SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Wild 2 Year Projection - Part II

Créé par: MNCountryClub
Équipe: 2024-25 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 3 févr. 2023
Publié: 3 févr. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is a continuation of the ACGM found here: https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/674100?post_id=3836158

Obviously it's just too far to speculate accurately, but this is an attempt to wireframe what the depth chart could look like. And of course I'm having a little non-serious fun with it too - like keeping Moose around and drafting Danielson.

I think one other interesting angle is the 24-25 TDL. It's sort of assumed that the 25-26 season opens their competitive window, but technically this is the last year of the heavy buyouts. If MN is somehow able to accumulate cap that year, it may allow them to get a headstart and be somewhat active at TDL, knowing there is cap relief coming in the offseason.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
2950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
11 250 000 $
12 500 000 $
2950 000 $
12 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Danielson, Nate
3950 000 $
Transactions
MIN
SJS
  1. Greenway, Jordan
Détails additionnels:
Sharks are just a placeholder to show Greenway being dealt. Not gonna speculate on the return for this ACGM.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2024
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2025
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $72 366 087 $425 000 $1 807 500 $11 133 913 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
886 667 $886 667 $ (Bonis de performance475 000 $$475K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
RFA
Danielson, Nate
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
950 000 $950 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
G
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
863 333 $863 333 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
855 833 $855 833 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 févr. 2023 à 14 h 32
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,821
Mentions "j'aime": 3,642
It looks fun, at least.

I think it's pretty optimistic to project some of these guys into this lineup this early. Especially if Guerin and Evason are still around, I see them favoring hard nosed vets especially.

Ohgren is playing in the Swedish B league. I think it would be preferable to give him at least two years in Iowa before putting him into a top six role in the NHL.
Danielson would be a mid/late pick in his D+2 season, not many of those guys playing important roles.
Yurov is a wild card because he's the most skilled of any of our prospects, but he still doesn't have more than a fourth line role with his KHL team (still only 19 though).
Khusnutdinov I have no problems penciling into a middle six spot because he's been playing top six with his KHL team, and he will continue to be between now and then.
Beckman is tough to project too because his game has kind of stagnated.

So I think you need an all new third line if you want to go for peak realism.

I do like your point about starting the season with more cap space though, gives you options to go after a player like (examples from this season) Horvat, Meier and offer them extensions, or even a guy like Sam Bennett who comes with some term, wherever the holes are that season, you don't have to worry about future cap space AS much (with respect to some of the older prospects who will need new contracts after this).
MNCountryClub, jnowariak et Kroche6 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2023 à 15 h 11
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,693
Mentions "j'aime": 1,931
Quoting: Caerii
It looks fun, at least.

I think it's pretty optimistic to project some of these guys into this lineup this early. Especially if Guerin and Evason are still around, I see them favoring hard nosed vets especially.

Ohgren is playing in the Swedish B league. I think it would be preferable to give him at least two years in Iowa before putting him into a top six role in the NHL.
Danielson would be a mid/late pick in his D+2 season, not many of those guys playing important roles.
Yurov is a wild card because he's the most skilled of any of our prospects, but he still doesn't have more than a fourth line role with his KHL team (still only 19 though).
Khusnutdinov I have no problems penciling into a middle six spot because he's been playing top six with his KHL team, and he will continue to be between now and then.
Beckman is tough to project too because his game has kind of stagnated.

So I think you need an all new third line if you want to go for peak realism.

I do like your point about starting the season with more cap space though, gives you options to go after a player like (examples from this season) Horvat, Meier and offer them extensions, or even a guy like Sam Bennett who comes with some term, wherever the holes are that season, you don't have to worry about future cap space AS much (with respect to some of the older prospects who will need new contracts after this).


Yeah agreed, peak realism would require changes. I'm with you on the points about it being a bit too optimistic with some of those younger players - there was a parent thread where I tried to echo some of that same thinking, but couldn't figure out how to really translate that into this thread without prompting the same discussion over again. Plus it is fun to see some new names/youth.

But it does seem more likely that we'd have a stripped down version of the above with vets dropped in over the fringe-ier types. Some form of [Foligno, Hartman, Bennett, pick-a-name-out-of-a-hat] over [Ohgren, Beckman, Yurov, 23 Draft Pick].

Gonna be interesting to see what happens this TDL and offseason with RFAs/draft - in theory, that should help clarify at least some of this.
jnowariak et Kroche6 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2023 à 15 h 17
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,693
Mentions "j'aime": 1,931
@jnowariak - this is a trimmed down version of that other thread I had up. Anything besides the question marks at LD catch your eye?
jnowariak et Kroche6 a aimé ceci.
3 févr. 2023 à 15 h 27
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: drmantalban
jnowariak - this is a trimmed down version of that other thread I had up. Anything besides the question marks at LD catch your eye?


Looks exciting! I really like that 4th line. I think Foligno is exactly where he needs to be and it makes every other line better.

I’d bet you Mats signs a Pavs type deal too. He’s still cooking. I’d rearrange the lines a bit and really think they’ll want a few more vets, but I feel very good about it. I think they get a vet to compete with Beckman/Yurov for one of those mid 6 W spots.

Kap-Danielson-Zucc
Boldy-Rossi-Yurov
Marat-Ek-Beckman
Duhaime-Dewar-Foligno

Midds/Lambos-Spurg
Brods-Faber
Lambos/Merrill-Addison

Merril/Midds and a vet FWD on the bench
MNCountryClub et Kroche6 a aimé ceci.
7 févr. 2023 à 12 h 12
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,693
Mentions "j'aime": 1,931
Quoting: Caerii

I do like your point about starting the season with more cap space though, gives you options to go after a player like (examples from this season) Horvat, Meier and offer them extensions, or even a guy like Sam Bennett who comes with some term, wherever the holes are that season, you don't have to worry about future cap space AS much (with respect to some of the older prospects who will need new contracts after this).


I know this is a little out there, but in watching AZ last night, do you think Schmaltz is a potential guy to keep on the backburner for this idea? Would have control for the reminder of the 25 season, as well as that 25-26 year, which would be his 29 and 30 year old seasons. Curious what you think about him as an option - how his game will age, what AZ will look like at that time, etc?

Eichel is also another one I've wondered about, as he has that same term attached to him - i.e. 1.5 seasons of control, with the last year aligning with the cap relief, and fitting his 28 and 29 year old seasons.

I realize it's way too far to speculate accurately, but just curious if either of those names do anything for you as a purely hypothetical.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage