SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

For the love of Gibson get that man some help in the crease

Créé par: GiggywithGibby
Équipe: 2022-23 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 5 nov. 2022
Publié: 5 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
We need someone to clear out the crease for Gibson, the poor man is getting destroyed because the Ducks are 10 ply in front of him. Cannucks fans have been on here looking to dump Myers to get out from under his cap and get a physical player back at league minimum who can play the right side. Myers contract also helps the Ducks next season reach the cap floor and takes one of the openings at RHD.

Myers would play with Fowler to provide some physicality on that line, Klingberg would play with Kulikov for the same reasons. 1st vs 2nd pairing is not in necessarily based on play time, rather focused on defensive partner.
Transactions
ANA
  1. Myers, Tyler
Détails additionnels:
Cannucks get out from under Myers contract and get a league min depth defenseman.
VAN
  1. Beaulieu, Nathan
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Anaheim gets a RHD to take Drysdale's spot for the season
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de COL
Logo de ANA
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $63 712 917 $0 $4 282 500 $18 787 083 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
855 000 $855 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
762 500 $762 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
425 000 $425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 nov. 2022 à 19 h 53
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,994
Mentions "j'aime": 12,320
I would be opposed — a Myers Beaulieu trade would be fine with me but I’d need some value coming back if we are eating that whole contract, innerdivisional tax I suppose you could say
GMBL a aimé ceci.
5 nov. 2022 à 19 h 54
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,411
Mentions "j'aime": 4,014
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I would be opposed — a Myers Beaulieu trade would be fine with me but I’d need some value coming back if we are eating that whole contract, innerdivisional tax I suppose you could say


we could retain a bit, but there's no way we will be giving picks here. We already moved a 2nd to dump dickinson and that's a disaster. Myers is not negative value at a more reasonable cap hit.

I would counter with Moore (neg value) and a 4th for Myers at 1.5-2m retained.
5 nov. 2022 à 19 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 407
Mentions "j'aime": 120
It's an interesting one for the Canucks, Myers w/ salary retained next season becomes a really valuable asset (probably returns a 2nd/3rd), but right now Canucks would likely have to sweeten to move.
WhereArtTLuongo a aimé ceci.
5 nov. 2022 à 19 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 9,007
Mentions "j'aime": 3,490
I think it would be best for ANA to save this trade for next year just in case they decide the rebuild is over, there could be some good options in FA that they would rather be paying. Would also leave the door open for a Klingberg extension/signing.
5 nov. 2022 à 20 h 5
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,994
Mentions "j'aime": 12,320
Quoting: GMBL
I think it would be best for ANA to save this trade for next year just in case they decide the rebuild is over, there could be some good options in FA that they would rather be paying. Would also leave the door open for a Klingberg extension/signing.


I think I agree with this overall

Quoting: Wqrrior
we could retain a bit, but there's no way we will be giving picks here. We already moved a 2nd to dump dickinson and that's a disaster. Myers is not negative value at a more reasonable cap hit.

I would counter with Moore (neg value) and a 4th for Myers at 1.5-2m retained.


We have no reason to move Moore’s contract though so that doesn’t really make much sense for us
GMBL a aimé ceci.
5 nov. 2022 à 20 h 8
#6
Démarrer sujet
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 10,292
Mentions "j'aime": 7,081
Modifié 5 nov. 2022 à 20 h 20
Quoting: Wqrrior
we could retain a bit, but there's no way we will be giving picks here. We already moved a 2nd to dump dickinson and that's a disaster. Myers is not negative value at a more reasonable cap hit.

I would counter with Moore (neg value) and a 4th for Myers at 1.5-2m retained.


Anaheim isn't in a position that we need retention, but if you want to take John Moore and retain for a 4th, I'm not going to scoff at it. That leaves us more room for a potential Klingberg deal. Drysdale is going to get a cheap, short term bridge since he got hurt this year, it'll give him another season or two to prove himself for a better deal, so we won't run into any cap issues.

Quoting: GeneralLandro
I would be opposed — a Myers Beaulieu trade would be fine with me but I’d need some value coming back if we are eating that whole contract, innerdivisional tax I suppose you could say


Dude, I just can't see my guy hurt anymore. I knew this season was going to be rough but holy ****, I didn't think we were going to be brutalizing our goalies. I almost want to trade Gibson somehwere competitive just so to end his suffering. If it costs a mid round pick to get Gibson some help, the send the pick. We have a lot of good draft capital, and we still have a well stocked prospect pool, I could give a damn if the 23 4th turns into the next Troy Terry, that'll be 5 years from now, and we would get help for the next two years from Myers, and maybe he sticks around for a bit after his current contract, so long as he bulldozes the crease, I don't care if we loose the trade.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage