SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NHL Analytical Standing Predictions

Créé par: Devil
Équipe: 2022-23 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 7 oct. 2022
Publié: 11 oct. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Continuation of Jfresh's twitter posts
https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1578821817896431616
https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1578806577976311808
https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1578790891795677190
https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1578769277812736000

Averaging the totals from Bulsink Bot, The Athletic, JFresh, Evolving Hockey, Puck, TopDown Hockey, 538, and Hockey Viz to get most analytically accurate point predictions

Atlantic Division:
Florida Panthers: 105
Toronto Maple Leafs: 105
Tampa Bay Lightning: 103
Boston Bruins: 103
Ottawa Senators: 87
Detroit Red Wings: 84
Buffalo Sabres: 80
Montreal Canadiens: 74

Metropolitan Division
Carolina Hurricanes: 102
Washington Capitals: 98
Pittsburgh Penguins: 97
New York Rangers: 97
New York Islanders: 92
New Jersey Devils: 89
Columbus Blue Jackets: 80
Philadelphia Flyers: 74

Central Division
Colorado Avalanche: 107
Minnesota Wild: 102
Nashville Predators: 95
St. Louis Blues: 95
Dallas Stars: 93
Winnipeg Jets: 89
Chicago Blackhawks: 70
Arizona Coyotes: 70

Pacific Division
Calgary Flames: 103
Edmonton Oilers: 100
Vegas Golden Knights: 95
Vancouver Canucks: 94
Los Angeles Kings: 92
Seattle Kraken: 85
Anaheim Ducks: 82
San Jose Sharks: 78
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
3282 500 000 $48 099 277 $0 $1 527 500 $34 400 723 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 460 250 $8 460 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
809 444 $809 444 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
758 333 $758 333 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
768 333 $768 333 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
850 833 $850 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
785 000 $785 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
897 500 $897 500 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
841 667 $841 667 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
897 500 $897 500 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
847 500 $847 500 $
DG
RFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
772 500 $772 500 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
450 000 $450 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
775 000 $775 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 oct. 2022 à 7 h 50
#1
Sway4Vezina
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2021
Messages: 809
Mentions "j'aime": 361
For the Atlantic Division, people don’t realize how close it was last year, at least between spots 2-4. When the Bruins are healthy, they could be just as good as any team in their division, especially with the significant downgrades from other teams. By the end of the year, spots 1-4 should be tight. And again, I think Boston will for sure be in that mix as when healthy, they have an improved lineup from last year. There isn’t much logic to thinking the Senators finish ahead of them simply because they were a 73 point team last year. They’ll develop a winning culture and eventually make the playoffs but only after they have an 80-90 point season, and they improve their awful defense
11 oct. 2022 à 8 h 22
#2
Austerity
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 174
Mentions "j'aime": 56
I agree that Boston is mad underrated right now. There are concerns that Krecji may not be as good as two years ago, and the Bruins being pretty injured to start the season, but come playoff time they still have one of the more threatening rosters with one of the best top lines in the league, good defensive depth, and one of the best defensemen in the league with McAvoy.

I think Toronto has only improved their roster from last year, however, and for the regular season I think it's tough to see Boston being the better team.
11 oct. 2022 à 8 h 36
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,036
Mentions "j'aime": 7,746
So, nobody over 107 points? That doesn't seem likely. Your method has all the good teams getting worse and all the bad teams getting better. Maybe it's not the most accurate way after all?
11 oct. 2022 à 9 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 3,759
Mentions "j'aime": 970
Quoting: CD282
So, nobody over 107 points? That doesn't seem likely. Your method has all the good teams getting worse and all the bad teams getting better. Maybe it's not the most accurate way after all?


Averaging compresses the results. Not sure if point totals are accurate, but standings should be, based on the data.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2022 à 9 h 56
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,036
Mentions "j'aime": 7,746
Quoting: earl08
Averaging compresses the results. Not sure if point totals are accurate, but standings should be, based on the data.

Exactly my point. It's not possible to be "the most accurate" due to the averaging.
11 oct. 2022 à 12 h 32
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,389
Mentions "j'aime": 9,030
If AZ AND CHI both get 70 pts I would be beyond shocked. They actively suck and are looking to get worse. They are going to be so bad it might be embarrassing for the league.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage