SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Minnesota Wild

Créé par: tahltan24
Équipe: 2022-23 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 9 janv. 2023
Publié: 9 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2024
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2025
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $81 706 921 $0 $682 500 $793 079 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
825 000 $825 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
787 500 $787 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 janv. 2023 à 13 h 9
#1
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,213
Mentions "j'aime": 1,899
Why would the Canucks do that given Boeser is an offensive players and don't need more bottom 6 wingers? Why would the wild do this with their cap situation?
9 janv. 2023 à 13 h 9
#2
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Nobody wants to take on Boeser, and that includes the wild.
9 janv. 2023 à 13 h 10
#3
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Why would the Canucks do that given Boeser is an offensive players and don't need more bottom 6 wingers? Why would the wild do this with their cap situation?


Canucks do it to shed Boeser’s anchor of a contract. Minnesota declines cause they already have two anchors who now play in Dallas and Long Island.
9 janv. 2023 à 13 h 12
#4
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,213
Mentions "j'aime": 1,899
Quoting: Isles5513
Canucks do it to shed Boeser’s anchor of a contract. Minnesota declines cause they already have two anchors who now play in Dallas and Long Island.


Boeser isn't an anchor. The anchors are OEL Myers and an imbalance of wingers (Pearson and Garland are excess) where guys like Hog and Pod could be playing on ELCs and cap better spent on center and defensive depth.
9 janv. 2023 à 13 h 14
#5
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Boeser isn't an anchor. The anchors are OEL Myers and an imbalance of wingers (Pearson and Garland are excess) where guys like Hog and Pod could be playing on ELCs and cap better spent on center and defensive depth.


Pearson and Boeser are the excess wingers lol. Garland is way better than Boeser in all aspects of the game. Boeser is washed and can’t skate. IK he’s been thru a lot and I hope he bounces back, but for now he is an anchor.
dickie_boon a aimé ceci.
9 janv. 2023 à 13 h 23
#6
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,213
Mentions "j'aime": 1,899
Quoting: Isles5513
Pearson and Boeser are the excess wingers lol. Garland is way better than Boeser in all aspects of the game. Boeser is washed and can’t skate. IK he’s been thru a lot and I hope he bounces back, but for now he is an anchor.


Boeser is challenging to move in a cap flat era if they want to move him. He's not washed. He's still a 50+pt/25 goal guy. His contract is fine. If he wants a raise, then that's an issue but I'd be fine around 6m in the future.

The issue is the new FO is so handcuffed by OEL, Myers and Pearson they have to explore moving players like Boeser to address the cap and that sucks.

They re-signed Pearson too early/shouldn't have extended, they added Garland and Kuzmenko. The gutters are clogged of wingers.
9 janv. 2023 à 13 h 48
#7
Big Shoots
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,587
Mentions "j'aime": 1,091
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Boeser isn't an anchor. The anchors are OEL Myers and an imbalance of wingers (Pearson and Garland are excess) where guys like Hog and Pod could be playing on ELCs and cap better spent on center and defensive depth.


Boeser's contract is fine given it doesn't have much term. He's been a good player, is having a bad season sure but we should be moving players for futures.
9 janv. 2023 à 13 h 55
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 134
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Wild don't want boeser! Again! Greenway isn't available
9 janv. 2023 à 16 h 5
#9
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Isles5513
Canucks do it to shed Boeser’s anchor of a contract. Minnesota declines cause they already have two anchors who now play in Dallas and Long Island.


His "anchor contract" is only 2 years long
9 janv. 2023 à 16 h 7
#10
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Juiceman
His "anchor contract" is only 2 years long


Not including the remainder of this season***
9 janv. 2023 à 16 h 8
#11
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Isles5513
Not including the remainder of this season***


This season is a wash anyway. Josh Anderson is an anchor. OEL is an anchor. Boeser is simply overpaid right now but won't cause any long term cap damage
9 janv. 2023 à 16 h 10
#12
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Juiceman
This season is a wash anyway. Josh Anderson is an anchor. OEL is an anchor. Boeser is simply overpaid right now but won't cause any long term cap damage


Well actually he can. Because he’s overpaid for the next two years. Which is why Minnesota wouldn’t want him. Maybe if you retained a significant portion of his salary that changes things but idk.
9 janv. 2023 à 16 h 12
#13
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Isles5513
Well actually he can. Because he’s overpaid for the next two years. Which is why Minnesota wouldn’t want him. Maybe if you retained a significant portion of his salary that changes things but idk.


2 years is hardly an anchor because it ends soon and is not all that hard to get out of. Canucks could just hold onto Boeser. There have been trade rumours for like 4 years now yet he is still in Vancouver
9 janv. 2023 à 16 h 27
#14
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Juiceman
2 years is hardly an anchor because it ends soon and is not all that hard to get out of. Canucks could just hold onto Boeser. There have been trade rumours for like 4 years now yet he is still in Vancouver


I’m sure they will keep him, insist he has value for three seasons, and then watch him walk in free agency.
9 janv. 2023 à 16 h 41
#15
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Isles5513
I’m sure they will keep him, insist he has value for three seasons, and then watch him walk in free agency.


Better than to have to pay to dump him like you are implying.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage