SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Go for the cup

Créé par: Henkileeto
Équipe: 2023-24 Kraken de Seattle
Date de création initiale: 17 mai 2023
Publié: 17 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The kraken really came together this season and their depth was a huge part of their strength. But in order to win they have to bank on Beniers going godmode, Grubauer being better and others to keep delivering on a high level.

I think that Toronto might have to consider dealing Matthews/Nylander and among them i consider matt more for a couple of reasons, the most important one is the return a team like Seattle can offer in return for a top 5 centre in the league with an extension in place. Which i see as a 13x8 mil isch. The package should be centrered around Wright, high draftpick, potential nr1 centre and some other high quality pieces.

In order to improve goaltending, Driedger has to go in a dump and another brought in. Preferably someone who can play games and force Grubauer on the bench or up his game, 1a 1b.

Columbus need to make space for other guys and trading Boqvist gets them back some to help other areas and Seattle can use him like schultz.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
42 500 000 $
87 000 000 $
32 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
SEA
  1. Matthews, Auston
Détails additionnels:
Signs 8 years
TOR
  1. Schultz, Justin
  2. Tanev, Brandon
  3. Wennberg, Alexander
  4. Wright, Shane
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
Détails additionnels:
Ok, so it's a lot. but consider the Eichel deal. elite centre (injured) netted a first rounder and krebs(former 1st) and tuch as well as 2nd rounder.

Translate to this and you get a worse 1st rounder, say Wennberg is a worse tuch and Wright is a much better Krebs. tanev+schultz is more than a second and you end up compensating for no injury.

Toronto spreads the cap around, get a placeholder 2c and next years 2c, get tougher and some help on RD. and they get back som draftcapital for either a DL move or to keep. things could be worse
2.
SEA
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
SJS
  1. Driedger, Chris
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (WPG)
3.
SEA
  1. Boqvist, Adam
Détails additionnels:
they need to make space for Jiricek, flip pick for help somewhere
CBJ
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de SEA
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de WSH
Logo de SEA
2024
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $83 046 826 $129 910 $1 850 000 $453 174 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
897 500 $897 500 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 mai 2023 à 8 h 9
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,556
Mentions "j'aime": 3,045
The only of value going to Toronto is Wright (who isn’t looking that great) and a late first. Why would Toronto do this?
aadoyle a aimé ceci.
17 mai 2023 à 8 h 16
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 16,034
Mentions "j'aime": 12,345
Teams don’t play with 20 man rosters
palhal a aimé ceci.
17 mai 2023 à 8 h 21
#3
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 10,232
Mentions "j'aime": 3,120
I get what your value is but consider this: Matthews>>>>>>Eichel
17 mai 2023 à 9 h 22
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 252
Mentions "j'aime": 183
Columbus doesn’t need to open a space for Jiricek, he can either play top pair with Z or be the second pair guy behind Boqvist.
17 mai 2023 à 9 h 41
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 60,334
Mentions "j'aime": 23,158
The hiccup in the deal is that Matthews will resign with Seattle. Actually as Leaf fan, I think the deal is good if Matthews isn't going to be resign with the Leafs.
I'm a the believer the Leafs should be in "sell" mode this season, and that means trading Matthews/Nylander and Brodie at some time.
17 mai 2023 à 18 h 9
#6
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 34,732
Mentions "j'aime": 21,187
Quoting: ecupirate07
The only of value going to Toronto is Wright (who isn’t looking that great) and a late first. Why would Toronto do this?


In general I have seen a lot of SEA trades ranging from Matthews to Marner and neither make sense for either side

I dont see Marner getting the return people expect and for Matthews man some of the proposals undervalue the hell out of him lul

This case 100% its just meh, meh meh, Wright, and a potential low 1st not a great return for a top 5 C
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage