SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hamonic replacement

Créé par: The_Rocket
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 28 sept. 2021
Publié: 28 sept. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
88 000 000 $
58 000 000 $
Transactions
MTL
  1. Juolevi, Olli
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Trade done after Joulevi clears waivers. Keeps LD depth for Montreal in the minors
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 810 659 $648 780 $3 400 000 $3 689 341 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 500 000 $$2M)
G
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 sept. 2021 à 15 h 17
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,896
Mentions "j'aime": 6,396
I'd rather have the cap space to sign Pettersson long term. Just gonna have to go with Schenn
28 sept. 2021 à 15 h 20
#2
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 13,144
Mentions "j'aime": 10,516
Assuming that Niku and Wideman both prove to be full-time NHL capable, I wouldn’t dislike this at all.
RobbStark03 et Billy739 a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2021 à 16 h 7
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2016
Messages: 73
Mentions "j'aime": 28
deal
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2021 à 16 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 520
Mentions "j'aime": 246
I doubt Juolevi clears waivers.
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2021 à 18 h 7
#5
Démarrer sujet
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,980
Mentions "j'aime": 3,589
Quoting: RagBolts
I doubt Juolevi clears waivers.


Then upgrade the pick to a 4th if that’s the case
28 sept. 2021 à 18 h 7
#6
Démarrer sujet
Judd Bracket ripoff
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,980
Mentions "j'aime": 3,589
Quoting: TheAlien
I'd rather have the cap space to sign Pettersson long term. Just gonna have to go with Schenn


Fair enough. But with keeper breaking his leg and hamonic possibly sitting out the season, D depth took a real hit. I think we could use one more bonafied NHL d-man
28 sept. 2021 à 18 h 46
#7
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
Quoting: The_Rocket
Then upgrade the pick to a 4th if that’s the case


That works. We only trade Kulak if he becomes expendable, and if he's expendable it's because we already have enough D above him in the depth chart.
Doubt Juolevi clears anyway.
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2021 à 19 h 44
#8
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: ricochetii
That works. We only trade Kulak if he becomes expendable, and if he's expendable it's because we already have enough D above him in the depth chart.
Doubt Juolevi clears anyway.


i dunno if im MTL upgrading the 7th D with a player in a similar position to Kulak when we got him makes sense.
He's a big bodied guy who can learn a lot from Shea Weber who's remaining on from the sidelines to help the the team
This year Juolevi would get special attention that normally a 7th D doesnt

It gives us Cap space which is more valuable then Kulaks upside
We brought in Chiarot and Edmundston because he failed to step up and take the job
he's a good bottom pair/7th D capable of 16-18 minutes but after that it gets sketchy and turnovers become a thing

Juolevi might not get any better
But we know Kulaks not getting a new deal with all the LD we got coming up in the next year
We could turn Juolevi into another Morrow rebuilding value then flipping him for a pick
28 sept. 2021 à 21 h 0
#9
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 10,667
Mentions "j'aime": 4,091
Quoting: Billy739
i dunno if im MTL upgrading the 7th D with a player in a similar position to Kulak when we got him makes sense.
He's a big bodied guy who can learn a lot from Shea Weber who's remaining on from the sidelines to help the the team
This year Juolevi would get special attention that normally a 7th D doesnt

It gives us Cap space which is more valuable then Kulaks upside
We brought in Chiarot and Edmundston because he failed to step up and take the job
he's a good bottom pair/7th D capable of 16-18 minutes but after that it gets sketchy and turnovers become a thing

Juolevi might not get any better
But we know Kulaks not getting a new deal with all the LD we got coming up in the next year
We could turn Juolevi into another Morrow rebuilding value then flipping him for a pick


Kulak's a reliable 7th and can sub in the top 4 in a pinch. It's hard to give up a good insurance policy for a questionable return. The cap space is secondary.
I think he'd need to drop to 8th to even consider it. That means at least two players need to prove they are better options first.
If Kulak would clear waivers, I'd even keep him then, but that's doubtful.

Juolevi is a good risk/reward opportunity, I just don't think it's the right move for us at this time.
1 oct. 2021 à 17 h 5
#10
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: ricochetii
Kulak's a reliable 7th and can sub in the top 4 in a pinch. It's hard to give up a good insurance policy for a questionable return. The cap space is secondary.
I think he'd need to drop to 8th to even consider it. That means at least two players need to prove they are better options first.
If Kulak would clear waivers, I'd even keep him then, but that's doubtful.

Juolevi is a good risk/reward opportunity, I just don't think it's the right move for us at this time.


His waiver cap hit is the same as NHL
I dont see how that would help

Reliable 7th D are less important then you think
Can you remember our 7th D from 2014? or 2010?
A Reliable #5 D like Emelin is what we need and what we were missing last year.
Weber/Petry/Chiarot and Eddy had to play 21-25 minutes a night rotating with Merril/Gus
All because they couldnt trust our bottom pair who had no leader

The fact we couldnt trust him in the SC playoffs speaks volume's to how Coach Ducharme views him different then Claude Julien.
Ducharme relied on Merril and Gustafsson over Kulak. Under DD we also so the decline of Kulak and rise of Romanov

Each coach choose their guy
It appears Chris Wideman for Ducharme as he offers more offensive upside and best of all Half Kulaks career turnovers with more points in less games.
Wideman Defensively isnt as good as Kulak but he's not that much worse(the difference is so small vs the upside its really a non factor)
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage