SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Positive deadline

Créé par: AllJonedOut
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 17 nov. 2021
Publié: 17 nov. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Go get a A+ leader in the locker room. Who is a playoff warrior. Would complete our top 9 into a very competitive group.

Personally think this team lines up really well against a lot of teams. Who knows if we can go deep. But a hot goaltending and a deep lineup is a start to make that happen.

Also how good has Mario been this year. Holy crap his two way game has been outstanding. Would love to see him maybe push for 40 points next to burns
Transactions
SJS
  1. Pavelski, Joe (2 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de DAL
Logo de SJS
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $67 685 834 $0 $295 000 $13 814 166 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
500 000 $500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
796 667 $796 667 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 nov. 2021 à 1 h 39
#1
tiktok- sharksmafia
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 204
Mentions "j'aime": 98
If Dallas is out of a playoff spot then I think this is a good deal.

Totally agree w/ you, I’ve loved Ferraro so far. Will definitely have to get a Jersey of his soon.
AllJonedOut a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2021 à 2 h 53
#2
STL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,622
Mentions "j'aime": 1,639
But Kane isn't on LTIR. You have to play him.
17 nov. 2021 à 6 h 23
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 2,733
Pavs with retention will prolly cost around a first and a third assuming we’re out of the playoffs
EsoYeezus69 et WallStreet83 a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2021 à 8 h 47
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 41,277
Mentions "j'aime": 18,766
I think a contender would pay a late 1st for Pavelski. Tricky part could be getting him to waive for those teams.
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2021 à 10 h 44
#5
Démarrer sujet
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: jwg314
But Kane isn't on LTIR. You have to play him.


Do whatever you have too. He doesn’t play another game for SJ
17 nov. 2021 à 10 h 46
#6
Démarrer sujet
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Pavs with retention will prolly cost around a first and a third assuming we’re out of the playoffs


Quoting: NHLfan10506
I think a contender would pay a late 1st for Pavelski. Tricky part could be getting him to waive for those teams.


Personally think a first is a high price. Pavs is awesome player. Don’t get me wrong. But he is up there in age and most likely isn’t a 30 goal scorer again. I think for a rental. A second is the sweet spot.
17 nov. 2021 à 11 h 19
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 2,733
Quoting: AllJonedOut
Personally think a first is a high price. Pavs is awesome player. Don’t get me wrong. But he is up there in age and most likely isn’t a 30 goal scorer again. I think for a rental. A second is the sweet spot.


Zucc got two second round picks. Both had conditions to be a first. Pavs is worth an unconditional first. The third being for salary retention. If you think a first is high that’s fair. But if it comes time and we’re sellers, there’s multiple playoff teams that might consider it doable. And to be fair again, I’m glad to see SJ playing well but I don’t think the first rounder should be on the table for them
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
17 nov. 2021 à 11 h 25
#8
Démarrer sujet
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Zucc got two second round picks. Both had conditions to be a first. Pavs is worth an unconditional first. The third being for salary retention. If you think a first is high that’s fair. But if it comes time and we’re sellers, there’s multiple playoff teams that might consider it doable. And to be fair again, I’m glad to see SJ playing well but I don’t think the first rounder should be on the table for them


Agreed. No way SJ parts with a first. I would be open to a second and a conditional 3rd like if he resigns or if we make it to the finals. Something like that. Also the TDL market is really hard to predict this far in advance,
17 nov. 2021 à 11 h 59
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 2,733
Quoting: AllJonedOut
Agreed. No way SJ parts with a first. I would be open to a second and a conditional 3rd like if he resigns or if we make it to the finals. Something like that. Also the TDL market is really hard to predict this far in advance,


I don’t think they can do the if he re signs condition any more. And I feel like the second and a third offer gets topped by another team
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage