Trade Horvat for nothing. good idea

The Bratt part is where you lose me, but I get it.
Back Bratt and Garland out what else is the add from Jersey? What does a signed Severson look like as an add

NJD decline

Demko is our best player. If you want a franchise goallie, you have to give up a franchise piece. A signed Severson has the value of Garland. Will add minimal value to a Demko trade

No argument with that, but I'd pushed back on Garland/Severson being the same. A sub 30 yr old rhd top 4 with scoring touch will be desirable.
You're not giving up Demko so it's a mute pt

I would say a Garland for Severson is a very reasonable trade proposal. Could add a bit of value either side but at the end of the day it is pretty fair.

Fitz won't do that, just sayin

I don't know what GM will do what, but in terms of value and situation, it isn't out of the question.

Demko is our best player. If you want a franchise goallie, you have to give up a franchise piece. A signed Severson has the value of Garland. Will add minimal value to a Demko trade

Fitz won't do that, just sayin

Jesper Bratt is that piece here.

I'd probably vote against it, but understand the logic from NJD side.



I don't think Garland will help as much as Boeser. If there were a choice.

We need the guy who is better around the net.

Jesper Bratt is that piece here.

I'd probably vote against it, but understand the logic from NJD side.

Bratt is definitely a great player, but he is not a franchise level player like Demko. Demko has the ability to carry the Canucks on his back. Bratt has 1 NHL season with above 40 points

I don't think Garland will help as much as Boeser. If there were a choice.

We need the guy who is better around the net.