SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Draft Deals

Créé par: Prime_Jimbo
Équipe: 2023-24 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 26 nov. 2022
Publié: 26 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
A few draft trades to maneuver for next season.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2775 000 $
3775 000 $
2775 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
2850 000 $
32 500 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
88 200 000 $
46 000 000 $
21 000 000 $
64 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Dvorak, Christian
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (COL)
MTL
  1. Boeser, Brock
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
2.
VAN
  1. Alexeyev, Alexander [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
WSH
  1. McDonough, Aidan [Liste de réserve]
  2. Myers, Tyler (3 000 000 $ retained)
  3. Rathbone, Jack
3.
VAN
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Dermott, Travis [Droits de RFA]
  2. Pearson, Tanner (500 000 $ retained)
4.
BOS
  1. Höglander, Nils [Droits de RFA]
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de COL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de WSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2284 000 000 $79 642 500 $850 000 $850 000 $4 357 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 200 000 $8 200 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 nov. 2022 à 17 h 10
#1
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2022
Messages: 4,138
Mentions "j'aime": 2,288
Habs do that
Just_A_Guess, OldNYIfan, TheRealisticGuy and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
26 nov. 2022 à 17 h 21
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,308
Mentions "j'aime": 25,217
I wouldn't pay to acquire those two guys as the Anaheim GM. Among other things, what good is one full season of Tanner Pearson going to do for us? And with both of them on the IR list right now, and Dermott haven't even played a shift this season yet, why should we expect them to be of any value to us in 2023?
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
26 nov. 2022 à 17 h 41
#3
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,157
Mentions "j'aime": 1,880
Modifié 26 nov. 2022 à 17 h 54
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I wouldn't pay to acquire those two guys as the Anaheim GM. Among other things, what good is one full season of Tanner Pearson going to do for us? And with both of them on the IR list right now, and Dermott haven't even played a shift this season yet, why should we expect them to be of any value to us in 2023?


Dermott has been skating for some time. Bruce had said he could play on the current road trip. I think he is young enough to fit Anaheim's plan and had a minimal cost. He played well in TO with Muzzin and others. I wasn't sold on the fit in Van when the move happened considering Rathbone was thought to be getting looks and now even more of a poor fit with Stillman clogging another LD spot.

I completely understand the take on Pearson but he's largely a toss in with retention. He'd be a solid vet, responsible but can add production on the left wing where I think Anaheim could use a player like him and possibly a trade asset at next year's deadline.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
26 nov. 2022 à 18 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,286
Mentions "j'aime": 1,875
every canucks agm i see has people saying it would take multiple firsts for boeser and now its dvorak and pick ~60?
26 nov. 2022 à 18 h 25
#5
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,157
Mentions "j'aime": 1,880
Quoting: qc14
every canucks agm i see has people saying it would take multiple firsts for boeser and now its dvorak and pick ~60?


It's never been multiple firsts imo. Boeser's deal could be somewhat difficult to move. Maybe a first and a late pick or first alone depending on draft position/who the scouts identify with a draft deal. 3C is a need.
26 nov. 2022 à 19 h 7
#6
down bad
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,154
Mentions "j'aime": 1,430
Quoting: qc14
every canucks agm i see has people saying it would take multiple firsts for boeser and now its dvorak and pick ~60?


Boeser isn’t nearly as good as the positive perception of him was and now Van is trying to shop him before his value takes a much larger hit. Ppg looks good but he’s a known “goal scorer” who has 2g this year.
27 nov. 2022 à 2 h 12
#7
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
The difference between Boeser and Dvorak is whole lot more than a future second round pick. Horrendous for Vancouver…
27 nov. 2022 à 2 h 12
#8
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: DogDayCaps2
Boeser isn’t nearly as good as the positive perception of him was and now Van is trying to shop him before his value takes a much larger hit. Ppg looks good but he’s a known “goal scorer” who has 2g this year.


His rough start to the year consists of 14 points in 15 games
28 nov. 2022 à 20 h 20
#9
down bad
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 3,154
Mentions "j'aime": 1,430
Quoting: Juiceman
His rough start to the year consists of 14 points in 15 games


2g in 15gp for a guy that’s known for scoring goals sucks. I never said he had a “rough start” just saying that he’s a guy that I would love to dump before people realize he sucks / is average.
29 nov. 2022 à 0 h 24
#10
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: DogDayCaps2
2g in 15gp for a guy that’s known for scoring goals sucks. I never said he had a “rough start” just saying that he’s a guy that I would love to dump before people realize he sucks / is average.


I'm sure his production is just average. His shot hasn't been the same since the wrist injury but guess what? Good players adapt. He has changed his game in a way where he can still find success as shown by his point totals
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage