SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Whats right

Créé par: HatterTParty
Équipe: 2021-22 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 27 juill. 2021
Publié: 27 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Logically, give him what he wants and deserves. Plus, clearing out the trash.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Pettersson, Marcus
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Fleury, Marc-André (3 500 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
2.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (SEA)
SEA
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Nylander, Alexander [Droits de RFA]
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de EDM
Logo de VGK
Logo de SEA
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CHI
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $75 905 222 $452 439 $4 232 500 $5 594 778 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 700 000 $3 700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
912 500 $912 500 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
997 500 $997 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 juill. 2021 à 13 h 45
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,169
Mentions "j'aime": 258
Pens would do this I think
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2021 à 13 h 49
#2
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,861
Mentions "j'aime": 10,103
I don't want MP though. I'm more than willing to send Flower to PIT. Just prefer something different.
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 6
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: exo2769
I don't want MP though. I'm more than willing to send Flower to PIT. Just prefer something different.


I considered half retention for Pittsburgh’s 1st next year, but I think we both know they’d probably never do that.
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 11
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
I only think the Pens do this if you remove the 2nd. Hextall is being VERY tight with the Pens picks and it would take a crazy deal for him to move a 2nd or 1st, but I also don't think CHI is going to have much leverage here.
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 19
#5
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,861
Mentions "j'aime": 10,103
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I only think the Pens do this if you remove the 2nd. Hextall is being VERY tight with the Pens picks and it would take a crazy deal for him to move a 2nd or 1st, but I also don't think CHI is going to have much leverage here.


What's the logic behind no leverage? Hawks can easily retain 50% and have 20 teams lined up for the current vezina winner. Maybe it's TOR? Maybe it's VAN? Maybe it's CAR?
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 25
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: exo2769
What's the logic behind no leverage? Hawks can easily retain 50% and have 20 teams lined up for the current vezina winner. Maybe it's TOR? Maybe it's VAN? Maybe it's CAR?


Hawks will have to retain 50% is what I mean by leverage. Nobody is taking that full contract. Teams won't feel they have to sweeten the pot. Pettersson is a good dman. Him straight up for MAF at 50% would be fair given the situation. It may be different if there was more than one year left on MAF's deal, but you only have to eat for one.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 31
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Hawks will have to retain 50% is what I mean by leverage. Nobody is taking that full contract. Teams won't feel they have to sweeten the pot. Pettersson is a good dman. Him straight up for MAF at 50% would be fair given the situation. It may be different if there was more than one year left on MAF's deal, but you only have to eat for one.


You forget though, even with just one year left, teams like Pittsburgh who will always go for it with crosby and malkin around will always do what they can to compete. One year of the defending vezina winner? That’s worth more than pettersson no questions asked. Respectfully.
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 35
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: HatterTParty
You forget though, even with just one year left, teams like Pittsburgh who will always go for it with crosby and malkin around will always do what they can to compete. One year of the defending vezina winner? That’s worth more than pettersson no questions asked. Respectfully.


Rutherford is not our GM anymore lol. Pens would not make this trade. Hextall has been very transparent on moving any picks or prospects and this does not fall under the type of deal it would take.
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 40
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Rutherford is not our GM anymore lol. Pens would not make this trade. Hextall has been very transparent on moving any picks or prospects and this does not fall under the type of deal it would take.


If that’s the case though, why trade for Jeff carter? I agree Rutherford would have jumped at this, but Hextall has shown he wants the pens to stay competitive.
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 47
#10
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,861
Mentions "j'aime": 10,103
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Hawks will have to retain 50% is what I mean by leverage. Nobody is taking that full contract. Teams won't feel they have to sweeten the pot. Pettersson is a good dman. Him straight up for MAF at 50% would be fair given the situation. It may be different if there was more than one year left on MAF's deal, but you only have to eat for one.


I'm not interested in Pettersson. Hawks have enough of those guys, but I would be interested in Poulin plus a pick smile
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 58
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: HatterTParty
If that’s the case though, why trade for Jeff carter? I agree Rutherford would have jumped at this, but Hextall has shown he wants the pens to stay competitive.


That was the one move apparently. Hextall has come out since about not moving picks or prospects except for a big deal.
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 59
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: exo2769
I'm not interested in Pettersson. Hawks have enough of those guys, but I would be interested in Poulin plus a pick smile


Oh, I don't blame you. I don't see the room for him. I'm just going by the proposed trade in this AGM.
27 juill. 2021 à 15 h 6
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Oh, I don't blame you. I don't see the room for him. I'm just going by the proposed trade in this AGM.


No room for poulin?? I’d love that guy!
27 juill. 2021 à 15 h 9
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: HatterTParty
No room for poulin?? I’d love that guy!


Haha no, for Pettersson. Honestly, Poulin is a not a great prospect.
27 juill. 2021 à 16 h 9
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,351
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Haha no, for Pettersson. Honestly, Poulin is a not a great prospect.


For real?! What’s your take on him?
28 juill. 2021 à 12 h 9
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: HatterTParty
For real?! What’s your take on him?


It's really hard to tell on him. He's got the goods, size, can skate and pass, but just unclear if he'll be able to keep up at the pro level. He looked lost in last year's camp, didn't make team canada and put up mediocre numbers this past season in the Q. At his age he should be destroying the Q.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage