SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

okay I guess

Créé par: papishark
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 8 juill. 2022
Publié: 8 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Dumb trade imo
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
12 300 000 $
32 300 000 $
11 500 000 $
22 300 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 500 000 $
Transactions
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $71 880 834 $0 $60 000 $10 619 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
848 333 $848 333 $ (Bonis de performance60 000 $$60K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 juill. 2022 à 13 h 13
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,144
Mentions "j'aime": 3,630
Trade makes no sense, 3rd rounder seems like a reach. Seems to be the theme though with most the picks too
CheechYou a aimé ceci.
8 juill. 2022 à 13 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,631
Mentions "j'aime": 531
Quoting: glarson17
Trade makes no sense, 3rd rounder seems like a reach. Seems to be the theme though with most the picks too


Maybe could have been a higher pick but he is better than Leonard and shoots right which SJ desperately needs... and Kunin is bigger/tougher fitting Grier's mold. Former 1st rounder vs 6th rounder.. maybe that plays into the 3rd pick a little.
Kunin had a 2.3mil contract, so is not exactly going to be cheap. It reinforces that there's going to be folks on the bottom 6 going out the door
8 juill. 2022 à 13 h 45
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,144
Mentions "j'aime": 3,630
Quoting: poeticentropy
Maybe could have been a higher pick but he is better than Leonard and shoots right which SJ desperately needs... and Kunin is bigger/tougher fitting Grier's mold. Former 1st rounder vs 6th rounder.. maybe that plays into the 3rd pick a little.
Kunin had a 2.3mil contract, so is not exactly going to be cheap. It reinforces that there's going to be folks on the bottom 6 going out the door


I mean he brings little offense, hasn’t had a good season in awhile if ever. Seems like the kind of guy that doesn’t get a QO especially with arb rights. I have no problem moving Leonard but it seems like a waste of a 3rd
CheechYou et papishark a aimé ceci.
8 juill. 2022 à 14 h 7
#4
train, train
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,013
Mentions "j'aime": 733
Quoting: glarson17
I mean he brings little offense, hasn’t had a good season in awhile if ever. Seems like the kind of guy that doesn’t get a QO especially with arb rights. I have no problem moving Leonard but it seems like a waste of a 3rd

Fully, emphatically agreed. Just really disappointed with this move. Not a good start to Grier's tenure as GM whatsoever.
8 juill. 2022 à 14 h 32
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,144
Mentions "j'aime": 3,630
Quoting: CheechYou
Fully, emphatically agreed. Just really disappointed with this move. Not a good start to Grier's tenure as GM whatsoever.


I’m disappointed with the draft too. Loved the decision to move down and pick up 2 seconds with the depth of that same level of talent. Then they passed up that talent left and right. I don’t get it. But hey, I’m not a scout so what do I know
papishark a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage