SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Trade Machine Proposals

Lindy gone

Créé par: deez
Publié: 1 mai 2023 à 11 h 29
Plafond salarial: 82 500 000 $
Journées à la saison: 185/185 (100%)
Détermination du registraire central: Cette transaction a été refusée, car une des équipes n'a pas atteint le plancher salarial

Logo de Ducks d'AnaheimDucks d'Anaheim

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Comtois, MaximeDucks d'AnaheimLNH-0 $011---0000--
Zellweger, OlenExempté du ballottageDucks d'AnaheimJunior-0 $001---0000--
Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Ducks d'AnaheimANA)---100------
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Tanev, ChristopherFlames de CalgaryLNH-4 500 000 $011---0000--
Lindholm, EliasFlames de CalgaryLNH-4 850 000 $011---0000--
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial38 048 333 $1531663913
Variation-9 350 000 $120-100
Final28 698 333 $ (↓)16 (↑)33 (↑)662 (↓)913000

Logo de Flames de CalgaryFlames de Calgary

DépartStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Tanev, ChristopherFlames de CalgaryLNH-4 500 000 $011---0000--
Lindholm, EliasFlames de CalgaryLNH-4 850 000 $011---0000--
ArrivéeStatutSalaire retenuCap hit effectifFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Comtois, MaximeDucks d'AnaheimLNH-0 $011---0000--
Zellweger, OlenExempté du ballottageDucks d'AnaheimJunior-0 $001---0000--
Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (Logo de Ducks d'AnaheimANA)---100------
VariationEspace sous le plafond salarialFormationSPCListe de réserveChoix 1e rd2e et 3e rd4e à 7e rdPJGAPMBA%EFF
Initial250 000 $183469369
Variation9 350 000 $-1-20100
Final9 600 000 $ (↑)17 (↓)32 (↓)694 (↑)69000
1 mai 2023 à 11 h 56
#1
Dutchies
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 6,611
Mentions "j'aime": 4,755
I can't see ANA giving up Zellweger in this deal.
1 mai 2023 à 12 h 18
#2
GeneralLandro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,533
Mentions "j'aime": 11,915
Quoting: Dutchies
I can't see ANA giving up Zellweger in this deal.


or our 24 1st
1 mai 2023 à 12 h 19
#3
GeneralLandro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,533
Mentions "j'aime": 11,915
how about Minnesota's 23 3rd for Zadorov
1 mai 2023 à 12 h 30
#4
MoxNix
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,451
Mentions "j'aime": 3,190
Modifié 1 mai 2023 à 12 h 36
Anaheim wouldn't have much interested in Tanev. He's still pretty good but he's too old for Anaheim's timeline. Lindholm won't be traded unless he won't extend in Calgary if that happens Comtois and the 1st just might be enough to get him but they'll probably get better offers.
1 mai 2023 à 12 h 31
#5
deez
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 100
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Dutchies
I can't see ANA giving up Zellweger in this deal.


Bo Horvat trade yielded 1st rd pick, top prospect, and a productive middle six player. Lindholm holds similar value to Horvat, maybe more due to his two-way game. Zellweger is a better prospect than Raty sure but including Tanev in the deal gives Anaheim a legit shut down guy to groom their young d-core. Leafs got Luke Schenn for a 3rd and McCabe/Lafferty for a 1st... Tanev is better than both. If Anaheim wants to compete, they could do alot worse.

If anyone wants Lindholm, a 1st and top prospect is where the conversation would begin.
MoxNix a aimé ceci.
1 mai 2023 à 12 h 31
#6
MoxNix
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 7,451
Mentions "j'aime": 3,190
Quoting: GeneralLandro
how about Minnesota's 23 3rd for Zadorov


No thanks. You might get Markstrom for that except he wouldn't waive for Anaheim.
1 mai 2023 à 12 h 36
#7
GeneralLandro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,533
Mentions "j'aime": 11,915
Quoting: MoxNix
No thanks. You might get Markstrom for that except he wouldn't waive for Anaheim.


why would we want him?
2 mai 2023 à 1 h 16
#8
slomo
slomo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 748
Mentions "j'aime": 89
Awesome trade.
2 mai 2023 à 20 h 55
#9
Jah1722
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,898
Quoting: deez
Bo Horvat trade yielded 1st rd pick, top prospect, and a productive middle six player. Lindholm holds similar value to Horvat, maybe more due to his two-way game. Zellweger is a better prospect than Raty sure but including Tanev in the deal gives Anaheim a legit shut down guy to groom their young d-core. Leafs got Luke Schenn for a 3rd and McCabe/Lafferty for a 1st... Tanev is better than both. If Anaheim wants to compete, they could do alot worse.

If anyone wants Lindholm, a 1st and top prospect is where the conversation would begin.


You just compared the Horvat trade made by playoff contender NYI to this. They’re not even close to similar. Why would ANA trade high value futures for 2 UFAs? Make it make sense
4 mai 2023 à 11 h 45
#10
deez
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 100
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Jah1722
You just compared the Horvat trade made by playoff contender NYI to this. They’re not even close to similar. Why would ANA trade high value futures for 2 UFAs? Make it make sense


It's a comparison of value. "If Anaheim wants to compete, they could do alot worse." Doesn't sound like you have much confidence in the Ducks retaining valuable players...
4 mai 2023 à 12 h 58
#11
Jah1722
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,898
Quoting: deez
It's a comparison of value. "If Anaheim wants to compete, they could do alot worse." Doesn't sound like you have much confidence in the Ducks retaining valuable players...


No I just understand that this trade makes zero sense for the ducks.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage