These are calculations. Math. Objective.
https://skillstx.com/objective-vs-subjective/#:~:text=Based%20on%20or%20influenced%20by%20personal%20feelings%2C%20tastes%2C%20or%20opinions.&text=Objective%3A,in%20considering%20and%20representing%20facts.

Your eye test is subjective. Variable from person to person.

There is no such thing as a subjective formula. If a formula is compelling and complete, making it repeatable by third parties distinct from the creator, it is by its very nature objective. You can't take the equation for the ideal gas law and get different answers depending on how you feel. Now, you can dispute if the equations are good or not but you can't argue they are subjective, they aren't.

Here is my source:
https://moneypuck.com/player.htm?p=8477402
https://moneypuck.com/player.htm?p=8477404

I believe you have your years mixed up for Guentzel. He had 1.9 this year and 2.5 last year. Which is what I said, so we agree.

I also said if Bush wasn't insanely lucky (20% shooting, good for 5th in the NHL, and 7% better than his career average), he would be right around Guentzel both years.

As I said to Sicarius, Bush is a very good player but he wouldn't be LW #1 on the Pens and as a lefty, he wouldn't be put on the RW. Thus he would be 2nd LW, a position the Pens don't need. They need a 3rd C.

Holy ****, dude. We're done here. I'm not licensed for this sort of patient care.

That's funny. A doctor needing patient care because he can't explain basic science to someone. I can see that being a good short film.

Have a good day. 😀