SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fixing Bowmans Mess

Créé par: JordanCGrant
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 21 janv. 2022
Publié: 21 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Kubliak, Retained Salary
11 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Mikheyev, Ilya
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Mikheyev is to reduce the cap obligations going Toronto's way and Chicago takes a flyer on the player whose a UFA at years end.
2.
CHI
  1. Koskinen, Mikko
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Fleury, Marc-André
Détails additionnels:
Assuming Fluery agrees to waive and the trade is agreed to in the next few weeks while a playoff push for EDM remains possible.
3.
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (FLA)
5.
CHI
  1. Dadonov, Evgeni
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (VGK)
Détails additionnels:
Chicago retains salary allowing for Vegas to bring Eichel off LTIR and Vegas gets a better scorer on the wing. As scoring has been a struggle in the playoffs for them. 1st rounder is for the bad contract, 2nd rounder is for the player.
VGK
  1. Kubalik, Dominik
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Chicago sends a pick and the better player based on record of goal scoring in the NHL prior two seasons. Retained salary is for one year not a big hit. The bad contract expires same year as Debrincat, Kane and Toews so not too hard to plan around.
6.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $60 900 047 $452 439 $3 497 500 $20 599 953 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 675 000 $3 675 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 645 000 $1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Kubliak, Retained Salary
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
811 667 $811 667 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
867 500 $867 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 janv. 2022 à 7 h 22
#1
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Just re: Vegas-They can't even afford to tender a contract to Kubalik this offseason. Don't see how that works.

A quick run through though (Just my personal opinions):
-I'd be 50/50 as the Leafs...
-I'd decline if I was the Oilers. I love MAF, but everyone is blaming this on goaltending when there's a heck of a lot more wrong in Edmonton than that (Bottom 6, lack of defence). MAF might raise the ceiling a bit, but even getting into the playoffs is a long shot at this point.
-I'd accept if I was Boston. DeBrusk's QO is outrageous...he's a non-tender candidate, regardless of what wild trades people make involving him.
-Sure for Florida. Why not? De Haan wouldn't be a bad option for their left side either...
-"Meh" on Gustafsson...he's no better than he was last year, when the Flyers got a 7th for him (with 50% retention!).
OldNYIfan et JordanCGrant a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2022 à 8 h 7
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,728
Mentions "j'aime": 19,804
Quoting: Lenny7
Just re: Vegas-They can't even afford to tender a contract to Kubalik this offseason. Don't see how that works.

A quick run through though (Just my personal opinions):
-I'd be 50/50 as the Leafs...
-I'd decline if I was the Oilers. I love MAF, but everyone is blaming this on goaltending when there's a heck of a lot more wrong in Edmonton than that (Bottom 6, lack of defence). MAF might raise the ceiling a bit, but even getting into the playoffs is a long shot at this point.
-I'd accept if I was Boston. DeBrusk's QO is outrageous...he's a non-tender candidate, regardless of what wild trades people make involving him.
-Sure for Florida. Why not? De Haan wouldn't be a bad option for their left side either...
-"Meh" on Gustafsson...he's no better than he was last year, when the Flyers got a 7th for him (with 50% retention!).


1st would need protection for Edmonton at this point. Imo their 1st order of business has to be a new coach
Lenny7 et JordanCGrant a aimé ceci.
21 janv. 2022 à 8 h 25
#3
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
1st would need protection for Edmonton at this point


For sure. I just really, realllllly think that the Oilers need a clear plan to address the other two gaping holes if they intend to do this.
21 janv. 2022 à 8 h 37
#4
Trad Breliving
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,989
That’s a big no from the Leafs.

We can discuss a Hagel deal, but no one else is really all that interesting.
21 janv. 2022 à 9 h 46
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 176
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: Lenny7
Just re: Vegas-They can't even afford to tender a contract to Kubalik this offseason. Don't see how that works.

A quick run through though (Just my personal opinions):
-I'd be 50/50 as the Leafs...
-I'd decline if I was the Oilers. I love MAF, but everyone is blaming this on goaltending when there's a heck of a lot more wrong in Edmonton than that (Bottom 6, lack of defence). MAF might raise the ceiling a bit, but even getting into the playoffs is a long shot at this point.
-I'd accept if I was Boston. DeBrusk's QO is outrageous...he's a non-tender candidate, regardless of what wild trades people make involving him.
-Sure for Florida. Why not? De Haan wouldn't be a bad option for their left side either...
-"Meh" on Gustafsson...he's no better than he was last year, when the Flyers got a 7th for him (with 50% retention!).


On Vegas, they're so focused on winning the cup that they take the help for this year and pay the price for shedding a contract which they have to shed just to ice their roster this year. They will have to make extra difficult choices in the offseason whether thats trading McNabb, Karlsson, or one of their top scorers like Max.

Fair point on Edmonton both of you. The pick would have to be protected on their side and they have issues with depth scoring and need another defender. You could argue they could use pretty much of any of the big three MAF, Kubliak or DeHaan. It depends if Holland feels like this season has to be saved or if they're better keeping their draft capital.

Even better point on Gustaffsson, I forgot he went for a 7th last year. You could argue his season is better this year than last, but given the trade last year, hard to get that much of a jump in value without something closer to his 60 point season.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage