SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Powerplay Ideas

Créé par: Shanesaw9
Équipe: 2022-23 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 26 oct. 2022
Publié: 29 oct. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Montreal's powerplay is currently 1 for 24 (4%). Despite this they are currently 4-4-0 on the season, if the powerplay could get going MTL would get more production from their players and more results offensively. I believe the issue with the powerplay is player usage, not the players themselves. It is not hard to have an average powerplay.

First an introduction to the importance of powerplay production. Some notable players that are struggling offensively are Drouin (2A), Dvorak (1A), and Hoffman (1G, 1A). Here's a breakdown of each of these players production for the last teams they played for:

1. Jonathan Drouin, Tampa Bay, scored 54% of his points on the powerplay.

2. Mike Hoffman, St. Louis, scored 47% of his points on the powerplay.

3. Christian Dvorak, Arizona, scored 35% of his points on the powerplay.

These 3 players need a successful powerplay in order to contribute offensively, yet all of these players are being used incorrectly on the powerplay.

Drouin is being used down low at the goal line or the front of the net, which is probably the absolute worst place you could put him. In his last season in TB (and first season in MTL) Drouin was the powerplay QB from the left wall - this is the only spot Drouin should be on a powerplay (he isn't a shooter and he can't battle down low or in front of the net).

Hoffman has made a living in the NHL off of his dangerous one timer, particularly on the powerplay, yet MTL has him QBing on the point right now which is utterly ridiculous (the powerplay gave up more chances against then it created last game against Buffalo, Hoffman should not be the last line of defence).

Dvorak is barely a feature on MTL's powerplay right now, yet he showed great promise as a bumper player in Arizona. I don't even know what role he plays right now for MTL, the entire 2nd PP unit is dysfunctional with random players thrown together without any structure.

Lastly, Wideman is dreadful on the powerplay right now. This is why they are using Hoffman on the point instead... but why? Guhle ran the PP in junior and just showed off his bomb off a shot. Harris ran the PP in NCAA and deserves the experience over Chris Wideman. Even Xhekaj has offensive savvy and bomb from the point, he should get an opportunity on the PP.

Here is what I propose,

POWERPLAY UNIT 1:
Suzuki (R) - (L) Monahan
Caufield (R) - (L) Hoffman
(L) Ghule

- This PP has 3 shooting options up top in Caufield, Guhle, and Hoffman... if the PK cheats to cover someone then one of these players should get a really good look. If the PK cheats up high then the Suzuki & Monahan, who can alternate in the bumper & goal line positions depending on the side of attack (lefty or righty) will be left wide open. This powerplay would always have an option open for a threat, 5 v 4 it is simple numbers the PK just needs to decide who they will leave open. Currently, with Drouin doing **** all and Wideman useless up top this unit is predictable and easy to defend.

POWERPLAY UNIT 2:
(R) Dach
(L) Drouin - (L) Dvorak - (L) Dadanov
(L) Xhekaj

This unit will be QB'd by Drouin on the left wall, he has proven to excel in this role as a playmaker (he shouldn't have any other role on the powerplay. This is about giving Drouin as many options as possible. Dach down low to crash the net or make plays to the bumper, Dvorak, or back door, Dadanov, if Drouin cannot make those plays directly. It is important to have lefty at the point ao Drouin can make a drop pass to one timer if he is challenged when he attacks the net, I think Xhekaj has a great shot and would like to see him here until Matheson returns. Harris is another option if Xhekaj doesn't work. I couldn't even tell you what MTL's 2nd unit is currently made up of, it is a **** show.

I think this is a significant improvement and it puts players in a role they can excel at rather than fail. Player like Monahan, Hoffman, Drouin, Dvorak, and Dadanov that need to be showcased for trades are also put in the best possible situation to succeed individual which should net MTL better returns (right now they'd be lucky to even move some of these players for anything at all).

Thoughts?
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de VGK
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $74 497 499 $1 132 500 $5 277 500 $8 002 501 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance507 500 $$508K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
828 333 $828 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 oct. 2022 à 14 h 7
#1
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 6,953
Mentions "j'aime": 3,035
Too bad Drou is in the stands tonight!

All kidding aside - I think you are onto something. The power play is too predictable.
29 oct. 2022 à 14 h 51
#2
Habs4Ever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 4,297
Mentions "j'aime": 1,737
Xhekaj can’t even make a pass on the tape when he has no pressure
Definitely not Xhekaj on the PP
I agree Wideman stinks this year, Guhle and Harris should get PP minutes
If it doesn’t work, bring back Wideman on PP1
Dvorak is playing well, Dadonov is just so bad
I would have PP1 : Caufield Suzuki Guhle Slafkovsky Dach
PP2 : Hoffman Drouin Harris Anderson Dvorak
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage