Modifié 15 déc. 2022 à 22 h 53
Quoting: Nathaniel
Seems very hopeful, and I dont really understand getting hung on up all these unrealistic trades. Also, how would this team have fit Eichel is they didn't move Eriksson, Roussel, and Beagle? And to add to that, no shot Eichel waives his NMC for Vancouver.
Good points, never considered that. Eichel was on LTIR at the time of the trade so the trade would go through. As for when he would return, he could either sit out the entire season ( I understand the problems with this approach), or some sort of cap gymnastics may have beeen possible. Ex sending guys to minors, buyouts, cap dumps etc. As for Eichels NMC, he was desperate to get out of Buffalo, and the appeal of a good team in a city like Vancouver might’ve been enough, but who knows.
Edit
Quote
Multi-Quote
2 minutes ago
#4
JohnJohnson
Thread Starter
GoNucks
Joined: Dec. 2022
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Quoting: jedihonesy
everything looks good except the Eichel and Chychrun trades. Both trades were not even reported or even speculated. What is more realistic is us trading Miller for the supposed rangers offer of Chytil, Lundqvist and 1st, which allows us to give Horvat the 8 yr deal. There was also a reported ask from the pens for Rathbone and a 2nd for Marino which would be an upgrade on D.
Quoting: jedihonesy
everything looks good except the Eichel and Chychrun trades. Both trades were not even reported or even speculated. What is more realistic is us trading Miller for the supposed rangers offer of Chytil, Lundqvist and 1st, which allows us to give Horvat the 8 yr deal. There was also a reported ask from the pens for Rathbone and a 2nd for Marino which would be an upgrade on D.
Yes very true, was thinking of doing one of these for Rutherford -Alvin dou. Would probably include both proposals you cited in that one.
Edit
Quote
Multi-Quote
Reply
Add Poll
Page 1 of 1
Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyForum RulesAboutCBA FAQContact Us
CapFriendly
© 2022 CapFriendly.com