leafs101
Leafs aren’t so tight on getting under the cap anymore, suppose it depends on the extension prices. If Lindholm came with like 8x8 extension and Nylander still won’t budge off of 9.5-10M or more then perhaps yes


not even sure which side you are arguing.
26 juill. 2023 à 16 h 41
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 78
Mentions "j'aime": 44
This is a pretty darn good team on paper, but I see three issues that might hinder it's competitiveness:

1. No cap space for extra hands. You need to carry at least 22 players all the time during the season for minor injuries and cold streaks, there's no way to get an extra player up without putting someone on LTIR. Ideally the Flames would shed another $1.5M-$2M.

2. Even with a $4M increase to the salary cap in 2024/25, you'd still lose a quality player or two with all the expiring contracts. Losing Backlund to free agency might not be a huge hit with some of the young forwards the Flames have coming up, but the entire bottom 4 defense group is expiring as well. Nylander, Zadorov, Pelletier, and Ruzicka will certainly be getting raises. Kylington might if he returns to form, as could Kahkonen and Wolf with good seasons.

3. Defence and goaltending is pretty suspect. Kylington is a real wild card, he has one standout season under his belt and no guarantee to return to that level after a year away. Tanev's body is falling apart, and I don't think Oesterle should be an every game guy. After that your next best Dman is Gilbert, who also doesn't inspire a lot of confidence. It's tough to say what you'd get from Kahkonen, Vladar, and Wolf. If all three prove they're not ready to be NHL starters, you're hooped.

All in all a pretty fun team, and certainly different than most posts around.
26 juill. 2023 à 16 h 54
#11
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,654
Mentions "j'aime": 3,102
Quoting: PeterK
. . . go on . . .


Nylander is younger and better
27 juill. 2023 à 9 h 47
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: PeterK
not even sure which side you are arguing.


I’m saying my answer to this deal would depend on what the price is to extend each player. I think Nylander is better, but if his next contract is 9.75M and Lindholms is like 8M then i’d probably take the deal
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage