Quoting: mv21227
His value is lower than it has been in the past, yet he’s still playing at a 60 point pace. Let’s use an examples
Boeser: 22GP 4G 12A 16 PTS Habs fans value: Negative
Anderson: 27 GP 8G 2A 10 PTS Habs fans value: 1st round pick/high end prospect++
Monahan: 25 GP 6G 11A 27 PTS Habs fans value: 1st round pick at 50% retained (a bit different as he’s a pending UFA and a C)
Obviously points aren’t everything, but he’s still producing, and is far better than player than Anderson, and his contract isn’t nearly as bad. If Boeser is negative value to Habs fans, why isn’t Anderson? Oh wait, that’s using logic, which most Habs fans on this site don’t use
Listen, bud. If Boeser was as valuable as a regular player with 60 points projection. He would've been gone now, right? Or at least been offered the 13th overall pick. + right?.
Nope. His value is LOW. Low for a 60 point guy? Ya, because he doesn't do anything. He gets the lazy points. From work of his teammates. He's terrible defensively too. And far better player than Anderson is really debatable. Anderson is physical, win puck battles, go in front of the net, speed, penalty kill, power play, shoots well. Great power forward. He's worth a lot because not alot of good power forwards now are available.
Also, id like to add that, it seems you agree 1st at least is OK value for Monohan, right?
Well, if we say daddy is with no value . Than you honestly think that Boeser is also worth a 1st, to match mono? Better yet, Boeser is 1st + 2nd, because Habs need to add a2nd, no.
Monohan is worth a 1st. Dadonov = nothing. Boeser = 3rd. 2nd = 2nd.
It's total fair value imo.