SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Boston Pizza Deep Dish

Créé par: Ftksmartie
Équipe: 2022-23 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 31 juill. 2022
Publié: 31 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
In a dreamland where Monahan has a strong enough recovery to put up a solid campaign on the 3rd line with young playmaker Pelletier on the left
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
65 450 000 $
12 150 000 $
1775 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
66 500 000 $
1850 000 $
Transactions
CGY
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
CHI
  1. Lucic, Milan
  2. Välimäki, Juuso
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $72 063 333 $0 $200 000 $10 436 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 450 000 $5 450 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 2
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
800 000 $800 000 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 150 000 $2 150 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
912 500 $912 500 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 juill. 2022 à 2 h 50
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,795
Mentions "j'aime": 19,860
In a dream land you dont move Lindholm to the wing because he is a strictly better center than Kadri who will certainly regress
Dr_Invictus a aimé ceci.
31 juill. 2022 à 3 h 20
#2
Dr_Invictus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,280
Mentions "j'aime": 879
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
In a dream land you dont move Lindholm to the wing because he is a strictly better center than Kadri who will certainly regress


Amen 🙏
31 juill. 2022 à 11 h 0
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 74
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
In a dream land you dont move Lindholm to the wing because he is a strictly better center than Kadri who will certainly regress


It’s simply an option that you know sutter would Atleast try for a few games, my actual thought for the first line would be huby, lindy, and mange on the wing,
31 juill. 2022 à 15 h 8
#4
Rotheisler
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 164
Mentions "j'aime": 14
like the idea of the players, but you can't move one of the best centreman int he NHL to the wing for a less effective one. Not only that, you replace him with e left handed centreman, which essentially takes the puck away from the flames best player in Huberdeau. General line analytics: basically the forward that touches the puck most offensively from the NZ and OZ. not including DZ which is obviously the C, is your opposite side winger as the hand of the centreman. Think about entries, where C bumps it wide to his comfortable side and which side that normally is (there are anomalies keep in mind, there are rules and exceptions). Essentially that winger is the hinge between the C and the strong side winger and needs to be the "playmaker" so to speak. Often, that other winger is the cheaper option where you can put a pure shooter, or a crash and bang type. the line of JG, EL and MT was no surprise this worked because it was a perfect fit into this pretty much widely adopted concept. Taking EL off center eliminates him from as many puck touches down low in the DZ, and also putting a left handed C make JH less effective, that one move would significantly make the line worse, twice over. Also that other winger, because he doesn't touch the puck as much, is more likely to be the off-wing, but not always. This is why the idea of AM, TT, or even SM could work with a distributer like JH on the correct side (LW) to EL (RHC). Just for a true dark horse ill even throw Matthew Cornotto's name in there. He lacks the physicality of MT, but is scorer and cheap, and you do not wsnt him to get that much closer to another year of not signing, where he can start seeing the light at the end of the free agent tunnel.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage