Quoting: Bruinsbeatz
I don’t think anyone cares if it happens to Vegas after this season and last 10 games the second line has not been producing look at pasta and halls points and then look at haula, his production is just from him mooching secondary assist off of what Hall and Pasta create on their own ya he’s the definition of an anchor because if there was a better option at 2c that line would be playing better
1. Punctuation is your friend.
2. If you’re strictly going to look at points and make decisions based off that, especially when not factoring in other things such as bergeron being out etc, all i can really tell you is that watching the game is a far better way to figure things out.
I really dislike the “fancy,” stats, but from what I can gather the only stats about line combinations are the analytic junk. But since it kind of seems like rather than watching, and digesting, you came in with a preconceived notion about Haula, and nothing that actually happens on the ice would change that…here we go with fancy stats:
As a line, Hall - Haula - Pastrnak rank -
15th in expected goals against (per 60)
37th in expected goals for (per 60)
27th in expected goals percentage
That’s a 1B line, and an absolute rock star of a second line. If Haula is an anchor, he’s a really bad anchor.