No from LA. We don’t really need or want Pearson back

petey aint a 3c, miller to the wing or out the door

No reason for Arizona to take the $$$ of Myers, or LA to take Pearson and his contract. Doesn't look like a good trade for Pens, taking on the more expensive Boesner in exchange for top 4 Dman Marino.

Los Angeles, with an overabundance of younger, cheaper left-handed forwards, isn't interested in installing Tanner Pearson 2.0

Pettersson isn't gonna play 3C lmao

this is basically what they ran last year, boudreau even said its not a 6-6 league anymore its 9-3. all 3 of those lines would get similar ice time and they are all pp1. either way the point of the ACGM is not the lines

doesnt have to me LA anywhere for some mid round picks

ARZ has stated they will take on contracts for a sweetner, since you know best and ARZ wont do that anymore then just anywhere for anything. could add picks/prospects either side of the PIT deal. no point in trying to balance with picks on capfriendly when people will complain either way, just the main trade pieces involved

Yes, Arizona will take on contracts for a sweetener. But you're talking about contracts that don't actual cost them much actual money if any money at all, LTIR contracts or front loaded contracts.

well then doesnt have to be them just makes the most sense as theyve done it like 5 times in the past 12 months

yes and no, I would rather see a loaded first line with petey, then have bo on a matchup line