SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Pens all-in 2

Créé par: LetsGoPens69
Équipe: 2021-22 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 6 mars 2022
Publié: 6 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2023
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 828 206 $0 $0 $1 671 794 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $ (25 000 $$25K25 000 $$25K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
870 000 $870 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
842 500 $842 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
789 167 $789 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
764 167 $764 167 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 mars 2022 à 22 h 58
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
I like the COL-PIT deal

Avs would have to find another C somewhere though
6 mars 2022 à 23 h 5
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
Modifié 6 mars 2022 à 23 h 16
Quoting: UpsideDownQue
I like the COL-PIT deal

Avs would have to find another C somewhere though


Not sure Pens would want to take on the salary and terms of JTCompher and Jost. Just because they have to extent Geno, Letang and Rust in the offseason. Probably gonna need most all of the cap space they can get this offseason.

Avs 3rd line of O’Connor/Newhook/Kappy looks better on paper. And a 4th line of ZAR - Sherwood - NAK

And they save 600k in cap space. They need all the cap space they can get.
7 mars 2022 à 8 h 39
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,699
Mentions "j'aime": 3,017
I also like the COL trade, but agree with the poster above that the Avs would need to find a C elsewhere.

Might make sense to remove one of Jost/Compher and replace with someone like Helm/Aube-Kubel + a late pick or B prospect to even up the value.
7 mars 2022 à 10 h 27
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
Quoting: turtlemountain
I also like the COL trade, but agree with the poster above that the Avs would need to find a C elsewhere.

Might make sense to remove one of Jost/Compher and replace with someone like Helm/Aube-Kubel + a late pick or B prospect to even up the value.


I don’t think Pens have any need for Helm or Aube-Kubel. I looked at both. I think they have players in their organization that are younger and more potential that they would rather give PT too. Let alone to move Kappy/ZAR to acquire then.

Players like OConnor, Zohorna, Angello, Poulin, Hallander, Bjorkqvist, even Puustinen and Nylander. Although I don’t think Puustinen and Nylander fit in a bottom 6 role. They are top 6 or bust prospects.
7 mars 2022 à 10 h 29
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,699
Mentions "j'aime": 3,017
Quoting: LetsGoPens69
I don’t think Pens have any need for Helm or Aube-Kubel. I looked at both. I think they have players in there organization that are younger and more potential that they would rather give PT too.

Players like OConnor, Zohorna, Angello, Poulin, Hallander, Bjorkqvist, even Puustinen and Nylander. Although I don’t think Puustinen and Nylander fit in a bottom 6 role. They are top 6 or bust prospect.


I mostly meant as in warmer bodies and replace Jost or Compher with futures as a return. I wouldn’t want Helm either lmao
7 mars 2022 à 10 h 50
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
Modifié 7 mars 2022 à 10 h 58
Quoting: turtlemountain
I mostly meant as in warmer bodies and replace Jost or Compher with futures as a return. I wouldn’t want Helm either lmao


I don’t think they have any need for them. Or even futures for a contending team. Especially when moving out Kappy and ZAR.

Maybe Burke/Hextall would want draft picks and a prospect. But you can see it even on capfriendly. I’ve seen almost every teams fans post an ACGM wanting them to acquire Kappy.

Yes, he’s in the doghouse right now but he’s super talented. It’s undeniable on the ice. Super fast, wicked wrist shot, decent playmaker, plays physical, and good 200-foot player too.

He’s a .5 -.75 PPG player when playing poorly. That’s a pretty good “floor”. Let him get hot for acouples weeks and he’s a 20 goal scorer again.

If even a fraction of GMs are interested like their teams fans are on capfriendly then a GM would have to overpay with draft picks and prospects. Cause I think, Pens would rather a deal that helps them now. Unless it’s an overpay with picks and prospects. And that’s not Helm and Aube-Kubel.

And if I posted a trade like that then I’d get a bunch of stupid comments from Avs fans. But I think that’s what it would have to be if it was picks and prospects.
7 mars 2022 à 14 h 44
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 2,699
Mentions "j'aime": 3,017
Quoting: LetsGoPens69
I don’t think they have any need for them. Or even futures for a contending team. Especially when moving out Kappy and ZAR.

Maybe Burke/Hextall would want draft picks and a prospect. But you can see it even on capfriendly. I’ve seen almost every teams fans post an ACGM wanting them to acquire Kappy.

Yes, he’s in the doghouse right now but he’s super talented. It’s undeniable on the ice. Super fast, wicked wrist shot, decent playmaker, plays physical, and good 200-foot player too.

He’s a .5 -.75 PPG player when playing poorly. That’s a pretty good “floor”. Let him get hot for acouples weeks and he’s a 20 goal scorer again.

If even a fraction of GMs are interested like their teams fans are on capfriendly then a GM would have to overpay with draft picks and prospects. Cause I think, Pens would rather a deal that helps them now. Unless it’s an overpay with picks and prospects. And that’s not Helm and Aube-Kubel.

And if I posted a trade like that then I’d get a bunch of stupid comments from Avs fans. But I think that’s what it would have to be if it was picks and prospects.


Point being that I like the initial trade but the roster construction element for the Avs doesn’t really work as well (giving up 2 centers for 2 wingers) without other moves. Pending UFAs or young prospects is an option to try to cure that.
7 mars 2022 à 14 h 46
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 2,391
Mentions "j'aime": 554
Quoting: turtlemountain
Point being that I like the initial trade but the roster construction element for the Avs doesn’t really work as well (giving up 2 centers for 2 wingers) without other moves. Pending UFAs or young prospects is an option to try to cure that.


Ya, like said, I don’t think a contending team would be interested in prospect or picks. Especially taking away from their current roster, unless it’s an overpay.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage