SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Nylander

Créé par: DDCRAVEN
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 28 nov. 2022
Publié: 28 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Any chance something like this could happen? I know Chicago is rebuilding, but they have tons of draft picks and maybe want someone else they can build around?
Transactions
TOR
  1. Domi, Max
  2. Kane, Patrick (5 000 000 $ retained)
  3. Murphy, Connor (2 200 000 $ retained)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $67 683 047 $212 500 $0 $14 816 953 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
-2 375 000 $-2 375 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
827 500 $827 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
840 630 $840 630 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 nov. 2022 à 17 h 20
#51
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,567
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Quoting: ChiHawk
Let's pretend both Nylander and Kane are on expiring deals this year, same cap hits, no NMC/NTCs in their agreements, I'm willing 100% of GMs that would be in on them would take Kane over Nylander for a playoff run. That said, with Nylander having an extra year, smaller cap hit, that does for sure hold more value to an acquiring team. I also agree that to the Leafs Nylander is more valuable today; you can't just shake up the chemistry of the team.


I wouldn't say 100% of GMs, but probably 90-95% would take Kane over Nylander if they are being brought in as a pure rental.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
28 nov. 2022 à 17 h 40
#52
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,315
Mentions "j'aime": 5,658
Quoting: ChiHawk
Try watching the Hawks game in and game out...90%+ like those in the know; watch what he still does on the ice next to crappy line mates and you might begin to understand what doesn't show up on stat sheets how he creates chances that simply line mates aren't good enough to capitalize on. And if you're a stathead because you don't watch the Hawks much, which is likely what you are forming your opinion on, explain this...

Points per game
18/19 = 1.36
19/20 = 1.20
15/16 = 1.29
21/22 = 1.18
20/21 = 1.18
16/17 = 1.08....6th best year for reference

16 years in the NHL and his 5 best ppg seasons, 4 of them happened in the last 4 seasons, his 2nd best season ever was just 2 years ago. Yeah....Kane is in deep decline for years like you said LMAO laugh

If Kane and Nylander were both rentals this year and available at the deadline to playoff teams this season for equal price and any playoff team could take 1 or the other, every GM would take Kane in a heartbeat for one playoff run. You clearly don't watch Kane play night in and night out.


Take your head out of the box score and watch the games and look at the results.

Besides a lot of kanes production is just from the copious amount of PP time he gets.
His p/60 is in the hundreds among nhlers and his g/60 is terrible too.
28 nov. 2022 à 17 h 53
#53
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,079
Mentions "j'aime": 9,400
Quoting: Random2152
Take your head out of the box score and watch the games and look at the results.

Besides a lot of kanes production is just from the copious amount of PP time he gets.
His p/60 is in the hundreds among nhlers and his g/60 is terrible too.


LMAO you made an asinine statement and the more you respond arguing the worse it gets for you. Kane has always had a ton of time on the PP and in the offensive zone...nothing new. In fact, he never attempted to play defense up until a few years ago when forced to. Try watching Hawks games, more then a few a year and you'll get it.

Done trying to talk sense to the ignorant...good day kid
28 nov. 2022 à 17 h 55
#54
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,315
Mentions "j'aime": 5,658
Quoting: ChiHawk
LMAO you made an asinine statement and the more you respond arguing the worse it gets for you. Kane has always had a ton of time on the PP and in the offensive zone...nothing new. In fact, he never attempted to play defense up until a few years ago when forced to. Try watching Hawks games, more then a few a year and you'll get it.

Done trying to talk sense to the ignorant...good day kid


He had never tried to play D and has gotten worse at it, but his EV scoring is gone too now.

Textbook decline. Im sorry you cant recognize that
28 nov. 2022 à 17 h 56
#55
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 9,315
Mentions "j'aime": 5,658
Quoting: ChiHawk
LMAO you made an asinine statement and the more you respond arguing the worse it gets for you. Kane has always had a ton of time on the PP and in the offensive zone...nothing new. In fact, he never attempted to play defense up until a few years ago when forced to. Try watching Hawks games, more then a few a year and you'll get it.

Done trying to talk sense to the ignorant...good day kid


This is your king? Hasnt declined my ass


28 nov. 2022 à 18 h 7
#56
Seiders on the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 9,890
Mentions "j'aime": 7,764
Quoting: ChiHawk
Try watching the Hawks game in and game out...90%+ like those in the know; watch what he still does on the ice next to crappy line mates and you might begin to understand what doesn't show up on stat sheets how he creates chances that simply line mates aren't good enough to capitalize on. And if you're a stathead because you don't watch the Hawks much, which is likely what you are forming your opinion on, explain this...

Points per game
18/19 = 1.36
19/20 = 1.20
15/16 = 1.29
21/22 = 1.18
20/21 = 1.18
16/17 = 1.08....6th best year for reference

16 years in the NHL and his 5 best ppg seasons, 4 of them happened in the last 4 seasons, his 2nd best season ever was just 2 years ago. Yeah....Kane is in deep decline for years like you said LMAO laugh

If Kane and Nylander were both rentals this year and available at the deadline to playoff teams this season for equal price and any playoff team could take 1 or the other, every GM would take Kane in a heartbeat for one playoff run. You clearly don't watch Kane play night in and night out.


Kane isn't what he once was but he's still an excellent player.
28 nov. 2022 à 18 h 8
#57
Seiders on the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 9,890
Mentions "j'aime": 7,764
Quoting: ChiHawk
LMAO you made an asinine statement and the more you respond arguing the worse it gets for you. Kane has always had a ton of time on the PP and in the offensive zone...nothing new. In fact, he never attempted to play defense up until a few years ago when forced to. Try watching Hawks games, more then a few a year and you'll get it.

Done trying to talk sense to the ignorant...good day kid


Ignore the troll. It takes him an hour and a half to watch 60 minutes. He thinks Matthews' slow start is saving the Leafs money.
ChiHawk et DDCRAVEN a aimé ceci.
28 nov. 2022 à 18 h 44
#58
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,079
Mentions "j'aime": 9,400
Quoting: MoreHitzSeider
Ignore the troll. It takes him an hour and a half to watch 60 minutes. He thinks Matthews' slow start is saving the Leafs money.


laugh He's on my ignore list after his last comment about Kane declining for years...literally one of the most ignorant statements I've seen on here
29 nov. 2022 à 11 h 18
#59
Analytics are good
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 3,604
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: DDCRAVEN
The hope would be to resign Kane to continue to play with Matthews. The US connection.


There is absolutely 0% chance the Leafs could afford to keep Matthews and Kane.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage