SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lines i would use with the new trade

Créé par: LGuy54
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 19 févr. 2022
Publié: 19 févr. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $81 369 783 $0 $0 $130 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 févr. 2022 à 23 h 54
#1
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 3,598
Mentions "j'aime": 921
swap ilya with ryan, reason being that ryan is also a good defensive player, and needs more ice time for dubas and keef to see what they got there
LGuy54 a aimé ceci.
19 févr. 2022 à 23 h 57
#2
Me
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 863
Mentions "j'aime": 254
Wouldn’t take out Engvall, he drives that fourth line
MatthewsFan a aimé ceci.
20 févr. 2022 à 0 h 0
#3
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Now that Liljegren is stuck in AHL and Leafs have acquired a depth D, how about trading Holl+Liljegren+1st for half-retained Klingberg?

They have the cap for it, too.
20 févr. 2022 à 0 h 1
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,892
Mentions "j'aime": 3,372
I'd keep Engvall in the lineup. Maybe have Dzingel and Simmonds on a rotation depending on matchups. They'll likely both be playing when Kase inevitably gets injured.
20 févr. 2022 à 0 h 9
#5
Démarrer sujet
TOR V5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,375
Mentions "j'aime": 1,906
Quoting: justaBoss
Now that Liljegren is stuck in AHL and Leafs have acquired a depth D, how about trading Holl+Liljegren+1st for half-retained Klingberg?

They have the cap for it, too.


I heard Klingberg is bad defensively so idk
20 févr. 2022 à 0 h 10
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: justaBoss
Now that Liljegren is stuck in AHL and Leafs have acquired a depth D, how about trading Holl+Liljegren+1st for half-retained Klingberg?

They have the cap for it, too.


Klingberg is the wrong type of defenceman for Toronto; he doesn't add enough value to Toronto to justify that much of our future.
TrueCanuck a aimé ceci.
20 févr. 2022 à 0 h 11
#7
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: LGuy54
I heard Klingberg is bad defensively so idk


Not bad, per se, but it's not his strong suit. He's a more offensive version of Morgan Rielly, really.
20 févr. 2022 à 4 h 52
#8
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: justaBoss
Now that Liljegren is stuck in AHL and Leafs have acquired a depth D, how about trading Holl+Liljegren+1st for half-retained Klingberg?

They have the cap for it, too.


Quoting: justaBoss
Not bad, per se, but it's not his strong suit. He's a more offensive version of Morgan Rielly, really.


How bout not.

Klingberg is a glorified version of Tyson Barrie - actually calling him a more offensive version of Morgan Rielly is a huge insult to Rielly, Klingberg’s worse. Klingberg would fit in Toronto the same way Barrie did, which he didn’t. He would need 1st unit PP time and sheltered minutes at 5v5 to be successful and that’s not happening in Toronto and not happening for the price of Liljegren and a 1st round pick plus more. Rielly has the 1st unit PP locked down and Sandin has the 2nd locked down, and with Muzzin struggling defensively this season there’s no one to shelter Klingberg with so he just doesn’t fit in.

Toronto’s likely not interested in him and definitely not at the price of Liljegren, 1st, +
Leafs_and_Sens_Fan a aimé ceci.
20 févr. 2022 à 5 h 20
#9
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: TrueCanuck
How bout not.

Klingberg is a glorified version of Tyson Barrie - actually calling him a more offensive version of Morgan Rielly is a huge insult to Rielly, Klingberg’s worse. Klingberg would fit in Toronto the same way Barrie did, which he didn’t. He would need 1st unit PP time and sheltered minutes at 5v5 to be successful and that’s not happening in Toronto and not happening for the price of Liljegren and a 1st round pick plus more. Rielly has the 1st unit PP locked down and Sandin has the 2nd locked down, and with Muzzin struggling defensively this season there’s no one to shelter Klingberg with so he just doesn’t fit in.

Toronto’s likely not interested in him and definitely not at the price of Liljegren, 1st, +


That Tyson Barrie argument isn't exactly valid, because Barrie has consistently benefitted throughout his career by the fact that he's had the chance to play with the absolute elite talent (MacKinnon in COL, Matthews and Marner in TOR and McDavid and Draisaitl in EDM) in the league, which had shown in his numbers massively. Klingberg hasn't had this kind of luxury.

Klingberg has played his whole career in Dallas and have seen many different playstyles, starting from Ruff's and Hitchcock's all out offense, and then Montgomery's and Bowness' very defensive systems. Naturally as an offensive talent a team with more offensive mindset benefits the guy, which also explains the drop off in his numbers from what they were in 2015-18 compared to 2019-22.

Even still since Jan 1st 2019 Klingberg is 16th in all D scoring, 8 points behind Morgan Rielly in a consistently worse team offensively, as since that date Leafs have scored 737 goals compared to 574 goals scored by Dallas. I think these are impressive scored for an offensive D-man in a defense oriented team.

Now I'm not going to say that Klingberg is better than Rielly by any means, but as for saying that Klingberg is more offensive version of Rielly...well I don't think I'm that far off in saying this too. Calling him a glorified version of Barrie is in my opinion more insulting to Klingberg than calling Klingberg more offensive version of Rielly is to Rielly himself, respectively. Barrie is basically Mike Hoffman, just playing the D position. He'd likely be better as a forward. He has more points than both Rielly and Klingberg does from this timeframe but he has basically no defense. Even Klingberg has more.

As for fit...you might have a point there. As for interest...I'll leave that with a quote from Frank Seravalli

Quoting: Seravalli
The Leafs need a right-shooting defenseman to partner with Jake Muzzin and shore up Toronto’s second pair. That unit has been the Leafs’ most uneven this season, including the forward lines. Dubas’ preference appears to be players with term, but that likely will not exclude Toronto from dipping its toe in the water on a bigger pending free agent target, like John Klingberg. But even players with term could be difficult because the Leafs have an eye towards this summer’s business. They have approximately $8 million in space, but will need to pay Jack Campbell and fill third line left wing and fourth line center roles
20 févr. 2022 à 22 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: justaBoss
That Tyson Barrie argument isn't exactly valid, because Barrie has consistently benefitted throughout his career by the fact that he's had the chance to play with the absolute elite talent (MacKinnon in COL, Matthews and Marner in TOR and McDavid and Draisaitl in EDM) in the league, which had shown in his numbers massively. Klingberg hasn't had this kind of luxury.

Klingberg has played his whole career in Dallas and have seen many different playstyles, starting from Ruff's and Hitchcock's all out offense, and then Montgomery's and Bowness' very defensive systems. Naturally as an offensive talent a team with more offensive mindset benefits the guy, which also explains the drop off in his numbers from what they were in 2015-18 compared to 2019-22.

Even still since Jan 1st 2019 Klingberg is 16th in all D scoring, 8 points behind Morgan Rielly in a consistently worse team offensively, as since that date Leafs have scored 737 goals compared to 574 goals scored by Dallas. I think these are impressive scored for an offensive D-man in a defense oriented team.

Now I'm not going to say that Klingberg is better than Rielly by any means, but as for saying that Klingberg is more offensive version of Rielly...well I don't think I'm that far off in saying this too. Calling him a glorified version of Barrie is in my opinion more insulting to Klingberg than calling Klingberg more offensive version of Rielly is to Rielly himself, respectively. Barrie is basically Mike Hoffman, just playing the D position. He'd likely be better as a forward. He has more points than both Rielly and Klingberg does from this timeframe but he has basically no defense. Even Klingberg has more.

As for fit...you might have a point there. As for interest...I'll leave that with a quote from Frank Seravalli


Klingberg would be a great addition to any team but he's simply not worth that many assets to Toronto as he's not the type of defenceman the Leafs need. Now if you were giving him for a 2nd round pick I'm sure the Leafs would jump on that deal but he just doesn't add enough value to justify Holl+Liljegren+1st.

Add to that his contract demands are kinda ridiculous and the Stars are more desperate to move him than any team is to acquire him imo which drops his trade value.
20 févr. 2022 à 22 h 22
#11
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Klingberg would be a great addition to any team but he's simply not worth that many assets to Toronto as he's not the type of defenceman the Leafs need. Now if you were giving him for a 2nd round pick I'm sure the Leafs would jump on that deal but he just doesn't add enough value to justify Holl+Liljegren+1st.

Add to that his contract demands are kinda ridiculous and the Stars are more desperate to move him than any team is to acquire him imo which drops his trade value.


Actually Dallas is not desperate to move him at all. Gaglardi, our owner, wants this team to make it to the playoffs so right now it's likely that they won't be selling anyone this year, but rather they're going to be buyers. Me as a Dallas fan don't think this is a good idea at all as we're far too inconsistent to challenge the likes of Avs in the first round, so I personally am in favor of moving assets like Klingberg for futures as it helps us to be better in the future as this year we're simply not good enough.

Klingberg for a second round pick would be such a joke though. He's still easily a top4 D-man in every team in the league and top pair in most of them. I'd still want a prospect (preferably RHD as we're lacking those) plus first for the guy. Holl was added here simply for cap reasons.
21 févr. 2022 à 13 h 58
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
Quoting: justaBoss
Actually Dallas is not desperate to move him at all. Gaglardi, our owner, wants this team to make it to the playoffs so right now it's likely that they won't be selling anyone this year, but rather they're going to be buyers. Me as a Dallas fan don't think this is a good idea at all as we're far too inconsistent to challenge the likes of Avs in the first round, so I personally am in favor of moving assets like Klingberg for futures as it helps us to be better in the future as this year we're simply not good enough.

Klingberg for a second round pick would be such a joke though. He's still easily a top4 D-man in every team in the league and top pair in most of them. I'd still want a prospect (preferably RHD as we're lacking those) plus first for the guy. Holl was added here simply for cap reasons.


Yeah, I wasn't trying to say he's worth a 2nd round pick that was just an example to explain that Toronto could definitely be interested for the right price but I definitely don't think that price is what you're looking for.

I'm also opposed to self rentals I've seen it happen too many times and not work out. I don't think the Stars will be cup contenders, the Avs are probably the team out of the West to beat and I don't see that happening in a 7 game series.

Klingberg's ask is frankly way too much (8Mx8) for what he brings to a team.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage