SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

MAF Chasing Cup

Créé par: Aussie_Blackhawk
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 27 janv. 2022
Publié: 27 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This scenario also puts us in a position to take cap dumps for picks at TDL.
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Lapierre, Hendrix
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (WSH)
WSH
  1. Fleury, Marc-André (3 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Kubalik, Dominik
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (NSH)
3.
CHI
  1. Holmberg, Pontus
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
TOR
  1. De Haan, Calvin (2 275 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (WSH)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de WPG
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de NSH
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $59 881 714 $452 439 $3 415 000 $21 618 286 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 janv. 2022 à 19 h 42
#1
CUP OR BUST
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 750
Mentions "j'aime": 365
i want to see him traded to the pens because him in a caps jeresy just doesnt look right.
capsfan2121 et Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2022 à 19 h 47
#2
Tintin over 1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 15,931
Mentions "j'aime": 10,168
Quoting: yeboi6
i want to see him traded to the pens because him in a caps jeresy just doesnt look right.


He doesn’t want to wear one
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2022 à 19 h 55
#3
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,302
Mentions "j'aime": 4,479
MAF already has 3 cups
capsfan2121 a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2022 à 20 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
the leafs arnt giving a 2nd for a guy who would be rotating in and out off their bottom pairing let alone throwing in a prospect
27 janv. 2022 à 21 h 13
#5
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
the leafs arnt giving a 2nd for a guy who would be rotating in and out off their bottom pairing let alone throwing in a prospect


It's called depth. & I bet they will give up a 2nd for that type of guy.

Once Muzzin inevitably gets injured in the playoffs again, you don't want Sandin as your 2nd pairing in playoffs with the types of mistakes he made last season.

I don't think it'll be De Haan they go after, but you can bet they're loading up and getting someone for the back end. Use your head and think logically next time.
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2022 à 21 h 17
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Quoting: TrueCanuck
It's called depth. & I bet they will give up a 2nd for that type of guy.

Once Muzzin inevitably gets injured in the playoffs again, you don't want Sandin as your 2nd pairing in playoffs with the types of mistakes he made last season.

I don't think it'll be De Haan they go after, but you can bet they're loading up and getting someone for the back end. Use your head and think logically next time.


no, bottom pairing depth costs a 3rd max. Better guys like Mike Rielly got 3rds last year. Ben Hutton was depth, he cost a 5th. DeHann like depth doesnt cost double what Rielly gets.
27 janv. 2022 à 21 h 19
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: IconicHawk
MAF already has 3 cups


Doesn't make the hunger for another any less, particularly if your a driven professional.
27 janv. 2022 à 22 h 0
#8
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
no, bottom pairing depth costs a 3rd max. Better guys like Mike Rielly got 3rds last year. Ben Hutton was depth, he cost a 5th. DeHann like depth doesnt cost double what Rielly gets.


De Haan can easily step in to play top 4 mins. If you want good players, you have to give up something good.
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2022 à 22 h 5
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Quoting: TrueCanuck
De Haan can easily step in to play top 4 mins. If you want good players, you have to give up something good.


except that Rielly is better, and cost less. If you want depth, you pay depth prices.
28 janv. 2022 à 9 h 39
#10
Roster Architect
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 2,643
Mentions "j'aime": 909
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
except that Rielly is better, and cost less. If you want depth, you pay depth prices.


Just like before, you literally always just say that whatever player in whatever post on here is "bad" primarily because they don't play for the Leafs. Get a new line kind. It gets old pretty fast and you have no logic.
28 janv. 2022 à 9 h 44
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Quoting: TrueCanuck
Just like before, you literally always just say that whatever player in whatever post on here is "bad" primarily because they don't play for the Leafs. Get a new line kind. It gets old pretty fast and you have no logic.


i love how you try and pull this when i am literally talking about players who have never played for the leafs being better. Dehaan isnt very good because he isnt very good. and you are pulling the same old dismissive crap you always do because someone doesnt agree with you because you have nothing left to put into the actual hockey argument.
This is very very simple. DeHaan isnt worth the price because 1-he isnt worth near that much and 2-we have literal examples of better players than him getting traded for significantly less at the time of year where prices are the highest.
the part about saying i have no logic when you cant even comprehend that 2nd point is hilarious and must be a pretty brutal blow to your self esteem, no wonder you are projecting.
28 janv. 2022 à 9 h 57
#12
Go Jets Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 5,453
Mentions "j'aime": 4,197
Quoting: TrueCanuck
Just like before, you literally always just say that whatever player in whatever post on here is "bad" primarily because they don't play for the Leafs. Get a new line kind. It gets old pretty fast and you have no logic.


Quoting: JaredOfLondon
i love how you try and pull this when i am literally talking about players who have never played for the leafs being better. Dehaan isnt very good because he isnt very good. and you are pulling the same old dismissive crap you always do because someone doesnt agree with you because you have nothing left to put into the actual hockey argument.
This is very very simple. DeHaan isnt worth the price because 1-he isnt worth near that much and 2-we have literal examples of better players than him getting traded for significantly less at the time of year where prices are the highest.
the part about saying i have no logic when you cant even comprehend that 2nd point is hilarious and must be a pretty brutal blow to your self esteem, no wonder you are projecting.


Why don't you two simply add each other to your ignore lists? Every other post there is an argument and reports are made. Save yourself the trouble!
28 janv. 2022 à 10 h 0
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,749
Mentions "j'aime": 7,382
Quoting: Rooney
Why don't you two simply add each other to your ignore lists? Every other post there is an argument and reports are made. Save yourself the trouble!


I mean, i was just talking hockey, he wanted to make it personal for some weird reason.
28 janv. 2022 à 10 h 14
#14
Go Jets Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 5,453
Mentions "j'aime": 4,197
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
I mean, i was just talking hockey, he wanted to make it personal for some weird reason.


I'm not saying either side is right, all I'm saying is that it might be beneficial for you both wink
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage