SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Reinhart

Créé par: Ledge_And_Dairy
Équipe: 2022-23 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 27 nov. 2022
Publié: 29 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
CGY
  1. Reinhart, Sam
Détails additionnels:
+ Picks/Prospects to balance trade
FLA
  1. Dubé, Dillon
  2. Kylington, Oliver
Détails additionnels:
- Kylington is placed on LTIR so that Duclair can be activeated

+ Picks/Prospects to balance trade
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $73 200 833 $0 $200 000 $9 299 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 nov. 2022 à 8 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,897
Mentions "j'aime": 14,582
Seems like a terrible trade for Florida.

I tolerate no Reinhart slander
29 nov. 2022 à 8 h 51
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,579
Mentions "j'aime": 3,320
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Seems like a terrible trade for Florida.

I tolerate no Reinhart slander


They can afford to move Reinhart if Duclair doesn't drop off significantly from last year. The move frees up cap for them, not just to activate Duclair but they will have 1m or so to work with and would have added a decent depth piece in Dube.

The mock trade is just a skeleton, so can't judge it based off value.
29 nov. 2022 à 8 h 58
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,897
Mentions "j'aime": 14,582
Quoting: GMBL
They can afford to move Reinhart if Duclair doesn't drop off significantly from last year. The move frees up cap for them, not just to activate Duclair but they will have 1m or so to work with and would have added a decent depth piece in Dube.

The mock trade is just a skeleton, so can't judge it based off value.


But Reinhart is much better than duclair.

Only barkov and tkachuk play more than him and he plays almost 2 full minutes more than any other forward.

Move someone else.
29 nov. 2022 à 9 h 13
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,555
Mentions "j'aime": 19,692
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Seems like a terrible trade for Florida.

I tolerate no Reinhart slander


Hence the picks/prospects. I expect Calgary adds value wise but Florida isn't exactly in a great position to make demands and it's pretty much confirmed that they will not be moving Hornqvist. The idea here is that they add LD depth going into the playoffs and next year while also creating cap space, I think they end up with like 1.7M extra in this deal as a 21 man roster. Gives them a lot more flexibility with call ups instead of running a 17 man squad again
29 nov. 2022 à 9 h 18
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,555
Mentions "j'aime": 19,692
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
But Reinhart is much better than duclair.

Only barkov and tkachuk play more than him and he plays almost 2 full minutes more than any other forward.

Move someone else.


Im not sure he's viewed as "much better." They play him almost strictly on Lundell's wing, which is the 3rd line when Barkov is healthy (he's just sick right now). When Duclair comes back he will almost certainly be reunited with Bennett on the 2nd line. It's worth noting that Dube and Bennett also had very good chemistry together in Calgary
GMBL a aimé ceci.
29 nov. 2022 à 9 h 25
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,897
Mentions "j'aime": 14,582
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Im not sure he's viewed as "much better." They play him almost strictly on Lundell's wing, which is the 3rd line when Barkov is healthy (he's just sick right now). When Duclair comes back he will almost certainly be reunited with Bennett on the 2nd line. It's worth noting that Dube and Bennett also had very good chemistry together in Calgary


And yet Reinhart is 3rd among forwards in ice time and was 4th last year

He would be a huge coup for Calgary if Florida is that dumb
29 nov. 2022 à 9 h 26
#7
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 5,060
Mentions "j'aime": 4,105
I'd imagine you'd have to be giving up a better dman than Kylington to acquire Reinhart
29 nov. 2022 à 9 h 26
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,579
Mentions "j'aime": 3,320
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
But Reinhart is much better than duclair.

Only barkov and tkachuk play more than him and he plays almost 2 full minutes more than any other forward.

Move someone else.


Moving Bennett wouldn't make much sense. The other option is just to trade Duclair away or wait and see if someone gets injured before he returns at the end of December.
29 nov. 2022 à 10 h 14
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,555
Mentions "j'aime": 19,692
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
And yet Reinhart is 3rd among forwards in ice time and was 4th last year

He would be a huge coup for Calgary if Florida is that dumb


That's because of his PK ice time and that he is currently averaging 4+ minutes on the PP.

They aren't going to move any of Barkov, Bennett, Tkachuk of Verhaeghe before him and they aren't moving any defense so it will either be him or Duclair that goes.
29 nov. 2022 à 10 h 38
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,555
Mentions "j'aime": 19,692
Quoting: theleano1
I'd imagine you'd have to be giving up a better dman than Kylington to acquire Reinhart


You underrate Kylington, he's a top 4 dman on most teams and he's cheap. It's a shame he's not playing right now to prove that. The point here is that placing him on LTIR allows them to activate Duclair
29 nov. 2022 à 16 h 21
#11
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,837
Mentions "j'aime": 1,855
Will definitely be interesting to see what FLA does

I’d love to reunite Huberdeau with a RW he was previously successful with, especially Duclair or Reinhardt.

Although definitely not ideal, I’m not opposed to Hoffman or Dadonov if we could get them at least 50% retained, assuming they don’t cost much to acquire and we aren’t able to secure better options at the TDL. We should have enough available Cap Space by then.

Then again, we should be looking internally with our available Wranglers before we do any of the above
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage