SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

EK65 puts these guys over the edge

Créé par: GM_Todd
Équipe: 2023-24 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 9 avr. 2023
Publié: 9 avr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
2950 000 $
2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
1775 000 $
1895 833 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Karlsson, Erik (1 600 000 $ retained)
SJS
  1. Bourgault, Xavier
  2. Broberg, Philip
  3. Campbell, Jack
  4. Ceci, Cody
  5. Foegele, Warren
  6. Savoie, Carter
  7. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
  8. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de NSH
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $80 250 000 $850 000 $650 000 $2 250 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance650 000 $$650K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
895 833 $895 833 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 400 000 $8 400 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
775 000 $775 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 avr. 2023 à 16 h 0
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 894
Mentions "j'aime": 337
Sharks 100% do that
9 avr. 2023 à 16 h 0
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,714
Mentions "j'aime": 4,912
I’m a sharks fan and that’s too much for Karlsson.
Karlsson 3 mil retained
Benning
For
Bouchard
Ceci
Campbell
Foegele
23 2nd
24 1st

That fits more what the sharks need and would be more affordable for Oilers.
9 avr. 2023 à 16 h 2
#3
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 10,519
Mentions "j'aime": 3,191
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I’m a sharks fan and that’s too much for Karlsson.
Karlsson 3 mil retained
Benning
For
Bouchard
Ceci
Campbell
Foegele
23 2nd
24 1st

That fits more what the sharks need and would be more affordable for Oilers.


At this point in time, you're saying

Karlson
Benning
For
Bouchard

which isn't that fair when you think about how well Karlsson's done
9 avr. 2023 à 16 h 13
#4
Joe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 7,823
Mentions "j'aime": 5,685
Kane, Karlsson to Edmonton 🤞

I want to see a team win the Stanley cup despite averaging the most shots against a game.
9 avr. 2023 à 17 h 15
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,714
Mentions "j'aime": 4,912
Quoting: Leafsfan98
At this point in time, you're saying

Karlson
Benning
For
Bouchard

which isn't that fair when you think about how well Karlsson's done


Yes when you take his Ottawa years plus this year that’s a massive underpay, but getting a young flourishing 2 way top 4 d for a 32/33 year old RD who plays no D and has a massive injury history and it’s not that far off
9 avr. 2023 à 17 h 32
#6
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 10,519
Mentions "j'aime": 3,191
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Yes when you take his Ottawa years plus this year that’s a massive underpay, but getting a young flourishing 2 way top 4 d for a 32/33 year old RD who plays no D and has a massive injury history and it’s not that far off


Karlson was good in Ottawa though, he struggled because he wasn't the number 1 defensemen when he moved to SJ, now that Burns is traded, he's back to where he was when SJ acquired him
9 avr. 2023 à 21 h 16
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,714
Mentions "j'aime": 4,912
Quoting: Leafsfan98
Karlson was good in Ottawa though, he struggled because he wasn't the number 1 defensemen when he moved to SJ, now that Burns is traded, he's back to where he was when SJ acquired him


Still plays zero D and the injuries hurt him. But yea having 2 Elite #1 RD wasn’t as ideal as we had hoped.
Both Burns and Karlsson have had fantastic years separated.
10 avr. 2023 à 13 h 29
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,327
Mentions "j'aime": 7,846
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
I’m a sharks fan and that’s too much for Karlsson.
Karlsson 3 mil retained
Benning
For
Bouchard
Ceci
Campbell
Foegele
23 2nd
24 1st

That fits more what the sharks need and would be more affordable for Oilers.


It's too much, but so is you proposal. The Oilers aren't moving Bouchard. Benning is a 3rd pairing guy (Desharnais has that covered) so your proposal leaves a gaping hole at 2RD. Ceci and Foegele are outplaying their contracts and Karlsson won't continue his current pace. He also doesn't bring a lot of defense to the table. I just don't see why Edmonton should trade defense for more offence.
10 avr. 2023 à 13 h 32
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,327
Mentions "j'aime": 7,846
Quoting: Leafsfan98
At this point in time, you're saying

Karlson
Benning
For
Bouchard

which isn't that fair when you think about how well Karlsson's done

Why are you ignoring Ceci, Campbell and Foegele? Ceci is a defensive defenseman who is playing 1st pairing in Edmonton. Campbell appears to be turning his game around (too soon to know for sure) and Foegele is killing it in his role.
10 avr. 2023 à 14 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,714
Mentions "j'aime": 4,912
Quoting: CD282
It's too much, but so is you proposal. The Oilers aren't moving Bouchard. Benning is a 3rd pairing guy (Desharnais has that covered) so your proposal leaves a gaping hole at 2RD. Ceci and Foegele are outplaying their contracts and Karlsson won't continue his current pace. He also doesn't bring a lot of defense to the table. I just don't see why Edmonton should trade defense for more offence.


From an on outside perspective Campbell was a bad signing, he was trending down in Toronto and has gotten worse in Edmonton plus Skinner is clearly the future, Foegele and Ceci are average players at best and with a weaker supporting cast their value would diminish exponentially.
I added those 3 for cap purposes only and would rather not take any of them on.
If it was just Karlsson 3 mil retained I would ask
Bouchard Plus a 2nd but then you guys have a bad cap crunch.
And if you take out Bouchard and give up your best RD prospect it would be 2 1sts

But to your point the smart move would be not to trade for Karlsson IMO but if it means you piss off your 2 best players by not trading for him that could be dangerous as well! And word is McDavid and Draisaitl want him!
10 avr. 2023 à 14 h 47
#11
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 10,519
Mentions "j'aime": 3,191
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Still plays zero D and the injuries hurt him. But yea having 2 Elite #1 RD wasn’t as ideal as we had hoped.
Both Burns and Karlsson have had fantastic years separated.


That's what I was thinking... right mentality of sacking defensemen, wrong players to have done it with!
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
10 avr. 2023 à 14 h 55
#12
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 10,519
Mentions "j'aime": 3,191
Quoting: CD282
Why are you ignoring Ceci, Campbell and Foegele? Ceci is a defensive defenseman who is playing 1st pairing in Edmonton. Campbell appears to be turning his game around (too soon to know for sure) and Foegele is killing it in his role.


I think Ceci being called a "defensive defensemen who is playing 1st pairing in Edmonton" is part of the reason why Edmonton won't win the SC... He was so bad, he didn't make the Leafs Dcore 3 years ago when it featured guys like Ron Hainsey. Campbell isn't as good as guys like Shesterkin, Freddie, Saros, Ulmark, Husso, Oetinger and yet being payed the same as them for more term while being past his prime and Foegele isn't worth 2.25 mill, especially to the rebuilding Sharks. It would prob. take a combined 1st to take all of those contracts
10 avr. 2023 à 15 h 0
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,327
Mentions "j'aime": 7,846
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
From an on outside perspective Campbell was a bad signing, he was trending down in Toronto and has gotten worse in Edmonton plus Skinner is clearly the future, Foegele and Ceci are average players at best and with a weaker supporting cast their value would diminish exponentially.
I added those 3 for cap purposes only and would rather not take any of them on.
If it was just Karlsson 3 mil retained I would ask
Bouchard Plus a 2nd but then you guys have a bad cap crunch.
And if you take out Bouchard and give up your best RD prospect it would be 2 1sts

But to your point the smart move would be not to trade for Karlsson IMO but if it means you piss off your 2 best players by not trading for him that could be dangerous as well! And word is McDavid and Draisaitl want him!

Holland spent his money on Ekholm instead. And nobody is complaining!

Your comment about supporting cast is off base - it's true that Ceci couldn't play 1st pairing effectively without Nurse alongside, but Foegele has been driving results in the bottom-6 himself. His sky-high IPP shows that.
10 avr. 2023 à 15 h 2
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,327
Mentions "j'aime": 7,846
Quoting: Leafsfan98
I think Ceci being called a "defensive defensemen who is playing 1st pairing in Edmonton" is part of the reason why Edmonton won't win the SC... He was so bad, he didn't make the Leafs Dcore 3 years ago when it featured guys like Ron Hainsey. Campbell isn't as good as guys like Shesterkin, Freddie, Saros, Ulmark, Husso, Oetinger and yet being payed the same as them for more term while being past his prime and Foegele isn't worth 2.25 mill, especially to the rebuilding Sharks. It would prob. take a combined 1st to take all of those contracts

Not everything revolves around the Leafs. What happened in Toronto 3 years ago is completely irrelevant. The fact is Ceci is playing 1RD on the best team in the league right now.
10 avr. 2023 à 15 h 58
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,714
Mentions "j'aime": 4,912
Quoting: CD282
Holland spent his money on Ekholm instead. And nobody is complaining!

Your comment about supporting cast is off base - it's true that Ceci couldn't play 1st pairing effectively without Nurse alongside, but Foegele has been driving results in the bottom-6 himself. His sky-high IPP shows that.


Elkholm is way better defensively and has been providing solid offense! But his career numbers are not that i a true offensive D like Karlsson. Still it was a smart trade and adds more value that Barrie who the traded away.
Plus Bouchard is looking like a stud so I have to agree Trading for Karlsson is foolish, but if the Oilers get tossed in the 1st or 2nd round because of not scoring enough they might go crazy and trade for Karlsson but if it’s because of Bad D or goaltending he would just further compound that issue!
10 avr. 2023 à 16 h 5
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,327
Mentions "j'aime": 7,846
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Elkholm is way better defensively and has been providing solid offense! But his career numbers are not that i a true offensive D like Karlsson. Still it was a smart trade and adds more value that Barrie who the traded away.
Plus Bouchard is looking like a stud so I have to agree Trading for Karlsson is foolish, but if the Oilers get tossed in the 1st or 2nd round because of not scoring enough they might go crazy and trade for Karlsson but if it’s because of Bad D or goaltending he would just further compound that issue!

Oilers are unlikely to get tossed for not scoring enough though. They're the highest scoring team in the league by a lot. In fact, this year's team is the 2nd highest scoring team this century.

And they proved last year that they didn't have any problems scoring in the playoffs. So I really don't see them trading defense for offense.
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
10 avr. 2023 à 16 h 7
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,327
Mentions "j'aime": 7,846
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
Elkholm is way better defensively and has been providing solid offense! But his career numbers are not that i a true offensive D like Karlsson. Still it was a smart trade and adds more value that Barrie who the traded away.
Plus Bouchard is looking like a stud so I have to agree Trading for Karlsson is foolish,

And Ekholm doesn't need to be a true offensive D like Karlsson - that's Bouchard's role. He was acquired for his defensive ability and any offense he provides is a bonus.
Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
10 avr. 2023 à 16 h 10
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,714
Mentions "j'aime": 4,912
Quoting: CD282
Oilers are unlikely to get tossed for not scoring enough though. They're the highest scoring team in the league by a lot. In fact, this year's team is the 2nd highest scoring team this century.

And they proved last year that they didn't have any problems scoring in the playoffs. So I really don't see them trading defense for offense.


Agreed They shouldn’t! But teams looking for that final piece do weird things. Like the sharks trading for Karlsson in the first place! Hindsight it cost them Pavelski and any chance at keeping some depth and maintaining a competitive team.
That 2020 1st (in the 18-24 range plus Norris and Pavelski along with the other pieces like Dillon Demelo Braun all shipped out for cap would have kept sharks out of this window of rebuild they are in now.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage