SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

part 1 Best case scenario this season

Créé par: Rob32sjsharks
Équipe: 2021-22 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 5 oct. 2021
Publié: 6 oct. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
it’s time to rebuild!
Trading Hertl sucks... it just does, but it’s a necessary evil. I saw a form of this trade on a Rangers post and I want to run with it, Meier could be deadly in that rangers lineup and adds a little grit as well, but with Leonard Dahlin and Eklund we have too many quality LW and losing Meier wont hurt us much.
I think Hertl is a better fit for the rangers than Eichel, both cap wise and what they have to give up to get each player.
This makes the rangers a team that could compete offensively with any team in their division.
now and I only assume this works with an extension in place.
on the flip side this gives the sharks 2 players that fill holes now and in the future, Strome would be our top RW we desperately need and Chytil will be a weaker 2C now and in the future should be a stud 2c!
the rest of the trades are deadline deals we set up as we see the season slip away.
this should set us up with a top 7 pick again and hopefully we can land another playmaker like Eklund.
my hope is for a lousy season where a few top guys miss time and we sink to the bottom of the NHL. A playoff run or fight for playoff spot only weakens our future at this point.
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Chytil, Filip
  2. Strome, Ryan
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
4.
SJS
    Team TBD just a d depth player for any team in need
    5.
    SJS
    1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (WSH)
    2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
    WSH
    1. Cogliano, Andrew (500 000 $ retained)
    6.
    SJS
    1. Koskinen, Mikko
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
    Détails additionnels:
    Koskinen or Smith falter and Edmonton needs a dependable goalie with some playoff experience. 3rd for Reimer upgrades to a 2nd with us taking koskinen back as a cap dump.
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de BUF
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de ARI
    Logo de MIN
    2023
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de NYR
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    2024
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    Logo de SJS
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $59 627 500 $0 $940 000 $21 872 500 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $
    AG
    RFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
    C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
    C
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    796 667 $796 667 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    2 108 696 $2 108 696 $
    AG, AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sharks de San Jose
    725 000 $725 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1

    Unités spéciales

    Avantage numérique 1
     
    Avantage numérique 2
     
    Infériorité numérique 1
    Infériorité numérique 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    6 oct. 2021 à 21 h 40
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 8,634
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
    Oilers decline because you called kosk a cap dump.
    6 oct. 2021 à 21 h 48
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 3,629
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
    Very intriguing trade for the Rangers. Doubt they would give up 2 centers, so maybe drop either Chytil or Strome and add a winger like Kravstov or a D like Jones and it could work.
    Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
    6 oct. 2021 à 21 h 50
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 3,629
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
    Quoting: Timmah007
    Oilers decline because you called kosk a cap dump.


    Calling him a cap dumb is being polite
    glarson17 et Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
    6 oct. 2021 à 21 h 58
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2020
    Messages: 5,219
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,868
    Quoting: Timmah007
    Oilers decline because you called kosk a cap dump.


    Don’t see how that’s untrue but okay.
    Devil a aimé ceci.
    6 oct. 2021 à 22 h 9
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 8,142
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,629
    Oilers need to ask more than a 2nd in that.
    6 oct. 2021 à 22 h 35
    #6
    Vegan Commie Hipster
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 7,888
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
    Given Meier's RFA status and how low the NYR picks are likely to be I honestly think that's a good offer for Meier alone (maybe a little hefty ultimately)

    SJ even was kind enough to keep his point totals low

    So he can re-signed relatively cheaply 😊
    Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
    6 oct. 2021 à 22 h 36
    #7
    Vegan Commie Hipster
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2020
    Messages: 7,888
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,256
    Quoting: Timmah007
    Oilers decline because you called kosk a cap dump.


    Do you mean in how it'd impact negotiations?
    6 oct. 2021 à 22 h 54
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 8,634
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
    Quoting: Radu47
    Do you mean in how it'd impact negotiations?


    Just disagree that kosk is seen as a cap dump.
    6 oct. 2021 à 22 h 58
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 8,634
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
    Quoting: delneggs
    Calling him a cap dumb is being polite

    How so? He’s had one down year. I don’t see how Gibson has 3 down years in a row and is still considered an elite starter but kosk has one down year with reasonable explanations but calling him a cap dump is polite?
    6 oct. 2021 à 23 h 12
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    If you are blowing it up I think you do everything you can to trade burns before he declined more and becomes untradable.

    I also think you strongly consider trading couture as I most likely he won't be worth his contract when you're trying to compete in ideally 3-4 years.

    You are stuck with Vlasic and likely EK as veterans. Try to get out from your other big contracts while you can
    6 oct. 2021 à 23 h 49
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2018
    Messages: 4,184
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,001
    Quoting: Timmah007
    Just disagree that kosk is seen as a cap dump.


    If he had value Holland would have moved him already thus he is a cap dump
    Rob32sjsharks a aimé ceci.
    7 oct. 2021 à 0 h 12
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2018
    Messages: 3,629
    Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
    Quoting: Timmah007
    How so? He’s had one down year. I don’t see how Gibson has 3 down years in a row and is still considered an elite starter but kosk has one down year with reasonable explanations but calling him a cap dump is polite?


    How does Gibson figure into this conversation? Koisk is OVERPAID and no GM would take him straight up at his cost, so he would be a cap dump. Pretty simple really.
    7 oct. 2021 à 6 h 59
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 8,634
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
    Quoting: vols94
    If he had value Holland would have moved him already thus he is a cap dump


    Maybe Holland didn’t think moving him was actually any sort of priority because he is proven very capable no sense in moving him in a sideways trade for a guy who the coach doesn’t know as well. It’s important to try and understand why a player any player had a down year in kosk case it’s pretty simple to see he didn’t have much of a chance to get in a groove.
    7 oct. 2021 à 13 h 0
    #14
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,197
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,657
    Quoting: Timmah007
    Oilers decline because you called kosk a cap dump.


    isn’t he though? he’s 4.5 mil agains the cap and hasn’t played well the last few years, getting relegated to backup for a 40 year old well travels bet isn’t a good sign!
    7 oct. 2021 à 13 h 2
    #15
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,197
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,657
    Quoting: glarson17
    Oilers need to ask more than a 2nd in that.


    Reimer is an older vet so his value is less due to the strong possibility he regresses next year and we’re only taking the cap hit of koskinen for 1/2 a year in this scenario. plus i don’t want to be a homer and over-ask for value.
    7 oct. 2021 à 13 h 7
    #16
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,197
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,657
    Quoting: Radu47
    Given Meier's RFA status and how low the NYR picks are likely to be I honestly think that's a good offer for Meier alone (maybe a little hefty ultimately)

    SJ even was kind enough to keep his point totals low

    So he can re-signed relatively cheaply 😊


    I truly hope both players flourish for NY in this scenario.
    the value might be lower than most would expect back but Strome would be a very valuable addition as he is a RH shot who would be out top line RW and Chytil could end up being very close to Hertl replacement level player in a year or two, add the picks and the idea Meier as a LW isn’t as valuable to us because of how overloaded we are on the LW i think this is fair and a big plus for both teams.
    7 oct. 2021 à 13 h 15
    #17
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 11,197
    Mentions "j'aime": 4,657
    Quoting: BCAPP
    If you are blowing it up I think you do everything you can to trade burns before he declined more and becomes untradable.

    I also think you strongly consider trading couture as I most likely he won't be worth his contract when you're trying to compete in ideally 3-4 years.

    You are stuck with Vlasic and likely EK as veterans. Try to get out from your other big contracts while you can


    these idea were in my mind as well.
    however Burns and Couture both have NTC and can crush any deal they don’t want, plus every NHL GM knows they are on the decline and their deals will be burdens in the last 2 years of each deal. my thoughts are with all the space from
    the other moves we have enough cap now to pay the kids comming up and keep the team together and allow Burns and Couture to be anchors and give solid leadership
    mentorship to the team. plus we don’t have any RD heir for Burns or any 1C heir in the system yet. so we keep both and start drafting their heir apparent with the hope in 2-3 years they can start supplanting them in the lineup.
    plus it’s never good to do a full tear down and rebuild. you need leadership and vets on teams the help the kids grow and mature and this allows the sharks to stay somewhat stable white they go through a rebuild. plus we will need these guys salaries for the next few years to stay above the cap
    floor until the kids start getting larger deals in 3-4 years
    7 oct. 2021 à 14 h 7
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2015
    Messages: 9,382
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
    Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
    these idea were in my mind as well.
    however Burns and Couture both have NTC and can crush any deal they don’t want, plus every NHL GM knows they are on the decline and their deals will be burdens in the last 2 years of each deal. my thoughts are with all the space from
    the other moves we have enough cap now to pay the kids comming up and keep the team together and allow Burns and Couture to be anchors and give solid leadership
    mentorship to the team. plus we don’t have any RD heir for Burns or any 1C heir in the system yet. so we keep both and start drafting their heir apparent with the hope in 2-3 years they can start supplanting them in the lineup.
    plus it’s never good to do a full tear down and rebuild. you need leadership and vets on teams the help the kids grow and mature and this allows the sharks to stay somewhat stable white they go through a rebuild. plus we will need these guys salaries for the next few years to stay above the cap
    floor until the kids start getting larger deals in 3-4 years


    Thats a fair analysis. I just think with being stuck with Vlasic and likely EK you should try to get out of burns and couture could still give you value.

    For example I think Minnesota/NYR could both really like him if they want to go less expensive than Eichel.
    7 oct. 2021 à 14 h 10
    #19
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2020
    Messages: 8,634
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
    Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
    isn’t he though? he’s 4.5 mil agains the cap and hasn’t played well the last few years, getting relegated to backup for a 40 year old well travels bet isn’t a good sign!


    Last season was rough for him but that’s understandable considering he had to play every game until smith joined the team that was an incredible amount to ask of any goalie. He was then made the back up for smith the rest of the way but that’s in large part because smith played out of his mind good. Can’t hold it against kosk that smith went into beast mode. Just the season before kosk put up very similar numbers to markstrom who got a bigger payday than kosk current deal. I just don’t agree he’s overpaid he does what’s expected of for his cap hit he might be considered the “back up” and that is a lot to pay a back up but he’s going to play 35-40 games if smith stays healthy more possibly a lot more if smith doesn’t stay healthy.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage