Minnesota isn't giving you their cheap 1c and taking on your cap dump. No from Minnesota

Add Drai 50% retained and then you can have Wilson

Even if we assume you have compromising pictures of Bill Guerin to get him to say yes to that offer, he'd still need to find a way to make the extra cap hit work which isn't possible without moving some extra players or running a 20 man roster. Go do a Minnesota ACGM without making a bunch of unrealistic trades or signings to see how bad their cap situation is this summer, I'll wait here while you do that.

I honestly think this deal for Raddysh is fair. That said, I think the Hawks are hoping he can build off his 20 goal season, and flip him for a 1st at the deadline. So I don’t think we would go for this.

That is a ****ing horrible trade for Washington. Tom Wilson (with 50% retention) for Kulak who has no value, Petrov who surprisingly has less value than Kulak, and a late 2nd. How could Washington possibly say no to that massive steaming pile of crap?

Hawks decline. They won't trade Raddysh for a 2nd at this point. The rest of that package wouldn't interest the Hawks at all.

I agree that Minnesota easily declines this trade but calling Hartman a 1C is insanity.

He's Minnesota 1c

kulak and petrov definitely have value but certainly not enough for Wilson at 50%

Minnesota hasn't had a 1C in a long time. Just cus he plays on the top line doesn't mean he should be.

Once again doesn't mean he should , but he's still Minnesota 1c. Don't get why a Chicago fan cares so much

Your first comment made it seem like Hartman should be valued as a 1C. Was just curios.

Now go back to the drawing board and come up with a new proposal for Wilson. And then throw that out too because it'll probably be just as bad