SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Would GMJR do business in a Marino for JT package

Créé par: Pens3lieve
Équipe: 2022-23 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 23 juin 2022
Publié: 23 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Everyone wants JT Miller but unless he’s willing to sign an extension I’d prefer Conor garland
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1962 000 $
3850 000 $
21 800 000 $
32 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
11 250 000 $
47 250 000 $
36 500 000 $
44 000 000 $
14 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
PIT
  1. Miller, J.T. (1 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Miller signs extension 5 x 7.5M
VAN
  1. Marino, John
  2. Poulin, Samuel
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Remember Miller is a rental and Marino is like 5 years younger and on a controllable contract
2.
PIT
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (ARI)
ARI
  1. Légaré, Nathan
  2. Zucker, Jason
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
3.
PIT
  1. Johnson, Tyler (2 500 000 $ retained)
CHI
  1. Björkqvist, Kasper
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
4.
PIT
  1. Hronek, Filip
  2. Zadina, Filip [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (COL)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
DET
  1. Blomqvist, Joel [Liste de réserve]
  2. Broz, Tristan [Liste de réserve]
  3. Heinen, Danton
  4. Pettersson, Marcus
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
5.
PIT
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de COL
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ARI
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de DAL
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $79 578 667 $0 $0 $2 921 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
962 000 $962 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
842 500 $842 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, C
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 42
#1
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,029
Mentions "j'aime": 1,493
How far off are these ideas?
And what are your thoughts on the players acquired?
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 43
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,632
Mentions "j'aime": 1,271
I like this team a lot
Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 44
#3
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,029
Mentions "j'aime": 1,493
Quoting: pensfan21
I like this team a lot


Thanks for the feedback!
I get it’s impossible but how realistic are these moves in your opinion
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 46
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,632
Mentions "j'aime": 1,271
Quoting: Pens3lieve
Thanks for the feedback!
I get it’s impossible but how realistic are these moves in your opinion


Well I think the Miller trade there is a decent chance it happens. The thing is it's really hard to say what's realistic or not. This is definitely what they should do, persue Miller, get some new faces on the team. The issue is I'm concerned Hextall will play it too safe and just run it back. 100% though they should make more moves, take some risks, and have a retooled team next season.
Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 49
#5
Definitely not Jim
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 26
Mentions "j'aime": 12
I get your logic—but I think Vancouver will receive more competitive offers than that. If their ask is indeed for a contributing young roster player, a top prospect, and a top pick—I think this offer is only 1/3 (Marino). Poulin was getting scratched in the AHL last year and still hasn't seen NHL games despite being drafted in 2019—he doesn't move the needle as far as "top prospect" goes. And I suspect the Canucks think there is a team in the top-10 of this draft or the next draft that they can make a deal with.
Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 50
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 101
Mentions "j'aime": 69
Blackhawks might do this, but it depends on if they plan on moving any of the other big contracts (Toews, Kane, someone else?) if they'd be willing to retain on Johnson. If they did retain, they might want a 3rd instead of the 4th.
Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
23 juin 2022 à 11 h 54
#7
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,987
Mentions "j'aime": 3,590
Here’s the thing on JT miller.

If the Canucks target a roster D-man, they need a defender that will push OEL down the lineup.

I like Marino a lot but he would still be 3rd on the Canucks depth chart on the back end.

Imo Pitt would have to heavily add to Marino for miller, probably add an additional pick and maybe a Kapanen.

Also you’d have to drop the picks from Van’s side.

I know he is a rental but he is also one of Vancouvers best players. He’s going to cost a lot especially with retention
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 2
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 5,590
Mentions "j'aime": 3,002
Detroit declines, not fixing a hole on LD by creating one on RD.

You'd have to offer a lot more for Yzerman to give up on Hronek. Drop Heinen and the two 4ths and add Kapanen and Nylander and we can talk.

Otherwise we'd be happy to just offer a 3rd for Pettersson.
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 40
#9
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,029
Mentions "j'aime": 1,493
Quoting: pensfan21
Well I think the Miller trade there is a decent chance it happens. The thing is it's really hard to say what's realistic or not. This is definitely what they should do, persue Miller, get some new faces on the team. The issue is I'm concerned Hextall will play it too safe and just run it back. 100% though they should make more moves, take some risks, and have a retooled team next season.


100% agree.
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 42
#10
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,029
Mentions "j'aime": 1,493
Quoting: Billy12Bob
Detroit declines, not fixing a hole on LD by creating one on RD.

You'd have to offer a lot more for Yzerman to give up on Hronek. Drop Heinen and the two 4ths and add Kapanen and Nylander and we can talk.

Otherwise we'd be happy to just offer a 3rd for Pettersson.


i'd gladly add kapanen and nylander to the trade as it stood lol... ngl i had that thought bc DET could give them playing time bc at this point they just need a fresh start....
like as far as dumping cap I guess i'd take a 3rd for pettersson but if I was trying to get assets from DET it would be hronek or zadina...
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 44
#11
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,029
Mentions "j'aime": 1,493
Quoting: The_Rocket
Here’s the thing on JT miller.

If the Canucks target a roster D-man, they need a defender that will push OEL down the lineup.

I like Marino a lot but he would still be 3rd on the Canucks depth chart on the back end.

Imo Pitt would have to heavily add to Marino for miller, probably add an additional pick and maybe a Kapanen.

Also you’d have to drop the picks from Van’s side.

I know he is a rental but he is also one of Vancouvers best players. He’s going to cost a lot especially with retention


if the $ worked out would you want dumoulin as your new stay at home defensive LHD to push OEL down? like ik it sounds weird but a

marino, dumoulin, 1st round pick, prospect
for
miller
???
pit might eat some of dumo's $ or does Van have another contract to go the other way?
just spitballing rn
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 44
#12
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,029
Mentions "j'aime": 1,493
Quoting: jance
Blackhawks might do this, but it depends on if they plan on moving any of the other big contracts (Toews, Kane, someone else?) if they'd be willing to retain on Johnson. If they did retain, they might want a 3rd instead of the 4th.


i'd take toews as my #3C with retention obviously
23 juin 2022 à 12 h 45
#13
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,029
Mentions "j'aime": 1,493
Quoting: JimBenningsBurner
I get your logic—but I think Vancouver will receive more competitive offers than that. If their ask is indeed for a contributing young roster player, a top prospect, and a top pick—I think this offer is only 1/3 (Marino). Poulin was getting scratched in the AHL last year and still hasn't seen NHL games despite being drafted in 2019—he doesn't move the needle as far as "top prospect" goes. And I suspect the Canucks think there is a team in the top-10 of this draft or the next draft that they can make a deal with.


yeah that's very fair... but you never know what's gonna happen with GMJR... in PIT we learned as much...
23 juin 2022 à 13 h 6
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 5,590
Mentions "j'aime": 3,002
Quoting: Pens3lieve
i'd gladly add kapanen and nylander to the trade as it stood lol... ngl i had that thought bc DET could give them playing time bc at this point they just need a fresh start....
like as far as dumping cap I guess i'd take a 3rd for pettersson but if I was trying to get assets from DET it would be hronek or zadina...


Pettersson + Broz + Blomqvist + Nylander + Kapanen + 1st + 2nd in '23 for Hronek + Zadina would definitely be worth discussing.
23 juin 2022 à 13 h 11
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,900
Mentions "j'aime": 6,397
If you want Miller it will cost Marino, a 2023 1st, and a 2nd
23 juin 2022 à 14 h 43
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,408
Mentions "j'aime": 1,020
You would need to remove the Canucks 3rd and 4th picks and probably add a 2nd from the pens - especially if you want retention. I think if Malkin and Letang were willing to sign at those salaries it probably already would have happened. I don't see Kapanen's salary being anywhere near that low. Not sure that's enough to get CHI to retain that much salary either.

But obviously this would be an amazing team.
24 juin 2022 à 9 h 58
#17
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,029
Mentions "j'aime": 1,493
Quoting: Billy12Bob
Pettersson + Broz + Blomqvist + Nylander + Kapanen + 1st + 2nd in '23 for Hronek + Zadina would definitely be worth discussing.


Broz and blomqvist were our last 2 2nd round picks for reference but I’d def at least have that discussion from PITs side
Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2022 à 9 h 59
#18
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,029
Mentions "j'aime": 1,493
Quoting: TheAlien
If you want Miller it will cost Marino, a 2023 1st, and a 2nd


If Miller comes with an extension than I’d have that conversation
24 juin 2022 à 10 h 0
#19
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,029
Mentions "j'aime": 1,493
Quoting: JSEB93
You would need to remove the Canucks 3rd and 4th picks and probably add a 2nd from the pens - especially if you want retention. I think if Malkin and Letang were willing to sign at those salaries it probably already would have happened. I don't see Kapanen's salary being anywhere near that low. Not sure that's enough to get CHI to retain that much salary either.

But obviously this would be an amazing team.



all fair points…
But lowkey if kapanen won’t accept his QO or a minimal contract i don’t want to see him back…
JSEB93 a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2022 à 10 h 27
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,408
Mentions "j'aime": 1,020
Modifié 24 juin 2022 à 10 h 33
Quoting: Pens3lieve
all fair points…
But lowkey if kapanen won’t accept his QO or a minimal contract i don’t want to see him back…


I can't argue with that. It would actually be amazing if he accepted his QO - that would be a great value and an easy decision. I just assume since it's so low that he would never take it. I might make a team where he accepts his QO and see how much it helps. I would maybe offer him a 1 year prove it deal at like 1.5-2.0mil tops? If he says no try to package him somewhere.
Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
24 juin 2022 à 12 h 2
#21
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,029
Mentions "j'aime": 1,493
Quoting: JSEB93
I can't argue with that. It would actually be amazing if he accepted his QO - that would be a great value and an easy decision. I just assume since it's so low that he would never take it. I might make a team where he accepts his QO and see how much it helps. I would maybe offer him a 1 year prove it deal at like 1.5-2.0mil tops? If he says no try to package him somewhere.


but comparative to expectations he deserves to be scratched lol
comparative to production sure he should get 2M but i think pens management has to get through to him somehow... if he wants to play with Geno and get paid then he has to perform.... maybe cutting his paycheques by 70% will do that... idk
either that or send him to a dumpster fire like Arizona lol
27 juin 2022 à 9 h 26
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 3,408
Mentions "j'aime": 1,020
Quoting: Pens3lieve
but comparative to expectations he deserves to be scratched lol
comparative to production sure he should get 2M but i think pens management has to get through to him somehow... if he wants to play with Geno and get paid then he has to perform.... maybe cutting his paycheques by 70% will do that... idk
either that or send him to a dumpster fire like Arizona lol


Yeah I mean compared to expectations obviously last year was bad. But he outperformed the year before so it's tough to know what you're gonna get with him. I don't know how the whole thing works with QO's and arbitration. I don't want to get stuck paying him whatever arbitration says because it'll probably be too high - but if you can get him to take his QO or a low 1 year prove it deal it's probably worth it. His underlying numbers were actually better this past year than the year before. He had an uncharacteristically low S% which probably explains the dip in numbers, And going from playing with Malklin everyday to Carter and Erod being your most common centers.
Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage