SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Reverse ACGM

Créé par: SammyB
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 27 juill. 2022
Publié: 27 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I, a Canucks fan, made this team using two trades I've seen multiple Preds and Canes fans propose in their ACGMs.

I think this is a playoff team. We improved our D, progression from our young forwards should help offset the loss of Miller and Garland, and we gained a 1st.

We'll have Horvat, Kuzmenko, Hoglander, Fabbro, and Dermott to re-sign next year with roughly $17M in cap space, so we'll have to dump Myers, Dickinson, and/or Pearson. But that will be easier to do when each have just one year left on their contracts, and any of them could have a good enough season that they're no longer negative assets.

Let me know what you think!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
52 750 000 $
23 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Fabbro, Dante
  2. Tolvanen, Eeli
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NSH)
2.
VAN
  1. Bear, Ethan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Necas, Martin [Droits de RFA]
CAR
  1. Garland, Conor
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $79 851 667 $1 250 000 $2 000 000 $2 648 333 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 juill. 2022 à 11 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,163
Mentions "j'aime": 9,389
Personally I’d want a better piece than Tolvanen in the Miller trade, especially since we’re adding Schenn. We could retain a bit as well, especially since I don’t think Bear gets that much money

Team does look like a playoff contender though I agree
SammyB a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2022 à 11 h 57
#2
Davy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 47
Mentions "j'aime": 26
Canes easily decline
27 juill. 2022 à 12 h 34
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 176
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: mv21227
Personally I’d want a better piece than Tolvanen in the Miller trade, especially since we’re adding Schenn. We could retain a bit as well, especially since I don’t think Bear gets that much money

Team does look like a playoff contender though I agree


I think the value's good, but I don't like trading Schenn either. I'd offer Poolman instead and retain 50% on Miller. Wanted to keep the trade as proposed though.
27 juill. 2022 à 13 h 31
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,539
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Canes pass. I'd rather have Necas than Garland. You can have Bear for a 3rd though
SammyB a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2022 à 14 h 0
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 176
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: Caniac2000
Canes pass. I'd rather have Necas than Garland. You can have Bear for a 3rd though


I know Canucks fans are notorious for overrating our own players, but I really think Garland makes the Canes a better team now. Necas might become the better player in two or three years, but for a team trying to win a Cup this year, wouldn't Garland (a better two-way player and 5v5 scorer signed at a reasonable AAV) be more valuable?
27 juill. 2022 à 14 h 17
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,539
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: SammyB
I know Canucks fans are notorious for overrating our own players, but I really think Garland makes the Canes a better team now. Necas might become the better player in two or three years, but for a team trying to win a Cup this year, wouldn't Garland (a better two-way player and 5v5 scorer signed at a reasonable AAV) be more valuable?


No. Because Garland can't play center, and Carolina's biggest questionmark is 2C. Garland is also going to be more expensive than Necas, and Carolina won't have the cap for it. Carolina will be trying to win the cup this year, but they're not in a position to start mortgaging young players away yet. Aho is 25, Necas 23, Svech 22, Kotkaniemi 22, Jarvis 20, Coghlan 24, Bear 25... this team is still very young. No need to start throwing sh*t at the wall yet.
27 juill. 2022 à 17 h 27
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 1,086
Mentions "j'aime": 488
Quoting: SammyB
I know Canucks fans are notorious for overrating our own players, but I really think Garland makes the Canes a better team now. Necas might become the better player in two or three years, but for a team trying to win a Cup this year, wouldn't Garland (a better two-way player and 5v5 scorer signed at a reasonable AAV) be more valuable?


I really like Garland, and Necas for Garland makes WAY more sense than Necas for Miller, but it really comes down to Carolina's needs. We're pretty set on the wing outside of maybe getting a cheaper LW for the 3rd line, we can pick up a winger in FA such as Milano or trade for a cheaper one and be just fine. But we do need to keep our centers with Trocheck leaving.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage