SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

never done carolina before so why not

Créé par: islandersfan14
Équipe: 2022-23 Hurricanes de la Caroline
Date de création initiale: 9 déc. 2021
Publié: 9 déc. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
tbh i dont even know what Carolina lines look like so just let me know if the lines are nothing like how they are supposed to look. ik none of this could happen
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 500 000 $
55 500 000 $
42 500 000 $
42 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
36 125 000 $
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CAR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de ANA
Logo de CAR
Logo de CBJ
2023
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
2024
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
Logo de CAR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2082 500 000 $81 166 917 $112 500 $500 000 $1 333 083 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 460 250 $8 460 250 $
C
UFA - 2
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 025 000 $4 025 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 050 000 $4 050 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 déc. 2021 à 9 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,935
Mentions "j'aime": 8,572
i think Necas is mostly a RW and won’t play C for a while
9 déc. 2021 à 10 h 16
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,284
Mentions "j'aime": 2,971
the contracts and numbers arent good.

Then the lines. Staal is a center
9 déc. 2021 à 11 h 34
#3
Mark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 751
Mentions "j'aime": 323
I can't see Kotkaniemi at $5.5 per for 5 years.

I don't have a horse in this race, but I honestly think that, if given the opportunity to do it all over again, both the Hurricanes and Kotkaniemi wouldn't have signed that offer sheet. The Hurricanes are now saddled with a $6 million dollar player that plays a shade over 7 minutes a night on the fourth line and hardly ever contributes offensively. I am sure that, as the season progresses and the playoffs approach, the would have wished they had an extra $6 million under the cap to allocate towards a better asset. Kotkaniemi, who was mad at how little playing time he received during his time in Montreal, is now getting 7 minutes a night on the 4th line instead of receiving second-line minutes in Montreal. Now, that can't be good for his development. Yes, he cashed in. But at what cost?
9 déc. 2021 à 12 h 17
#4
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,674
Mentions "j'aime": 3,485
Quoting: markmws
I can't see Kotkaniemi at $5.5 per for 5 years.

I don't have a horse in this race, but I honestly think that, if given the opportunity to do it all over again, both the Hurricanes and Kotkaniemi wouldn't have signed that offer sheet. The Hurricanes are now saddled with a $6 million dollar player that plays a shade over 7 minutes a night on the fourth line and hardly ever contributes offensively. I am sure that, as the season progresses and the playoffs approach, the would have wished they had an extra $6 million under the cap to allocate towards a better asset. Kotkaniemi, who was mad at how little playing time he received during his time in Montreal, is now getting 7 minutes a night on the 4th line instead of receiving second-line minutes in Montreal. Now, that can't be good for his development. Yes, he cashed in. But at what cost?


You should probably actually look at KK stats before you make such an ignorant statement. While he is playing on the 4th line right now, he has been one of our best players in the last few games. The canes would not redo this, as they took out a part of a possible contending threat in MTL. But more importantly, KK is being primed to take over 2C depending on how Trocheck’s year goes. This is just a conditioning year for KK, and him not producing just falls into the Canes plan. They will resign him long term at a cheaper cap hit with the bet he will start to pick up the scoring pace next year.
9 déc. 2021 à 16 h 53
#5
Mark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 751
Mentions "j'aime": 323
Quoting: evelutions2
You should probably actually look at KK stats before you make such an ignorant statement. While he is playing on the 4th line right now, he has been one of our best players in the last few games. The canes would not redo this, as they took out a part of a possible contending threat in MTL. But more importantly, KK is being primed to take over 2C depending on how Trocheck’s year goes. This is just a conditioning year for KK, and him not producing just falls into the Canes plan. They will resign him long term at a cheaper cap hit with the bet he will start to pick up the scoring pace next year.


So, just to summarize your statement: Kotkaniemi not producing falls under the Canes plans??? Is that right??? $6 million under a cap during a year they are contending,and him not producing falls under their plan???? Really??? Like.....really????
9 déc. 2021 à 17 h 8
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,555
Mentions "j'aime": 5,042
Quoting: markmws
So, just to summarize your statement: Kotkaniemi not producing falls under the Canes plans??? Is that right??? $6 million under a cap during a year they are contending,and him not producing falls under their plan???? Really??? Like.....really????


Since moving to C, KK is producing at a 0.75 PPG rate, or a 60+ point rate. That's production, my friend
9 déc. 2021 à 17 h 53
#7
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,674
Mentions "j'aime": 3,485
Quoting: markmws
So, just to summarize your statement: Kotkaniemi not producing falls under the Canes plans??? Is that right??? $6 million under a cap during a year they are contending,and him not producing falls under their plan???? Really??? Like.....really????

It just gives the canes an opportunity to give him an even lower cap hit on his next contract. Which in turn makes it so that the canes can spend more on other players, such as Necas and Trocheck.
10 déc. 2021 à 5 h 39
#8
Mark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 751
Mentions "j'aime": 323
Quoting: Caniac2000
Since moving to C, KK is producing at a 0.75 PPG rate, or a 60+ point rate. That's production, my friend


GREAT! If he's producing that much, let's see him more than 7 minutes, right? I mean, why aren't they playing him more? 0.75 is production, so why only play him 7 minutes? What's he doing wrong?

I'm reading his stats as we speak. He's got a CF% of 58.6, which is great. Now, the percentage of time that he starts in the offensive zone is 67.4%. I have no issue with that: they're sheltering him, and that's great. Long term, I am not 100% sure that will help him to become a great 2-way center. It could! Nobody can be certain. If I were running the Hurricanes, I personally would not have signed him because I personally would see this season (and long-term) as a "go-for-it" season, and $6million could be used in any number of ways to improve their team.

Quoting: evelutions2
It just gives the canes an opportunity to give him an even lower cap hit on his next contract. Which in turn makes it so that the canes can spend more on other players, such as Necas and Trocheck.


Look, the Hurricanes are a great team. I have nothing against them or Kotkaniemi. I guess, if you are a Hurricanes fan, you have to ask yourself if Kotkaniemi, for this season, at $6 million, puts you in a better position to win a Cup then say someone else who produces at a $6 million dollar clip.

To put this into context, here is a short list of players who are making less than Kotkaniemi: Larkin, Dumba, Brodin, Nelson, Meier, Ehlers, Guentzel, Forsberg, Markstrom, Huberdeau, Barkov, Oshie, Shesterkin, Hertl, Muzzin, Nurse, Parayko, etc. A few of those players - Hertl, Meier, Forsberg - are rumored to be on the trade market as we speak. The Hurricanes could have used that first round pick (and the third) that they gave to the Canadiens to acquire KK as a package to receive one of those three. They could have spent less , and receive Kessel, who has a lot of playoff experience.

I don't want to get into this. There are always two sides, and I respect that. If you think he helps the Canes more than (insert player making less here), then great. Again, they're a contender, and I am sure that his cap hit won't hurt them during the deadline.
10 déc. 2021 à 10 h 57
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,555
Mentions "j'aime": 5,042
Quoting: markmws
GREAT! If he's producing that much, let's see him more than 7 minutes, right? I mean, why aren't they playing him more? 0.75 is production, so why only play him 7 minutes? What's he doing wrong?

I'm reading his stats as we speak. He's got a CF% of 58.6, which is great. Now, the percentage of time that he starts in the offensive zone is 67.4%. I have no issue with that: they're sheltering him, and that's great. Long term, I am not 100% sure that will help him to become a great 2-way center. It could! Nobody can be certain. If I were running the Hurricanes, I personally would not have signed him because I personally would see this season (and long-term) as a "go-for-it" season, and $6million could be used in any number of ways to improve their team.



Look, the Hurricanes are a great team. I have nothing against them or Kotkaniemi. I guess, if you are a Hurricanes fan, you have to ask yourself if Kotkaniemi, for this season, at $6 million, puts you in a better position to win a Cup then say someone else who produces at a $6 million dollar clip.

To put this into context, here is a short list of players who are making less than Kotkaniemi: Larkin, Dumba, Brodin, Nelson, Meier, Ehlers, Guentzel, Forsberg, Markstrom, Huberdeau, Barkov, Oshie, Shesterkin, Hertl, Muzzin, Nurse, Parayko, etc. A few of those players - Hertl, Meier, Forsberg - are rumored to be on the trade market as we speak. The Hurricanes could have used that first round pick (and the third) that they gave to the Canadiens to acquire KK as a package to receive one of those three. They could have spent less , and receive Kessel, who has a lot of playoff experience.

I don't want to get into this. There are always two sides, and I respect that. If you think he helps the Canes more than (insert player making less here), then great. Again, they're a contender, and I am sure that his cap hit won't hurt them during the deadline.


He plays 25% of the 5v5 TOI the team gets. It's not his fault this team has the discipline of a kid in a candy shop.

The only knock you can have on KK is that he doesn't kill penalties, but he's learning to. He's been excellent in Carolina, and suggesting he hasn't on the basis he gets 7 minutes a night when he doesn't kill penalties on the most penalized team in the NHL (and rightly so, this isn't me complaining about calls against the Canes, Carolina commit a lot of penalties) it's a lazy take.
10 déc. 2021 à 12 h 35
#10
Mark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 751
Mentions "j'aime": 323
Quoting: Caniac2000
He plays 25% of the 5v5 TOI the team gets. It's not his fault this team has the discipline of a kid in a candy shop.

The only knock you can have on KK is that he doesn't kill penalties, but he's learning to. He's been excellent in Carolina, and suggesting he hasn't on the basis he gets 7 minutes a night when he doesn't kill penalties on the most penalized team in the NHL (and rightly so, this isn't me complaining about calls against the Canes, Carolina commit a lot of penalties) it's a lazy take.


Go back and read my post. I NEVER once said he was playing poorly. What I was and still am saying is that, for a $6 million dollar cap hit, they could do better. At no point was I disparaging Kotkaniemi. I don't think it was lazy, but if you think so, then fine: think whatever you want. I am not going to loose sleep over it.

Look, I really don't care. This conversation has run it's course. Let's just agree to disagree.
10 déc. 2021 à 14 h 29
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,555
Mentions "j'aime": 5,042
Quoting: markmws
Go back and read my post. I NEVER once said he was playing poorly. What I was and still am saying is that, for a $6 million dollar cap hit, they could do better. At no point was I disparaging Kotkaniemi. I don't think it was lazy, but if you think so, then fine: think whatever you want. I am not going to loose sleep over it.

Look, I really don't care. This conversation has run it's course. Let's just agree to disagree.


Except, he's proving himself to be the 2nd best center on the team, and his 6 mil cap hit as a center is more than justified. It also has to be higher to get the player on an offersheet, and they have him cost controlled for term.... he's been great, and your take is incredibly lazy. Watch some Canes games and I promise you that you'll see why KK is worth it.
11 déc. 2021 à 2 h 18
#12
Mark
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 751
Mentions "j'aime": 323
Quoting: Caniac2000
Except, he's proving himself to be the 2nd best center on the team, and his 6 mil cap hit as a center is more than justified. It also has to be higher to get the player on an offersheet, and they have him cost controlled for term.... he's been great, and your take is incredibly lazy. Watch some Canes games and I promise you that you'll see why KK is worth it.


Again, I NEVER said that he's not a good player. Go back and read everything. I'm not calling your posts names or calling what your writing names: everyone is entitled to their opinions. If he's there 2nd best center, then I'll look forward to future games where he plays over 10 minutes consistently.

Agree to disagree on this.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage