SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs TDL Is this Chi deal fair

Créé par: Rob88
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 18 mars 2022
Publié: 18 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Giordano, Mark (3 375 000 $ retained)
SEA
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
2.
CHI
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Mrázek, Petr
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $74 344 783 $0 $0 $7 155 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
0 $0 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 7
#1
Leafs suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,564
Mentions "j'aime": 894
No
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 8
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 225
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: mauston_atthews
No


How would you adjust?
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 8
#3
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,481
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Nope. Need a 1st or two 2nds to dump Mrazek, a 1st for Fleury and a 1st and top prospect for Hagel (that's assuming we're even willing to trade him). I'd prefer some else besides Liljegren. Maybe Robertson?
mauston_atthews a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 9
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 1,549
Mentions "j'aime": 838
The Chicago one probably isn't terribly far off, probably need to add another piece.

The Seattle one though, you're missing at least another 1st round pick.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 10
#5
Leafs suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,564
Mentions "j'aime": 894
Quoting: Nqutilus
Nope. Need a 1st or two 2nds to dump Mrazek, a 1st for Fleury and a 1st and top prospect for Hagel (that's assuming we're even willing to trade him). I'd prefer some else besides Liljegren. Maybe Robertson?


Quoting: Rob88
How would you adjust?


What he said
Nqutilus a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 11
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 225
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: Nqutilus
Nope. Need a 1st or two 2nds to dump Mrazek, a 1st for Fleury and a 1st and top prospect for Hagel (that's assuming we're even willing to trade him). I'd prefer some else besides Liljegren. Maybe Robertson?


What about including Engvall instead of another 2nd?
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 13
#7
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,481
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Quoting: Rob88
What about including Engvall instead of another 2nd?


Value-wise I could see it, it's not far off, but Chicago is rebuilding. We're going to want picks and prospects before anything else.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 15
#8
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Nqutilus
Nope. Need a 1st or two 2nds to dump Mrazek, a 1st for Fleury and a 1st and top prospect for Hagel (that's assuming we're even willing to trade him). I'd prefer some else besides Liljegren. Maybe Robertson?


That's just what silly fans think. Mrazek has been a decent goalie for a number of years but isn't finding success in TO. So that now means he's worthless and was never good and will never be good. GM's aren't that dumb. To move him now would cost something for sure but I wager there are teams that would welcome him and his cap hit so moving him may be easier than people think. For crying out loud, the Leafs got rid of the much worse contract in Ritchie for a 3rd and got Lyubushkin out of it. So obviously it's not going to be as hard as people on here want it to be.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 15
#9
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Rob88
What about including Engvall instead of another 2nd?


Why do you guys want to jettison Engvall? He's been very good all year.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 17
#10
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
That's just what silly fans think. Mrazek has been a decent goalie for a number of years but isn't finding success in TO. So that now means he's worthless and was never good and will never be good. GM's aren't that dumb. To move him now would cost something for sure but I wager there are teams that would welcome him and his cap hit so moving him may be easier than people think. For crying out loud, the Leafs got rid of the much worse contract in Ritchie for a 3rd and got Lyubushkin out of it. So obviously it's not going to be as hard as people on here want it to be.


It's crazy that people think Dubas is just going to hand out firsts to get rid of a contract (or a couple seconds). It's insane.

Buy him out at the end of the year, saves more than $2M in cap.
Nqutilus a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 24
#11
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Ritzy
It's crazy that people think Dubas is just going to hand out firsts to get rid of a contract (or a couple seconds). It's insane.

Buy him out at the end of the year, saves more than $2M in cap.


Moving him in the offseason won't be that hard. The Leafs weren't the only team interested in him this past off season and one string of bad luck won't erase his career. Once the goalie market is figured this summer teams that miss out will turn to Mrazek to get him cheap. I doubt it'll cost the leafs to move him but the return will be essentially nothing.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 31
#12
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,481
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Quoting: Ritzy
It's crazy that people think Dubas is just going to hand out firsts to get rid of a contract (or a couple seconds). It's insane.

Buy him out at the end of the year, saves more than $2M in cap.


You sir, are intelligent.

Honestly, I don't see why more Leafs fans aren't talking about this.
Garak et Ritzy a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 33
#13
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,481
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Moving him in the offseason won't be that hard. The Leafs weren't the only team interested in him this past off season and one string of bad luck won't erase his career. Once the goalie market is figured this summer teams that miss out will turn to Mrazek to get him cheap. I doubt it'll cost the leafs to move him but the return will be essentially nothing.


You still are going to have to pay to get rid of him. You can't just say "look how well he did in Carolina" when they have one of if not the best defensive cores in the league. I'd think it'd be smarter to buy him out and take a small L than to have to pay a decent pick.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 34
#14
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,073
Mentions "j'aime": 3,511
Quoting: Nqutilus
You sir, are intelligent.

Honestly, I don't see why more Leafs fans aren't talking about this.


Fans want to shed the cap right this minute so they can overpay for a rental. Which is dumb on multiple fronts.

Logan's post above is probably the more realistic result (trade him in the offseason), buying him out would be a last resort.
Nqutilus et Logan_Ollivier a aimé ceci.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 35
#15
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,481
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Quoting: Ritzy
Fans want to shed the cap right this minute so they can overpay for a rental. Which is dumb on multiple fronts.

Logan's post above is probably the more realistic result (trade him in the offseason), buying him out would be a last resort.


Also doesn't help that Flower is unlikely to leave Chicago.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 35
#16
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Nqutilus
You still are going to have to pay to get rid of him. You can't just say "look how well he did in Carolina" when they have one of if not the best defensive cores in the league. I'd think it'd be smarter to buy him out and take a small L than to have to pay a decent pick.


This is what fans want but it's just fickle. Most people love to see the Leafs get hurt and it's nonsense bias. The reality is Mrazek is better than he's looked this season. That doesn't erase the past. He is moveable in the off season.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 37
#17
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,481
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
This is what fans want but it's just fickle. Most people love to see the Leafs get hurt and it's nonsense bias. The reality is Mrazek is better than he's looked this season. That doesn't erase the past. He is moveable in the off season.


He's moveable, but I doubt someone's gonna pay to get him (although I will say GMs can be... interesting)
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 50
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,797
Mentions "j'aime": 10,537
Quoting: Ritzy
It's crazy that people think Dubas is just going to hand out firsts to get rid of a contract (or a couple seconds). It's insane.

Buy him out at the end of the year, saves more than $2M in cap.


It's not insane to say what the cost is. But it is insane to think Dubas would actually pay to do it.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 57
#19
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 225
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: Nqutilus
You sir, are intelligent.

Honestly, I don't see why more Leafs fans aren't talking about this.


They aren’t going to buy out Mrazek lol.
18 mars 2022 à 12 h 57
#20
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,481
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Quoting: Rob88
They aren’t going to buy out Mrazek lol.


So you'll pay some decent assets to dump him? Why not just accept your L and move on?
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 11
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 225
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Modifié 18 mars 2022 à 13 h 26
Quoting: Nqutilus
So you'll pay some decent assets to dump him? Why not just accept your L and move on?


Imo, dead cap space over the next four years is the exact opposite thing Dubas will want for this team. These are our prime contending years, and we’ve been through this exercise several times now with other players. It’s hard enough creating quality depth with term in our bottom 6.

But honestly, this is a moot point anyway, because I think posters saying it’ll cost a 1st to move him are simply wrong. It’s a buy-low scenario not a cap dump. Theres just not enough data here to suggest Mrazek has lost his ability to play in the NHL, and there are plenty of teams looking for an answer between their pipes.

People get amnesia with this team and forget how hard this market is on some players. This team also hasn’t been stellar in front of their goalies on most nights, playing high octane offence. You don’t need to look much further than how Andersen and Mrazek have played for each team lol.

Just my opinion, let’s see how it unfolds!
18 mars 2022 à 13 h 20
#22
Jones is Underpaid
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,481
Mentions "j'aime": 939
Quoting: Rob88
Imo, dead cap space over the next four years is the exact opposite thing Dubas will want for this team. These are our prime contending years, and we’ve been through this exercise several times now with other players. It’s hard enough creating quality depth with term in our bottom 6.

But honestly, this is a moot point anyway, because I think posters saying it’ll cost a 1st to move him are simply wrong. It’s a buy-low scenario not a cap dump. Theres just not enough data here to suggest Mrazek has lost his ability to play in the NHL, and there are plenty of teams looking for an answer between their pipes.

People get amnesia with this team and forget how hard this market is on some players. This team also hasn’t been stellar in front of their goalies on most nights, playing high octane offence.

Just my opinion, let’s see how it unfolds!


Well, we'll see. Who knows, lol?
18 mars 2022 à 14 h 22
#23
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Nqutilus
He's moveable, but I doubt someone's gonna pay to get him (although I will say GMs can be... interesting)


Petry is supposed to be worth a 1st and has been awful. But used to be good. Mrazek used to be good, GM's don't forget
18 mars 2022 à 14 h 24
#24
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 225
Mentions "j'aime": 23
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Petry is supposed to be worth a 1st and has been awful. But used to be good. Mrazek used to be good, GM's don't forget



Exactly
18 mars 2022 à 14 h 41
#25
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Rob88
Exactly


Chiarot is terrible and was completely carried by Weber and still got a 1st while getting completely caved in all season. Manson hasn't been overly good for 3-4 seasons and has value. What fans think on here often is emotional and silly
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage