SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Covfefe

Créé par: SakuThornton
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 24 févr. 2022
Publié: 24 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
CHI
  1. Robertson, Nicholas
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $78 008 116 $0 $400 000 $3 491 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 févr. 2022 à 22 h 36
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 786
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Can't see Robertson being a part of it. Maybe 1st plus hirvonen? Some lesser prospect. Hagel would be an excellent addition. Have to think dermott would head the other way as well
24 févr. 2022 à 22 h 37
#2
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 44,285
Mentions "j'aime": 25,004
Quoting: In_it_to_winnik
Can't see Robertson being a part of it. Maybe 1st plus hirvonen? Some lesser prospect. Hagel would be an excellent addition. Have to think dermott would head the other way as well


Could Mrazek be a good fit too for Chicago? But yeah Hirvonen definitely isn’t the prospect that Chicago would need. Either Robertson or Knies
Panic76 a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2022 à 22 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 786
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Quoting: csick
Could Mrazek be a good fit too for Chicago? But yeah Hirvonen definitely isn’t the prospect that Chicago would need. Either Robertson or Knies


Dont think they move Mrazek as he has a large sample size of being a good goalie. He needs to take some starts off of Campbell. In what word does Hagel get all that? What evidence exactly? I know everyone player is God according to this cite, but realistically Hagel is a great complimentary winger for really good players. He is not the main play driver on his line. If he is worth that, does bunting get 3 first? Where does it end? Chicago needs a full rebuild. A first in a very deep draft along with a solid centre prospect is a good start.
24 févr. 2022 à 22 h 53
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 277
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: In_it_to_winnik
Dont think they move Mrazek as he has a large sample size of being a good goalie. He needs to take some starts off of Campbell. In what word does Hagel get all that? What evidence exactly? I know everyone player is God according to this cite, but realistically Hagel is a great complimentary winger for really good players. He is not the main play driver on his line. If he is worth that, does bunting get 3 first? Where does it end? Chicago needs a full rebuild. A first in a very deep draft along with a solid centre prospect is a good start.


I didn't just make this up lol.
Mrazek, Robertson, and Hagel are all involved in trade rumors.
https://mapleleafshotstove.com/2022/02/18/toronto-maple-leafs-trade-target-brandon-hagel/

I also think it's in Toronto's best interest to move Mrazek and free up cap space for next season
24 févr. 2022 à 23 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 786
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Quoting: SakuThornton
I didn't just make this up lol.
Mrazek, Robertson, and Hagel are all involved in trade rumors.
https://mapleleafshotstove.com/2022/02/18/toronto-maple-leafs-trade-target-brandon-hagel/

I also think it's in Toronto's best interest to move Mrazek and free up cap space for next season


I never said you made it up. Hagel to toronto makes a lot of sense. I just don't believe he's worth all that. Robertson will be on the team next year with a sub 900k aav. Quite possibly the best addition to the team next season. Also I don't consider maple leafs hot stove as a legitimate source. Again yes to the idea but a realistic price (as stated in the article).

I'd give it maybe a 10% chance Mrazek gets traded in season. Off season? Absolutely but you cannot trade goalies like him before the playoffs. Goalies who can legitimately start games and push your starter are far too valuable imo.
25 févr. 2022 à 0 h 5
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 277
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: In_it_to_winnik
I never said you made it up. Hagel to toronto makes a lot of sense. I just don't believe he's worth all that. Robertson will be on the team next year with a sub 900k aav. Quite possibly the best addition to the team next season. Also I don't consider maple leafs hot stove as a legitimate source. Again yes to the idea but a realistic price (as stated in the article).

I'd give it maybe a 10% chance Mrazek gets traded in season. Off season? Absolutely but you cannot trade goalies like him before the playoffs. Goalies who can legitimately start games and push your starter are far too valuable imo.


Hotstove article contains sources from insiders such as Frank Seravalli (quite accurate).
It's funny, I'm getting pushback on both ends of the spectrum here. Some believe Toronto is giving up too much here, and some believe Toronto has to add a significant amount to the trade. Which is it?
25 févr. 2022 à 0 h 53
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,374
Mentions "j'aime": 9,900
Modifié 25 févr. 2022 à 1 h 0
Quoting: In_it_to_winnik
I never said you made it up. Hagel to toronto makes a lot of sense. I just don't believe he's worth all that. Robertson will be on the team next year with a sub 900k aav. Quite possibly the best addition to the team next season. Also I don't consider maple leafs hot stove as a legitimate source. Again yes to the idea but a realistic price (as stated in the article).

I'd give it maybe a 10% chance Mrazek gets traded in season. Off season? Absolutely but you cannot trade goalies like him before the playoffs. Goalies who can legitimately start games and push your starter are far too valuable imo.


Quoting: SakuThornton
Hotstove article contains sources from insiders such as Frank Seravalli (quite accurate).
It's funny, I'm getting pushback on both ends of the spectrum here. Some believe Toronto is giving up too much here, and some believe Toronto has to add a significant amount to the trade. Which is it?


Chicago has already received multiple offers for Hagel that include a 1st and a decent or good prospect depending on the insider reporting, but regardless it's widely reported. Chicago has declined all the offers. Why would Chicago be enticed to move him unless it's clearly a win for Chicago? You have a 23 year old, on a $1.5M cap hit for two more seasons, and a RFA; absolutely the kind of player you want for a rebuild or retool. A late 1st is a bag of magic beans (statistically less then a 30% shot at actually becoming a NHL regular player), and Robertson who right now hasn't proven anything in the NHL and is fragile given his size. Why should Chicago take a late 1st and Robertson? Are you that convinced Robertson will 100% be better then Hagel? I'm not. I get it, he will be an asset in the NHL, but is he going to better then Hagel? I'm not convinced.

As Andrew Shaw said himself (he's a part-time analyst for the hawks) when asked "Doesn't Hagel remind you a lot of yourself" his response was "Yes, but a lot more talented". Do you honestly think a more talented version of Andrew Shaw on a cheap contract for this year and two more seasons and then a RFA to a cup chasing team isn't worth a 1st and Robertson? C'mon If I'm Toronto I'm doing that all day. If I'm the Hawks, I'm not sold as Hagel is the kind of proven young asset you want for a rebuild.

Last point on hagel. that Leafs writer analysis is not very good. It's clear he isn't watching most of Hagel's games to understand the value he brings to the game outside of analytics. To say he's not fast? Really? To say he's not great in the neutral zone really? I agree though he doesn't have a great shot, but he's a total sandpaper type of player, just like Shaw with a high motor and pretty darn quick. Andreas johnson over Hagel...wow, that's a bad take at this point in Johnson's career.

Mrazek is a overpaid so so backup goalie. He had one, what I would call, good season in Carolina (only 12 games and not facing their toughest opponents) but that was also behind the defense in the league at that time....a lot of goalies would look good behind that defense. Toronto made a big mistake signing him for $3.8M...he's not worth that and they will have trouble moving him. He's a fine backup goalie like I said, but he's not worth $3.8M.
25 févr. 2022 à 8 h 21
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 786
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Quoting: SakuThornton
Hotstove article contains sources from insiders such as Frank Seravalli (quite accurate).
It's funny, I'm getting pushback on both ends of the spectrum here. Some believe Toronto is giving up too much here, and some believe Toronto has to add a significant amount to the trade. Which is it?


Hagel is a very valuable player and would be of significant interest. But when did every player get traded for a first, top prospect +++? 1st rounder is valued more than anything for these gms. Same with Miller. 1st, top prospect, roster player +. I'd rather pay the value for him even though I love the way Hagel plays. He isn't a legit top 6 winger, Miller is.
25 févr. 2022 à 8 h 45
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 786
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Quoting: ChiHawk
Chicago has already received multiple offers for Hagel that include a 1st and a decent or good prospect depending on the insider reporting, but regardless it's widely reported. Chicago has declined all the offers. Why would Chicago be enticed to move him unless it's clearly a win for Chicago? You have a 23 year old, on a $1.5M cap hit for two more seasons, and a RFA; absolutely the kind of player you want for a rebuild or retool. A late 1st is a bag of magic beans (statistically less then a 30% shot at actually becoming a NHL regular player), and Robertson who right now hasn't proven anything in the NHL and is fragile given his size. Why should Chicago take a late 1st and Robertson? Are you that convinced Robertson will 100% be better then Hagel? I'm not. I get it, he will be an asset in the NHL, but is he going to better then Hagel? I'm not convinced.

As Andrew Shaw said himself (he's a part-time analyst for the hawks) when asked "Doesn't Hagel remind you a lot of yourself" his response was "Yes, but a lot more talented". Do you honestly think a more talented version of Andrew Shaw on a cheap contract for this year and two more seasons and then a RFA to a cup chasing team isn't worth a 1st and Robertson? C'mon If I'm Toronto I'm doing that all day. If I'm the Hawks, I'm not sold as Hagel is the kind of proven young asset you want for a rebuild.

Last point on hagel. that Leafs writer analysis is not very good. It's clear he isn't watching most of Hagel's games to understand the value he brings to the game outside of analytics. To say he's not fast? Really? To say he's not great in the neutral zone really? I agree though he doesn't have a great shot, but he's a total sandpaper type of player, just like Shaw with a high motor and pretty darn quick. Andreas johnson over Hagel...wow, that's a bad take at this point in Johnson's career.

Mrazek is a overpaid so so backup goalie. He had one, what I would call, good season in Carolina (only 12 games and not facing their toughest opponents) but that was also behind the defense in the league at that time....a lot of goalies would look good behind that defense. Toronto made a big mistake signing him for $3.8M...he's not worth that and they will have trouble moving him. He's a fine backup goalie like I said, but he's not worth $3.8M.


Hagel is a really solid player, and any team would be happy to have him. I don't think he would be worth the price if it gets inflated. I just really like Robertson, and believe he will be a really good player. Yes he has had injuries but he's still only 20. Players aren't usually scoring goal per game post draft year. And first rounders are great for teams who actually draft correctly. First rounder, yes but not a top prospect on top of it.

You want to talk about Shaw? Well he got dealt while in his prime for 2 second rounders. Was he as talented as Hagel? No, not really but they way he played was much more aggressive and gms value that more than higher point totals. Did He get a first, a top prospect ++ no, that was never even a conversation. I take comments from players with a grain of salt when comparing themselves to others. Remember Matthew Tkachuk said Brady was the same but bigger stronger faster? Yeah..... no Matthew is leagues better. Try not to have the "clearly hasn't watched many games" take as these writers literally have a job to watch players, look at their numbers and make honest assessments. I could say the exact same about you with your comments about Robertson. Do I? No as I will give you the benefit of the doubt.

As for the Mrazek, he hasn't been good plain and simple, but the goalie market is inflated. Is he worth 3.8? Hell no, but I'd rather get some better defense and try to turn his game around. He has had some good years so I'm not giving up on him.
25 févr. 2022 à 17 h 37
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,374
Mentions "j'aime": 9,900
Quoting: In_it_to_winnik
Hagel is a really solid player, and any team would be happy to have him. I don't think he would be worth the price if it gets inflated. I just really like Robertson, and believe he will be a really good player. Yes he has had injuries but he's still only 20. Players aren't usually scoring goal per game post draft year. And first rounders are great for teams who actually draft correctly. First rounder, yes but not a top prospect on top of it.

You want to talk about Shaw? Well he got dealt while in his prime for 2 second rounders. Was he as talented as Hagel? No, not really but they way he played was much more aggressive and gms value that more than higher point totals. Did He get a first, a top prospect ++ no, that was never even a conversation. I take comments from players with a grain of salt when comparing themselves to others. Remember Matthew Tkachuk said Brady was the same but bigger stronger faster? Yeah..... no Matthew is leagues better. Try not to have the "clearly hasn't watched many games" take as these writers literally have a job to watch players, look at their numbers and make honest assessments. I could say the exact same about you with your comments about Robertson. Do I? No as I will give you the benefit of the doubt.

As for the Mrazek, he hasn't been good plain and simple, but the goalie market is inflated. Is he worth 3.8? Hell no, but I'd rather get some better defense and try to turn his game around. He has had some good years so I'm not giving up on him.


Shaw was dealt with a higher cap hit as well, but the point being, Hagel plays a similar game but is more talented. All the sports writers have been rightfully comparing Hagel to Shaw but a more talented version. That said, is he worth a 1st and top prospect, no, but Chicago shouldn't trade him for anything less either as he's a very valuable, cost controlled, young player. Accepting a late first round pick alone would be highway robbery for Hagel; the chance of getting a better player then Hagel in the late first round has to be less then 20% which is just a dumb move.

I disagree on Mrazek. I watched a lot of him playing in Carolina and he's a pretty good backup...maybe around top 45 to 50 goalies in the league, but not a 1B as some suggest but being paid like a 1B. His numbers were inflated in Carolina being the best defense in the league. Now take Toronto, among the top 12 defenses in the league and you can see his numbers aren't great...that's the real Mrazek not the one you saw last year in Carolina.
25 févr. 2022 à 18 h 45
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 786
Mentions "j'aime": 207
Quoting: ChiHawk
Shaw was dealt with a higher cap hit as well, but the point being, Hagel plays a similar game but is more talented. All the sports writers have been rightfully comparing Hagel to Shaw but a more talented version. That said, is he worth a 1st and top prospect, no, but Chicago shouldn't trade him for anything less either as he's a very valuable, cost controlled, young player. Accepting a late first round pick alone would be highway robbery for Hagel; the chance of getting a better player then Hagel in the late first round has to be less then 20% which is just a dumb move.

I disagree on Mrazek. I watched a lot of him playing in Carolina and he's a pretty good backup...maybe around top 45 to 50 goalies in the league, but not a 1B as some suggest but being paid like a 1B. His numbers were inflated in Carolina being the best defense in the league. Now take Toronto, among the top 12 defenses in the league and you can see his numbers aren't great...that's the real Mrazek not the one you saw last year in Carolina.


Agreed on hagel, hope he stays and keeps doing well in Chicago. Easy to root for guys like him wasn't he a 6th round pick out of Buffalo? Great story either way.

Mrazek hasn't had a chance to get in a groove this year( injured in first game, then again in first game back, then covid break), but I agree he isn't great. He should still preform better than he has. I wasn't a fan of the signing as his numbers were inflated
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2022 à 0 h 12
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,374
Mentions "j'aime": 9,900
Quoting: In_it_to_winnik
Agreed on hagel, hope he stays and keeps doing well in Chicago. Easy to root for guys like him wasn't he a 6th round pick out of Buffalo? Great story either way.

Mrazek hasn't had a chance to get in a groove this year( injured in first game, then again in first game back, then covid break), but I agree he isn't great. He should still preform better than he has. I wasn't a fan of the signing as his numbers were inflated


Yes, on Hagel. He got a hat trick tonight too!
26 févr. 2022 à 11 h 50
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 277
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: ChiHawk
Yes, on Hagel. He got a hat trick tonight too!


Hagel sporting an unsustainable 21.3 shooting percentage on the year...so yeah, his trade value is being massively overstated right now. A first round pick is a run away win for Chicago, let alone a first AND prospect
26 févr. 2022 à 13 h 44
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,374
Mentions "j'aime": 9,900
Quoting: SakuThornton
Hagel sporting an unsustainable 21.3 shooting percentage on the year...so yeah, his trade value is being massively overstated right now. A first round pick is a run away win for Chicago, let alone a first AND prospect


LMAO a late 1st round pick is a bag of magic beans. Based on history, statistically a late 1st has less then a 30% chance of turning into a full-time NHL player; any GM that owned Hagel would be a complete idiot to trade Hagel for a late 1st. Draft picks are highly overrated, mostly by fans but a lot of analysts as well.
28 févr. 2022 à 18 h 52
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 277
Mentions "j'aime": 29
Quoting: ChiHawk
LMAO a late 1st round pick is a bag of magic beans. Based on history, statistically a late 1st has less then a 30% chance of turning into a full-time NHL player; any GM that owned Hagel would be a complete idiot to trade Hagel for a late 1st. Draft picks are highly overrated, mostly by fans but a lot of analysts as well.


"Draft picks are highly overrated" OK, try building an NHL franchise without drafting players wink
Hagel possibly the most overrated and overhyped player since Dustin Penner, whoever gives up the farm for such an average player will only regret it in a few months. Buying high on a player with an unsustainable shooting percentage being propped up by Patrick Kane is a noob move
28 févr. 2022 à 19 h 1
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 19,374
Mentions "j'aime": 9,900
Quoting: SakuThornton
"Draft picks are highly overrated" OK, try building an NHL franchise without drafting players wink
Hagel possibly the most overrated and overhyped player since Dustin Penner, whoever gives up the farm for such an average player will only regret it in a few months. Buying high on a player with an unsustainable shooting percentage being propped up by Patrick Kane is a noob move


Ummm, the Hawks aren't building a franchise and that doesn't change the fact that a late 1st would be a stupid move for any GM that owned him based on statistics of what that late 1st will turn into.

The equal value for Hagel right now would be swapping a top prospect for hagel, a guy who hasn't played in the league and is project as a top 6 player...not elite player, but very high level prospect. A guy that has the potential be much better then Hagel; but because he hasn't proven anything could potentially be worse then or not even make it in the NHL...risk versus reward. The team that gets Hagel gets a proven 23 year old kid, high motor, high physicality, and going to be complimentary piece to any top 6...bird in hand move. That's the fair price for a player like Hagel.

That said, Hawks aren't shopping Hagel and have already turned down at least 3 if not 4 offers of a 1st and good prospect. You can understand the logic as to why they wouldn't accept that unless the project is a top prospect. The point is, teams are trying to force Chicago to let go of Hagel with an offer that is too good to pass up. That's where the hype is coming from.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage