Not enough for 2 dumps.

Nashville could end up trading Saros but not until Askarov is ready and not for Nylander

Why trade simmonds when you can just hurry him?

Muezzin isn’t waiving to go to Chicago

Los Angeles doesn't need a RD; right now, one of ours is going to have to play LD if we don't find a decent left-hander.

CHI declines.

who is better that they will get?

-I mean your thread title says it all, why would the Preds move Saros when they have no one in the system ready to step up and be their #1? They're obviously in "win now" mode after trading for McDonagh, so I can't see a world in which they trade 3 years of Saros for 2 years of Nylander.

-Chicago isn't eating 2x$9.4M of cap for you and only getting a late 1st. It's going to cost a loooot more to do that (and that's only if Muzzin waives that pesky NTC!)

-Holl value is fine, team is wrong. I still say no one knows where he winds up - he'll be a post-frenzy trade where a team misses out on all their targets and figures wasting a mid-rounder on him is better than signing whatever's left in UFA.

-Simmonds actually has a 10 team NTC so he's not going to the desert. He's cheap enough that you can bury him or just leave him as your 14th forward at this point.