SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If I was Francis At The Deadline

Créé par: DougieGilmour
Équipe: 2021-22 Kraken de Seattle
Date de création initiale: 21 janv. 2022
Publié: 21 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I know he won’t be nearly this active given he’s usually cautious as a GM but I’d sell and sell and get ready for the lottery this year and next
Transactions
1.
SEA
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Studnicka, Jack
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
DeBrusk helps with cap relief
BOS
  1. McCann, Jared
  2. Soucy, Carson
Détails additionnels:
McCann could be their second centre and Soucy a second pairing LHD
2.
SEA
  1. DeSmith, Casey
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Pens will be looking for an upgrade so they can either dump Desmith here or offload him in another trade for their new backup
PIT
  1. Eberle, Jordan (1 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
He would most likely waive for this move
3.
SEA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Järnkrok, Calle
Détails additionnels:
Veteran rental for a young team making a playoff push
4.
SEA
  1. Anderson, Joey
  2. Ritchie, Nick
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Dump Ritchie. We pay for that by giving them our first. The 3rd and Anderson cover the rest
TOR
  1. Appleton, Mason
  2. Donato, Ryan
Détails additionnels:
Two young cheap players we could use
5.
SEA
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
6.
SEA
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (COL)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SEA
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de SEA
Logo de BOS
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de CGY
Logo de SEA
Logo de SJS
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
2023
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de WPG
Logo de SEA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de SEA
Logo de COL
Logo de SEA
Logo de COL
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
2024
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $58 660 833 $0 $57 500 $22 839 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
725 000 $725 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AD, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
900 000 $900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $ (125 000 $$125K125 000 $$125K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
800 000 $800 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 janv. 2022 à 23 h 26
#26
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Here's my counter...

TO SEA: Kasperi Kapanen, Jason Zucker, Casey DeSmith + POJ
TO PIT: Jordan Eberle + Chris Dreiger ($1M retained)
21 janv. 2022 à 23 h 54
#27
Démarrer sujet
TheLeafsAbuseMe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,514
Mentions "j'aime": 659
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Here's my counter...

TO SEA: Kasperi Kapanen, Jason Zucker, Casey DeSmith + POJ
TO PIT: Jordan Eberle + Chris Dreiger ($1M retained)


I’d do that if I was Francis
22 janv. 2022 à 1 h 24
#28
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 14,017
Mentions "j'aime": 4,585
If soucy is a second pair guy the kraken wouldn’t be trading him.
22 janv. 2022 à 9 h 6
#29
Démarrer sujet
TheLeafsAbuseMe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,514
Mentions "j'aime": 659
Quoting: CMcAvoy73
If soucy is a second pair guy the kraken wouldn’t be trading him.


Sure they would. No one on an expansion team is untouchable
22 janv. 2022 à 17 h 57
#30
Toronno Maple Leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 174
Quoting: Chigurrhh
First of all, there are not many teams that have trouble hitting the cap floor (why do people always use this narrative?). It's pretty much just Arizona next year that needs to add enough salary to hit the floor next season. Secondly, teams doing that aren't looking to take players that make more than their actual cap hit. They want the opposite. Guys who make less than the cap hit or can go on LTIR with insurance covering most of it.


People use this narrative because it's absolutely true, teams need to get to the cap floor and if they get an asset out of doing so (no matter how small), they will do it. Buffalo is a prime example of this. And as someone else mentioned, his contract is very buyout friendly. No need to overthink this, Ritchie will be moved easily.
22 janv. 2022 à 22 h 19
#31
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: TheNewAge
People use this narrative because it's absolutely true, teams need to get to the cap floor and if they get an asset out of doing so (no matter how small), they will do it. Buffalo is a prime example of this. And as someone else mentioned, his contract is very buyout friendly. No need to overthink this, Ritchie will be moved easily.


That's just flat-out wrong. The lowest cap hit this year is the Sabres and they are $9 million higher than the cap floor. No team operates anywhere near the floor. It's a false narrative that teams have trouble hitting it. The "give this team a player so they hit the floor" narrative has been wrong for years.
22 janv. 2022 à 23 h 9
#32
Toronno Maple Leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 174
Quoting: Chigurrhh
That's just flat-out wrong. The lowest cap hit this year is the Sabres and they are $9 million higher than the cap floor. No team operates anywhere near the floor. It's a false narrative that teams have trouble hitting it. The "give this team a player so they hit the floor" narrative has been wrong for years.


They literally acquired Johnny Boychuk in season lmao. I'll be back when Ritchie gets moved for much less than the "significant" compensation you've been talking about
19 févr. 2022 à 22 h 43
#33
Toronno Maple Leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 688
Mentions "j'aime": 174
Quoting: Chigurrhh
No one is going to take the contract without significant compensation. He makes $3.3 million in actual salary next season with a $2.5 million cap hit. Just a really dumb contract.


Told you I'd be back when Ritchie would be moved for much less than the significant compensation you were talking about, here I am.
19 févr. 2022 à 23 h 53
#34
Chiggy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,796
Mentions "j'aime": 590
Quoting: TheNewAge
Told you I'd be back when Ritchie would be moved for much less than the significant compensation you were talking about, here I am.


It's basically a second-round pick to get rid of him for next year. That's not insignificant. No where was I saying it was a Patrick Marleau 1st round pick situation.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage