SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

oilers adding off season

Créé par: KeepUps15
Équipe: 2021-22 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 5 août 2021
Publié: 5 août 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
NYR
  1. Koskinen, Mikko (1 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
2.
NSH
  1. Klefbom, Oscar
  2. Lavoie, Raphael
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
2023 2nd becomes a 1st if Ekholm re signs
3.
EDM
    any team for f.c
    Rachats de contrats
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2023
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    2024
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de EDM
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2181 500 000 $81 271 968 $669 339 $907 500 $228 032 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
    AG, C
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 2
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    834 167 $834 167 $ (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Rangers de New York
    2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Predators de Nashville
    3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    5 août 2021 à 14 h 35
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 10,264
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,129
    Klefbom is probably done, so NSH isn't just taking on a contract like that to sit on LTIR for nothing.
    5 août 2021 à 14 h 48
    #2
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 24,087
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,771
    Massive overpay for Georgiev. He's a downgrade on Koskinen, I'm not sure why you think it's worth a 1st to get worse goaltending and save just $500k.
    5 août 2021 à 14 h 58
    #3
    Am Yisrael Chai
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2018
    Messages: 18,652
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,758
    Quoting: CD282
    Massive overpay for Georgiev. He's a downgrade on Koskinen, I'm not sure why you think it's worth a 1st to get worse goaltending and save just $500k.


    oh boy
    yycofred et KeepUps15 a aimé ceci.
    5 août 2021 à 15 h 18
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 523
    Mentions "j'aime": 99
    Quoting: CD282
    Massive overpay for Georgiev. He's a downgrade on Koskinen, I'm not sure why you think it's worth a 1st to get worse goaltending and save just $500k.


    I am not too sure about him being a downgrade, but it most definitely is a massive overpay.

    Not to mention that the Rangers are moving Georgiev to shed his money, Koskinen would cost more even with the retention.
    6 août 2021 à 8 h 44
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 24,087
    Mentions "j'aime": 7,771
    Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
    oh boy


    Quoting: SuprDave45
    I am not too sure about him being a downgrade, but it most definitely is a massive overpay.

    Not to mention that the Rangers are moving Georgiev to shed his money, Koskinen would cost more even with the retention.


    Over the past 2 years, Koskinen posted a .910 save percentage to Georgiev's .908. And Koskinen's mark was dragged down by the beginning of 20-21 when Smith was injured and Holland screwed up the backup situation repeatedly, and it meant the that Koskinen had to play every game of a wicked schedule - 12 games in 24 nights traveling thousands of miles through 4 timezones - which isn't something ANY goalie can stand up under. It wasn't fair to Koskinen but Tippett had little choice but to keep throwing him over the boards, so his results were poor over that stretch. I don't fault Koskinen for that, he did his best in an impossible situation.

    If you pull those 12 games out of the equation to get a look at how he performs under normal circumstances, his save percentage over the past two seasons is .916, well above Georgiev's .908.

    And before you blame NYR's defense, know that Koskinen faced 32.60 shots/60 to Georgiev's 31.99 SA/60 in all situations, and 32.34 SA/60 vs Georgiev's 31.03 at 5v5. Its not quality of shots either, as Koskinen has faced 8.50 HDSA/60 while Georgiev has faced 7.46.

    So while Georgiev has some upside due to being just 25, in the short term I see this trade as a downgrade for Edmonton.
    11 août 2021 à 15 h 35
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2017
    Messages: 523
    Mentions "j'aime": 99
    Quoting: CD282
    Over the past 2 years, Koskinen posted a .910 save percentage to Georgiev's .908. And Koskinen's mark was dragged down by the beginning of 20-21 when Smith was injured and Holland screwed up the backup situation repeatedly, and it meant the that Koskinen had to play every game of a wicked schedule - 12 games in 24 nights traveling thousands of miles through 4 timezones - which isn't something ANY goalie can stand up under. It wasn't fair to Koskinen but Tippett had little choice but to keep throwing him over the boards, so his results were poor over that stretch. I don't fault Koskinen for that, he did his best in an impossible situation.

    If you pull those 12 games out of the equation to get a look at how he performs under normal circumstances, his save percentage over the past two seasons is .916, well above Georgiev's .908.

    And before you blame NYR's defense, know that Koskinen faced 32.60 shots/60 to Georgiev's 31.99 SA/60 in all situations, and 32.34 SA/60 vs Georgiev's 31.03 at 5v5. Its not quality of shots either, as Koskinen has faced 8.50 HDSA/60 while Georgiev has faced 7.46.

    So while Georgiev has some upside due to being just 25, in the short term I see this trade as a downgrade for Edmonton.


    Not sure why I'm being quoted in this, I'm on your side! lol
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage