SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lower key moves

Créé par: SlimTJ100
Équipe: 2023-24 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 25 juin 2023
Publié: 25 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Goodrow would probably waive to go back to SJ. I like this deal for both teams, Garand is by all accounts a pretty good NHL prospect in net. Goodrow gives them some veteran leadership during a tough couple years coming up

Rangers get some top 9 RW depth (most pressing need imo) and a capable BUG holding Shestys clip board

Two keys to next season will be Laf moving to RW and Cuylle REALLY needs to make the team next year, or Othman. Either ELC is a must in the the lineup

These UFA signings are who I feel is the best fit for the NYR.

-Motte needs stay this time, he fits exactly what they need (I gave him an additional year to keep the AAV down)

-I could see Accari or Nosek coming to Ny, take your pick on who

-and I could also see one more player IE-Bluger, Bellmare or Brassard, for example, being added for additional center depth.

-If Wheeler gets bought out I could see him signed also.

Imo, NYR will sign a couple of lower tier UFAs like this, 1 or 2, possibly 3 guys making under two million bucks
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 350 000 $
23 800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
31 100 000 $
21 100 000 $
21 500 000 $
Transactions
NYR
  1. Barabanov, Alexander
  2. Kähkönen, Kaapo (1 375 000 $ retained)
SJS
  1. Garand, Dylan
  2. Goodrow, Barclay
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (COL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de EDM
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de MIN
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $83 461 249 $610 892 $482 500 $38 751 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 437 500 $4 437 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
812 500 $812 500 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
787 500 $787 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 juin 2023 à 22 h 37
#1
SJS Tanking fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 579
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Lmao that deal is awful for the Sharks.

Barabanov >>>>>>> Goodrow and on a better contract
glarson17 et ChevelsDayOff a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2023 à 22 h 38
#2
Démarrer sujet
Milolaborino
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 317
Quoting: Whiskerz
Lmao that deal is awful for the Sharks.

Barabanov >>>>>>> Goodrow and on a better contract


Nice to know you can read 🙄
25 juin 2023 à 22 h 42
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,181
Mentions "j'aime": 3,661
Add at least a 1st going to San Jose and that starts the conversation.
Brian_O_Blivion a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2023 à 22 h 49
#4
Démarrer sujet
Milolaborino
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 317
Quoting: glarson17
Add at least a 1st going to San Jose and that starts the conversation.


I like how guys completely dismiss Garands ability. If you have goalies in the pipeline then ok. But please this trade is not nearly the insult you think it is (go look at his AHL playoff stats)
25 juin 2023 à 22 h 55
#5
Moo-kama-doo-lin
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 937
Mentions "j'aime": 347
Quoting: SlimTJ100
I like how guys completely dismiss Garands ability. If you have goalies in the pipeline then ok. But please this trade is not nearly the insult you think it is (go look at his AHL playoff stats)


Garand isn’t the problem. Four seasons of Goodrow and losing Barabanov for a cap dump is. That ruins the deal. Sharks have two retention spots left, 1 for Karlsson and not wasting one on a 2 mil player for a cap dump. This trade is horrible for the sharks just admit it.
25 juin 2023 à 22 h 59
#6
They bought it
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 331
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Quoting: SlimTJ100
I like how guys completely dismiss Garands ability. If you have goalies in the pipeline then ok. But please this trade is not nearly the insult you think it is (go look at his AHL playoff stats)


Quoting: Brian_O_Blivion
Garand isn’t the problem. Four seasons of Goodrow and losing Barabanov for a cap dump is. That ruins the deal. Sharks have two retention spots left, 1 for Karlsson and not wasting one on a 2 mil player for a cap dump. This trade is horrible for the sharks just admit it.


also, didnt garand get absolutely lit up in the AHL last year lol
25 juin 2023 à 22 h 59
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,181
Mentions "j'aime": 3,661
Quoting: SlimTJ100
I like how guys completely dismiss Garands ability. If you have goalies in the pipeline then ok. But please this trade is not nearly the insult you think it is (go look at his AHL playoff stats)


Barabanov is a 50 point player, Kahkonen half retained and San Jose taking on 4 years of a 30 point nearly $4 mil player. Garand is like a C prospect, not that great
25 juin 2023 à 23 h 0
#8
Démarrer sujet
Milolaborino
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 317
Modifié 25 juin 2023 à 23 h 10
Quoting: Brian_O_Blivion
Garand isn’t the problem. Four seasons of Goodrow and losing Barabanov for a cap dump is. That ruins the deal. Sharks have two retention spots left, 1 for Karlsson and not wasting one on a 2 mil player for a cap dump. This trade is horrible for the sharks just admit it.

Never mind a future #1 goalie you’ll have. Nah let’s keep a middle of the road winger who’s 29 for a couple years instead. Who was a -30 last year oofah
25 juin 2023 à 23 h 2
#9
Démarrer sujet
Milolaborino
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 317
Quoting: ChevelsDayOff
also, didnt garand get absolutely lit up in the AHL last year lol


Quoting: ChevelsDayOff
also, didnt garand get absolutely lit up in the AHL last year lol


Quoting: ChevelsDayOff
also, didnt garand get absolutely lit up in the AHL last year lol


Quoting: glarson17
Barabanov is a 50 point player, Kahkonen half retained and San Jose taking on 4 years of a 30 point nearly $4 mil player. Garand is like a C prospect, not that great


He isn’t lol

Playoff stats 5-3 1.76 GAA .935 save%. That’s C level?? He’s 21 years old ffs
25 juin 2023 à 23 h 4
#10
Démarrer sujet
Milolaborino
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 317
You can keep Kakonen btw lol we can find a million back ups
25 juin 2023 à 23 h 14
#11
aecliptic
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,947
Mentions "j'aime": 1,284
Id focus on a team that might actually want Goodrow and has cap space. Thats the Kraken. He would reunite with his buddy Gourde and Goodrow plays the type of hockey that would fit in seamlessly there..
25 juin 2023 à 23 h 20
#12
sharks88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: SlimTJ100
He isn’t lol

Playoff stats 5-3 1.76 GAA .935 save%. That’s C level?? He’s 21 years old ffs


Regular season stats 32GP 3.01 .894 save%. Solid playoff, but lets stop pretending like he's a lock to be a #1 goalie.
ChevelsDayOff a aimé ceci.
25 juin 2023 à 23 h 20
#13
They bought it
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 331
Mentions "j'aime": 173
Quoting: SlimTJ100
He isn’t lol

Playoff stats 5-3 1.76 GAA .935 save%. That’s C level?? He’s 21 years old ffs


just gonna ignore the fact that as a fourth round pick he put up sub .900 numbers playing half the regular season? sure he had a good playoffs but to project him as a #1 is coping hard, just accept this trade is bad for the sharks
25 juin 2023 à 23 h 24
#14
Démarrer sujet
Milolaborino
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 317
Quoting: sharksdoee
Regular season stats 32GP 3.01 .894 save%. Solid playoff, but let’s stop pretending like he's a lock to be a #1 goalie.

He’s 21.

Fine keep Bara. You guys are clueless
25 juin 2023 à 23 h 36
#15
sharks88
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 351
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: SlimTJ100
He’s 21.

Fine keep Bara. You guys are clueless


Coming from the guy saying a 21 y/o 4th rounder is going to be a future #1 because you can cherrypick 2 weeks of stats.
26 juin 2023 à 7 h 32
#16
Démarrer sujet
Milolaborino
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,128
Mentions "j'aime": 317
Modifié 26 juin 2023 à 7 h 38
Quoting: sharksdoee
Coming from the guy saying a 21 y/o 4th rounder is going to be a future #1 because you can cherrypick 2 weeks of stats.


You’re missing why they would do this trade. What is the point of Bara being a Shark? You guys suck (no disrespect), By the time they’ll be good again he’ll be old. He’s 29. At least you have a PROSPECT for him, a 21 yr old goalie who just put all world stats in the PLAYOFFS of his league. And what does it matter he was a 4th rd pick? You know who was a 7th rd pick? henrik Lundqvist

Never in a million years did I think I’d be fighting so hard about this trade 😂

He was a minus 30!!!

What do you want for Bara? At this point I’ll move on tho I have a feeling 🤔
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage