SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kings Trades

Créé par: Enrique
Équipe: 2022-23 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 17 mai 2022
Publié: 18 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
These trades any good?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
55 750 000 $
21 550 000 $
21 100 000 $
32 500 000 $
32 500 000 $
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
44 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
34 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
LAK
  1. Necas, Martin [Droits de RFA]
CAR
  1. Andersson, Lias
  2. Moverare, Jacob
  3. Vilardi, Gabriel
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
2.
3.
LAK
  1. Johnson, Ryan [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BUF)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (VGK)
Rachats de contrats
Frais de résiliation
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de BUF
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2023
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de VGK
Logo de PIT
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 662 501 $637 500 $5 045 000 $6 837 499 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 675 000 $1 675 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance150 000 $$150K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance1 550 000 $$2M)
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance262 500 $$262K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $
DD
RFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 mai 2022 à 18 h 53
#26
Démarrer sujet
Iglesias
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 485
Mentions "j'aime": 291
Quoting: Buffalove
Sure, whatever u say guy
I’m not the one who proposed the trade though, am i?
Maybe u should be directing that to your fellow Kings fans who keep moving him in these ACGM deals?

As the original poster that made the proposal, I would actually keep Roy over Doughty.
Its just we know Doughty wont be traded.
18 mai 2022 à 18 h 56
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 7,136
Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
Quoting: Enrique
As the original poster that made the proposal, I would actually keep Roy over Doughty.
Its just we know Doughty wont be traded.


Well I’m sure u could find a team to trade for Durzi or Clarke if u wanted instead
Idk what to tell ya?
You’re the one who chose to move Roy in this ACGM, not me

I just think you’re overvaluing him a bit
18 mai 2022 à 18 h 56
#28
Démarrer sujet
Iglesias
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 485
Mentions "j'aime": 291
Quoting: tkecanuck341
You have no idea who Matt Roy is then. I wouldn't give him up for a 1st round pick. Matt Roy will not be traded this summer.

One of Roy, Doughty, Durzi, Spence will have to go sooner than later unless they plan on carrying one spare forward and 2 spare dmen on the roster this year.
What would you do?
Also Faber and Grans but they wont have to be decided upon at the moment.
18 mai 2022 à 19 h 1
#29
Démarrer sujet
Iglesias
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 485
Mentions "j'aime": 291
Quoting: Buffalove
Well I’m sure u could find a team to trade for Durzi or Clarke if u wanted instead
Idk what to tell ya?
You’re the one who chose to move Roy in this ACGM, not me

I just think you’re overvaluing him a bit

Yea maybe the value is a little high for Roy. Maybe one 2nd rounder instead of 2 makes more sense.
I dont know what Durzis value is but Im not opposed to moving him. Its early too to tell what hes worth.
Clarke isnt really available but if you want him itll cost a whole lot more than the Roy proposal.
18 mai 2022 à 19 h 5
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 7,136
Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
Quoting: Enrique
Yea maybe the value is a little high for Roy. Maybe one 2nd rounder instead of 2 makes more sense.
I dont know what Durzis value is but Im not opposed to moving him. Its early too to tell what hes worth.
Clarke isnt really available but if you want him itll cost a whole lot more than the Roy proposal.


YOU are the one moving out a RD
I’m ok not getting any of them
If the price is right, then sure, we’d be interested
But now that we’ve moved Dahlin to RD,
I don’t think the Sabres are desperate for a RD at all
Enrique a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2022 à 19 h 13
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,550
Mentions "j'aime": 6,145
Quoting: Enrique
One of Roy, Doughty, Durzi, Spence will have to go sooner than later unless they plan on carrying one spare forward and 2 spare dmen on the roster this year.
What would you do?
Also Faber and Grans but they wont have to be decided upon at the moment.


Doughty, Faber, and Clarke are the defense of the future for LA.

Doughty will never be moved. He will retire in LA. Faber is Roy's replacement, Clarke is Walker/Durzi/Spence's replacement. Faber is the only two-way, defensively responsible defenseman in the pipeline. He plays the same game as Roy, but with more offensive upside. Walker, Durzi, Spence, Clarke, and Grans are all offense-first guys. The best of these guys will stick around for the long term.

If you're asking me which guy is going to be moved immediately, I'd say Walker is the most likely. Durzi will be the 3RD next season, and Spence will either be the #7 guy or play in Ontario (he's still waiver exempt). Once Clarke makes the jump to the NHL and gets some experience, then Durzi and Spence can be moved. Same goes with Faber to Roy.
Enrique a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2022 à 19 h 41
#32
Démarrer sujet
Iglesias
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 485
Mentions "j'aime": 291
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Doughty, Faber, and Clarke are the defense of the future for LA.

Doughty will never be moved. He will retire in LA. Faber is Roy's replacement, Clarke is Walker/Durzi/Spence's replacement. Faber is the only two-way, defensively responsible defenseman in the pipeline. He plays the same game as Roy, but with more offensive upside. Walker, Durzi, Spence, Clarke, and Grans are all offense-first guys. The best of these guys will stick around for the long term.

If you're asking me which guy is going to be moved immediately, I'd say Walker is the most likely. Durzi will be the 3RD next season, and Spence will either be the #7 guy or play in Ontario (he's still waiver exempt). Once Clarke makes the jump to the NHL and gets some experience, then Durzi and Spence can be moved. Same goes with Faber to Roy.

Clarke is already signed and doubt hes going back to the OHL.
He cant play in the AHL.
Spence has proven all he can in the AHL and it would be pointless to send him down. But if they want to hang onto all the assets and not use some to address other parts of the lineup then it makes sense.
18 mai 2022 à 19 h 52
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,550
Mentions "j'aime": 6,145
Quoting: Enrique
Clarke is already signed and doubt hes going back to the OHL.
He cant play in the AHL.
Spence has proven all he can in the AHL and it would be pointless to send him down. But if they want to hang onto all the assets and not use some to address other parts of the lineup then it makes sense.


I'd put money down that Clarke plays in the OHL next season. I don't agree that it would be pointless for Spence to play in the AHL. He needs to work on his defensive game. He can go down there and play tougher defensive minutes and even get some time on the PK.
Enrique a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage