SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Grier GM Roadmap Sign Marchment Trade Burns Get Bear Holl Puljujarvi

Créé par: CheechYou
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 5 juill. 2022
Publié: 5 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This is a roadmap I'd lay out for Mike Grier to undertake if I could give a realistic presentation at what the Sharks could do this offseason given Grier's comments.

1) SIGN MARCHMENT

Falls in line with his "tenacious, highly competitive, in-your-face, fast, hard to play against" comment today.

2) TRADE BURNS

Fits the mantra of gaining a little cap flexibility while also taking that "few steps back" comment he made by parting with Burns.

3) GET BEAR HOLL PULJUJARVI

Grier still wants to compete, and the first three guys on this list are guys who are available, young, wouldn't cost the moon in terms of assets to acquire, and would help SJ compete but would probably need some time to gel together with the team and reach their potential ("a few steps back to move forward" comment). Sharks could also swap Labanc with Donskoi if they want for more cap flexibility for the following season with Meier set to hit restricted free agency (though Labanc is the superior player at this stage in both their careers). Puljujarvi can be acquired for a 3rd/2nd if arbitration with Kane ends in SJ's favor.

*Knyzhov starts off the first few games with the Barricuda and eventually replaces Megna.
** 82 games is a long season, and I see Eklund and Dahlen swapping in and out for each other in the same spot. A similar situation but more so in the context of injury in addition to midseason-struggles with the combination of EK65/Bear/Merkley/Holl.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
22 250 000 $
11 000 000 $
2775 000 $
1875 000 $
22 850 000 $
22 850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
37 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Burns, Brent (2 000 000 $ retained)
2.
SJS
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
3.
SJS
    Future considerations
    4.
    SJS
    1. Bear, Ethan [Droits de RFA]
    CAR
    1. Leonard, John [Droits de RFA]
    2. Meloche, Nicolas [Droits de RFA]
    3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
    5.
    SJS
    1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
    EDM
    1. Kane, Evander (2 000 000 $ retained)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2024
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de COL
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2382 500 000 $75 778 334 $0 $300 000 $6 721 666 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    894 167 $894 167 $
    AG
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    916 667 $916 667 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    775 000 $775 000 $
    C
    RFA
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 4
    2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    875 000 $875 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Équipe de réserve
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    850 000 $850 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    5 juill. 2022 à 14 h 49
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2022
    Messages: 1,090
    Mentions "j'aime": 492
    Canes accept. Personally I'd value Bear at around a 3rd alone.
    CheechYou a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2022 à 14 h 49
    #2
    Leafs Sufferer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2019
    Messages: 4,073
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
    If TOR is forced into going with a 1A/1B scenario in net, I'm good with this trade.

    All contracts coming off the books next year is a bonus.
    CheechYou et Leafsfan16 a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2022 à 14 h 51
    #3
    Miss YA Killer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 3,834
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,446
    can't see Dallas or any one really giving a 2 for age 38-40 @6 mil for Burns sorry no chance i'd do that
    5 juill. 2022 à 14 h 53
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 1,127
    Mentions "j'aime": 304
    I like this trade just add in Leafs Legend Optimus Reimer and u got a deal.
    5 juill. 2022 à 15 h 30
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 8,184
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,665
    I’d rather keep labanc than take Donskoi. Scored more goals in a fraction of the games Donskoi played in this year
    poeticentropy a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2022 à 15 h 47
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    train, train
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 3,023
    Mentions "j'aime": 733
    Quoting: glarson17
    I’d rather keep labanc than take Donskoi. Scored more goals in a fraction of the games Donskoi played in this year

    Updated, I have that trade taken out. My thought process with that trade proposal (not my original idea, it's RobShark's) is to have the final year of Donskoi's contract expire in time for Meier's extension to save cap space. But it's also the trade here that I feel least strongly about since I'm expecting a bounce-back season for Labanc (not playing with the wrong centerman for him in Bonino anymore) and I expect Labanc to be tradable next offseason with only 1 year remaining and a strong season under his belt.
    poeticentropy et glarson17 a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2022 à 16 h 12
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 1,633
    Mentions "j'aime": 531
    Quoting: Boltsradynasty
    can't see Dallas or any one really giving a 2 for age 38-40 6 mil for Burns sorry no chance i'd do that


    I'm in the: don't trade burns unless it's for actual significant value camp, which is admittedly a small camp, but I want to understand Dallas's point of view here. I'd rather just keep Burns, but everyone recognizes because of his connection to TX and Pavs he would be a good fit in DAL.
    Burns > Klingberg for offensive D, and probably still for the remainder of Burn's contract because he's an inhuman beast who will still be doing this at 40 when his contract expires.
    You're looking to sign Klingberg it's probably at something like $7.5/yr, right?
    So you're saying that you won't take someone better at less cost than what you were going to sign. It doesn't make any sense, but help me understand
    CheechYou a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2022 à 16 h 26
    #8
    Miss YA Killer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 3,834
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,446
    Quoting: poeticentropy
    I'm in the: don't trade burns unless it's for actual significant value camp, which is admittedly a small camp, but I want to understand Dallas's point of view here. I'd rather just keep Burns, but everyone recognizes because of his connection to TX and Pavs he would be a good fit in DAL.
    Burns > Klingberg for offensive D, and probably still for the remainder of Burn's contract because he's an inhuman beast who will still be doing this at 40 when his contract expires.
    You're looking to sign Klingberg it's probably at something like $7.5/yr, right?
    So you're saying that you won't take someone better at less cost than what you were going to sign. It doesn't make any sense, but help me understand


    I'm not at all convinced he now a better all around option for Dallas nor am i convinced he'll be what he is in the next 3 seasons 6 mil is A LOT for a 38-40 yo if he were going on his 34-37 I'd be less concerned
    5 juill. 2022 à 16 h 45
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 8,184
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,665
    Quoting: CheechYou
    Updated, I have that trade taken out. My thought process with that trade proposal (not my original idea, it's RobShark's) is to have the final year of Donskoi's contract expire in time for Meier's extension to save cap space. But it's also the trade here that I feel least strongly about since I'm expecting a bounce-back season for Labanc (not playing with the wrong centerman for him in Bonino anymore) and I expect Labanc to be tradable next offseason with only 1 year remaining and a strong season under his belt.


    I get the idea. Save the cap from the second year of Labancs contract. Makes sense, I just feel Labanc still has more value than Donskoi at this point and that he has a shot to rebound this season.
    CheechYou a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2022 à 21 h 8
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 4,209
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,010
    Burns is only going to Dallas for one of their bad F contracts benn or Seguin.
    I respect Reimer to much to sentence him back to Toronto
    Bear is an overpay
    Lebanc is a sell low. i think you have to hold on an hope to rebuild some value then move him at the deadline
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage