SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Staying Competitive While Selling at the Deadline

Créé par: hockeybadger
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 17 janv. 2022
Publié: 18 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Defensive restructuring is very important to get the Canucks to a Stanley Cup contention level. The trade deadline is a great spot to start the movement for this.

Per Frank Seravalli, the Rangers have been all over the Miller talks. NYR has a huge surplus of RHD and apparently value Schneider more than Lundkvist. If this is true, the Canucks NEED to have him as part of a package for Miller. He is the exact type of defenseman the right side of the Canucks defense desperately needs and Bruce Boudreau has been clamoring for.

Continuing on the theme of the tire-fire right side of the Canucks defense, if there is any possibility to trade one of Poolman or Hamonic, it needs to be done. Even if at worst case scenario it's a swap of either of those two for a forward or another defenseman with a bad contract it has to be explored. If they can't be traded then, as Elliotte Freidman said on Donnie and Dhali, a guy like Luke Schenn could garner some interest with a late round pick. You have to do that if there's interest and you still have Poolman and Hamonic on the team.

Motte is another piece that should be moved and teams that have seen what he can do in the playoffs (and could be interested) are St. Louis, Minnesota, and Vegas. I'm not sure the exact return he could salvage, but a 3rd Round Pick, or if a bidding war happens, a 2nd Round Pick would be adequate.

Lastly, we saw teams like San Jose and Columbus use their remaining cap space to broker three way deals where they retain 25% of salary for players in exchange for a mid round pick. Canucks should 100% be in on this. Look at candidates like Joe Pavelski, Claude Giroux, Marc-Andre Fleury (not if he's going to EDM), or Giordano.

I'd love to hear your opinions on these moves or see other potential ways the Canucks could acquire assets while staying competitive!
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Lundkvist, Nils
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (STL)
NYR
  1. Miller, J.T. (2 625 000 $ retained)
2.
VAN
  1. Walker, Nathan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (STL)
3.
VAN
  1. Pavelski, Joe (3 500 000 $ retained)
DAL
    Three-Way Trade
    4.
    VAN
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
    BOS
    1. Pavelski, Joe (1 250 000 $ retained)
    Détails additionnels:
    Three-Way Trade Pt. 2
    5.
    VAN
    1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
    ANA
    1. Poolman, Tucker
    Détails additionnels:
    Send him or Hamonic to a Hockey Man TM (Not Anaheim, just using as a placeholder)
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Frais appliqués
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de STL
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de STL
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2023
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    2024
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de VAN
    Logo de ANA
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $74 503 159 $648 780 $4 332 500 $6 996 841 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    AG
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    AD, AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    725 000 $725 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blues de St-Louis
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    750 000 $750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
    762 500 $762 500 $
    DD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    18 janv. 2022 à 0 h 24
    #1
    Xercuses
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2021
    Messages: 13,506
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,616
    Blues don’t have enough cap space I’m pretty sure
    18 janv. 2022 à 0 h 27
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    hockeybadger
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 311
    Mentions "j'aime": 83
    Quoting: xercuses
    Blues don’t have enough cap space I’m pretty sure


    I haven't done the move from a Blues standpoint yet, but that could be the case. I put Walker in there to try to balance the salary a bit, but yeah STL is very close to the Cap.
    xercuses a aimé ceci.
    18 janv. 2022 à 0 h 28
    #3
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 30,485
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,714
    Hard pass from the Blues. No cap, no need and Motte is hardly better than Walker, if at all.
    18 janv. 2022 à 0 h 31
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    hockeybadger
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2018
    Messages: 311
    Mentions "j'aime": 83
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Hard pass from the Blues. No cap, no need and Motte is hardly better than Walker, if at all.


    Look I was just speculating off of teams who saw what he could do in the playoffs, so it's all good lol

    I wouldn't down play Motte that much though
    18 janv. 2022 à 1 h 8
    #5
    mokumboi
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 30,485
    Mentions "j'aime": 11,714
    Quoting: telmax
    Look I was just speculating off of teams who saw what he could do in the playoffs, so it's all good lol

    I wouldn't down play Motte that much though


    Why? At best, he's an average 4th liner. Probably not even that, as he seems to have stopped hitting people.
    18 janv. 2022 à 1 h 11
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2016
    Messages: 1,631
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,228
    I think Lundkvist is the wrong defenseman to go after and would not make a good partner for Hughes, IMO. Hughes needs a younger Tanev or Schenn to cover the defense while he does his thing. Lundkvist looks to be more of an offence type defenseman.
    Nighthawk a aimé ceci.
    18 janv. 2022 à 1 h 17
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2017
    Messages: 3,262
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,101
    I'm not convinced that Lundkvist is what we need. Hughes and OEL are the puckmovers that this blue line is built around and if he's going to make it into the top-4 eventually it's going to be with one of them. I don't think he's a fit there and it's why Schneider makes more sense.

    I agree with your take on RD; move someone for an equivalent contract that can hopefully bounce back like we did with Gudbranson for Pearson. I don't think Poolman has been as bad as people say and I would prefer Hamonic moves, but I'll take what we can get. We should keep Schenn though. He's a guy who wanted to come here and he actually brings some toughness to the team. He keeps his game simple when playing higher in the lineup and is very cheap. No need to move him considering the return will be a late pick.

    I would move Motte but only if we can't re-sign him. If he signs for under 2M for 2-3 years then we should keep him. If he wants to test the market then recoup an asset. I wouldn't be surprised if we got a pick as high as a 2nd for him.

    If we have the space then we should absolutely buy a pick with our cap space.
    18 janv. 2022 à 2 h 55
    #8
    2018 Canucks
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 2,195
    Mentions "j'aime": 755
    Quoting: audiodave
    I think Lundkvist is the wrong defenseman to go after and would not make a good partner for Hughes, IMO. Hughes needs a younger Tanev or Schenn to cover the defense while he does his thing. Lundkvist looks to be more of an offence type defenseman.

    Besides retaining for Miller it’s not enough.
    18 janv. 2022 à 4 h 44
    #9
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2021
    Messages: 12,418
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,631
    Quoting: mokumboi
    Hard pass from the Blues. No cap, no need and Motte is hardly better than Walker, if at all.


    I'll admit I don't know much about walker, but Motte is recognized around the league as a premiere bottom six role player, Walker hasn't built up that kind of reputation to garner comparable value yet if he ever does
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage