SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2023-2024 CHI

Créé par: Stevy_Deagle
Équipe: 2023-24 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 18 juin 2023
Publié: 18 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
35 500 000 $
44 750 000 $
35 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Bedard, Connor
3950 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $67 159 291 $0 $1 780 000 $16 340 709 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 1
Bedard, Connor
950 000 $950 000 $
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance505 000 $$505K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
962 500 $962 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 juin 2023 à 22 h 28
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,256
Mentions "j'aime": 2,201
I can't see us signing anyone longer than 2 years in this FA class
19 juin 2023 à 4 h 27
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: SlickWilly
I can't see us signing anyone longer than 2 years in this FA class


Whilst I agree, would make for good viewing, pairing Barbashev with Bedard!
Garak, Hawksguy81 et SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
19 juin 2023 à 7 h 21
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,092
Mentions "j'aime": 10,962
Quoting: SlickWilly
I can't see us signing anyone longer than 2 years in this FA class


Only thing is, I'm not sure there are any guys worth adding that would sign for less than 3 or 4 years. Otherwise, I do agree that it would be ideal for CHI's rebuild to not sign anyone over 2 years, though.
Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
19 juin 2023 à 9 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,256
Mentions "j'aime": 2,201
Quoting: Garak
Only thing is, I'm not sure there are any guys worth adding that would sign for less than 3 or 4 years. Otherwise, I do agree that it would be ideal for CHI's rebuild to not sign anyone over 2 years, though.


I dont think there's anyone in this class in general that's worth signing for more than 4 years other than Bertuzzi
19 juin 2023 à 9 h 16
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,092
Mentions "j'aime": 10,962
Quoting: SlickWilly
I dont think there's anyone in this class in general that's worth signing for more than 4 years other than Bertuzzi


I get the allure, because he is an intriguing hockey player, but that'd be a big hell no from me. haha. Would not want Bertuzzi at all. We don't need anti-vax rhetoric in the locker room with a young and developing team. I'm already uneasy enough having Jones pro-Trump dog crap in there. Although, Jones comments were made during Trumps initial Campaign and I don't think he is too vocal about that stuff anymore. When you are trying to build a socially conscious culture and mold young men into professionals, in the wake of the Sexual Assault investigation coming to light, that sort of backwards stuff can throw everything off and "poison the well", so to speak. Something like that could set CHI back another decade or longer.
19 juin 2023 à 9 h 23
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,256
Mentions "j'aime": 2,201
Quoting: Garak
I get the allure, because he is an intriguing hockey player, but that'd be a big hell no from me. haha. Would not want Bertuzzi at all. We don't need anti-vax rhetoric in the locker room with a young and developing team. I'm already uneasy enough having Jones pro-Trump dog crap in there. Although, Jones comments were made during Trumps initial Campaign and I don't think he is too vocal about that stuff anymore. When you are trying to build a socially conscious culture and mold young men into professionals, in the wake of the Sexual Assault investigation coming to light, that sort of backwards stuff can throw everything off and "poison the well", so to speak. Something like that could set CHI back another decade or longer.


Im not saying I want him, I'm just saying he's the only player on the market who has the upside to warrant it and isnt injury riddled/over 30
Garak a aimé ceci.
19 juin 2023 à 9 h 29
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,092
Mentions "j'aime": 10,962
Quoting: SlickWilly
Im not saying I want him, I'm just saying he's the only player on the market who has the upside to warrant it and isnt injury riddled/over 30


Oh, ok. Gotcha. Yeah. There definitely isn't a whole lot available. It's a pretty thin UFA class. I might consider Barbashev, Bunting, Compher, or Domi with some term, though. Maybe even Killorn, he seems like he could still play at a high level for at least another 4 years.

Edit: And most of those players shouldn't really expect much more than what Zacha got from BOS.
19 juin 2023 à 9 h 35
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,256
Mentions "j'aime": 2,201
Quoting: Garak
Oh, ok. Gotcha. Yeah. There definitely isn't a whole lot available. It's a pretty thin UFA class. I might consider Barbashev, Bunting, Compher, or Domi with some term, though. Maybe even Killorn, he seems like he could still play at a high level for at least another 4 years.

Edit: And most of those players shouldn't really expect much more than what Zacha got from BOS.


You can find those type of players in every FA class though. There's no reason to overpay for one just for the sake of locking them up, because chances are their contracts are going to age horribly. For a team in contention, that's fine because you need to capitalize on your window. For us? If their contract ages horribly, thats right in the middle of when we should be contending. We can't afford that. If you want one of those guys, lets wait until next year and just sign someone like Stephenson, Martinook, or Foegele. Its the exact same player model. No need to be signing those guys too early for too long
Garak a aimé ceci.
19 juin 2023 à 9 h 54
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 11,092
Mentions "j'aime": 10,962
Quoting: SlickWilly
You can find those type of players in every FA class though. There's no reason to overpay for one just for the sake of locking them up, because chances are their contracts are going to age horribly. For a team in contention, that's fine because you need to capitalize on your window. For us? If their contract ages horribly, thats right in the middle of when we should be contending. We can't afford that. If you want one of those guys, lets wait until next year and just sign someone like Stephenson, Martinook, or Foegele. Its the exact same player model. No need to be signing those guys too early for too long


Martinook or Foegele? Domi, Barb, Bunt, Compher, and Killorn are much more desirable players than them. Regardless, what separates Bertuzzi from that same logic? IMO, nothing. He is in the same age group, with relatively the same production rate, with just as much of a chance of his next contract not aging well.

I'm not saying we should sign any of them, either. I was just saying, if we were looking into the UFA market, I would look at them before Bertuzzi any day of the week.
SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage