SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Likely Puljujarvi and Foegle Trade

Créé par: Empros
Équipe: 2022-23 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 17 juill. 2022
Publié: 28 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
13 000 000 $
11 250 000 $
64 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 465 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
2.
EDM
ANA
  1. Foegele, Warren
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $82 479 333 $896 000 $2 200 000 $20 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 465 000 $1 465 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 juill. 2022 à 18 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,618
Mentions "j'aime": 3,044
Jesus is Foegele’s contract that bad? I doubt it would cost a 2nd and 3rd to dump 2.75M
28 juill. 2022 à 18 h 54
#2
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
The Puljujarvi trade is dismal compared to other offers from other Carolina AGMs. There's zero reason to trade Puljujarvi if this is the return: just don't sign Yamamoto to a wholly unwarranted six-year deal perhaps?

Foegele trade is pretty bad too given that he's a very serviceable third-line forward. It's either a minimal return to Edmonton or a marginal kicker to ship him to the Ducks. The amount of draft capital you're sacrificing here is ridiculous.
28 juill. 2022 à 19 h 3
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 69
Quoting: Canesfan21_
Jesus is Foegele’s contract that bad? I doubt it would cost a 2nd and 3rd to dump 2.75M


He's a #13 that should be making league min. Carolina dodged a bullet by not keeping him.
28 juill. 2022 à 19 h 4
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 69
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
The Puljujarvi trade is dismal compared to other offers from other Carolina AGMs. There's zero reason to trade Puljujarvi if this is the return: just don't sign Yamamoto to a wholly unwarranted six-year deal perhaps?

Foegele trade is pretty bad too given that he's a very serviceable third-line forward. It's either a minimal return to Edmonton or a marginal kicker to ship him to the Ducks. The amount of draft capital you're sacrificing here is ridiculous.


2/3 of Yams, Pulju and Foegele need to go.
28 juill. 2022 à 19 h 9
#5
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Quoting: Empros
2/3 of Yams, Pulju and Foegele need to go.


Since when? According to who? The cap works perfectly fine if you don't offer Yamamoto a ridiculous contract and flip Foegele to the Ducks for/with a 5th.

I'm not against moving either Puljujarvi or Yamamoto as part of a larger package once Bourgault has shown something at the next level, be it the AHL or NHL. Until then, you cannot replace either player with anything close to equivalent via free agency. Moving them now for the sake of moving them is just foolish.
Ausbear17 et GermanGretzky a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2022 à 19 h 18
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 69
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
Since when? According to who? The cap works perfectly fine if you don't offer Yamamoto a ridiculous contract and flip Foegele to the Ducks for/with a 5th.

I'm not against moving either Puljujarvi or Yamamoto as part of a larger package once Bourgault has shown something at the next level, be it the AHL or NHL. Until then, you cannot replace either player with anything close to equivalent via free agency. Moving them now for the sake of moving them is just foolish.


Yams is going to be expensive, probably shouldn't have even qualified him.
28 juill. 2022 à 19 h 39
#7
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Quoting: Empros
Yams is going to be expensive, probably shouldn't have even qualified him.


If they didn't qualify him, he would have been an unrestricted free agent. They'd have lost him for nothing. Piss-poor asset management.
Ausbear17 a aimé ceci.
28 juill. 2022 à 19 h 48
#8
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,735
Mentions "j'aime": 3,503
Canes pass. If they make this trade, they lose Necas, and Necas has a lot more upside that JP. There wasn’t a market for JP, and the Canes have no need for him.
28 juill. 2022 à 19 h 55
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,106
Mentions "j'aime": 1,689
If you retain a bit of foegele he’s worth something. Difference between bad player and overpaid(albeit by maybe only a million or so)
28 juill. 2022 à 20 h 7
#10
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,783
Mentions "j'aime": 12,442
Modifié 28 juill. 2022 à 21 h 49
These aren't good trades for Edmonton, giving Puljujarvi away and paying to dump a servicable 3rd liner to overpay Yamamoto and sign Chiasson to a ridiculous contract isn't good asset or cap management.
Ausbear17 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage