SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

how the Leafs win the cup

Créé par: ye_
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 27 juill. 2021
Publié: 27 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
the leafs need a true number 1 defenseman and Hamilton fits that mold. also do The Leafs basically have 2 first lines now which few teams can match. if you shutdown the Matthews line you still have the Dvorak Tavares Marner line to worry about. the leafs also have a fast third line with a wildcard in robertson. Spezza and Crouse will also provide depth scoring. The Leafs also have a capable third line center who is great defensively and can win a important draw. tell me if you think this team is good enough to win it all. LETSGO LEAFS!!!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 850 000 $
21 250 000 $
41 350 000 $
2950 000 $
31 800 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Helenius, Samuel [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Kings need a mobile LD, Rielly will come with an extension. comparible dman Ristolainen got a similar return.
2.
ARI
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. Kerfoot, Alexander
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
Détails additionnels:
Yotes get kerfoot who only makes 750k this year what would make sense for a team with a internal cap hit. also first round pick of kings holds a lot of value since it will be a high pick
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Mikheyev, Ilya
Détails additionnels:
Oilers desperately a RD who can play in the top 4. also Mikheyev who is a good winger put Leafs need every dollar they can get to make this work
4.
STL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de EDM
Logo de TOR
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $81 243 116 $0 $400 000 $256 884 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 3
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 533 333 $1 533 333 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
8 850 000 $8 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
825 000 $825 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
UFA - 1
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 juill. 2021 à 13 h 44
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,570
Mentions "j'aime": 6,152
The real downside of the Ristolainen trade. People around these parts will start using that awful decision as a comparable.

Just because Chuck Fletcher is a moron doesn't make Rob Blake one too.
27 juill. 2021 à 13 h 49
#2
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 129
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: tkecanuck341
The real downside of the Ristolainen trade. People around these parts will start using that awful decision as a comparable.

Just because Chuck Fletcher is a moron doesn't make Rob Blake one too.


What about the Jones trade than? Rielly and Jones are comparable dman who both have only 1 year left on their deals. and the hawks gave up two firsts and underrated Boqvist. only difference is that Jones came off a terrible year and Rielly had a good playoffs with the leafs.
27 juill. 2021 à 13 h 52
#3
The right to Wright
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 188
As an Oilers fan I approve, Good deal. Splitting Marner and Matthews is crucial and you understand that. Marner making 11m must be able to drive his own line. You gotta do that when making 10m+. Also the 3rd and 4th lind are both interesting in their own way. Top 6 is really good. If we could get secondary scoring we could maybe match you but atm you got 2 great lines. if this team doesn't win a 1st round what will? Great job overall!
ye_ a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2021 à 13 h 52
#4
The right to Wright
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 188
Also love me some Hamilton passing the puck up to Marner and Matthews
27 juill. 2021 à 13 h 52
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,478
Mentions "j'aime": 4,511
Quoting: ye_
What about the Jones trade than? Rielly and Jones are comparable dman who both have only 1 year left on their deals. and the hawks gave up two firsts and underrated Boqvist. only difference is that Jones came off a terrible year and Rielly had a good playoffs with the leafs.


That was also a sign and trade, the payment seems to show that the Blackhawks believe Jones is one of the best defensemen in the entire league who just had an off year. Reilly if not given a hometown discount (and likely a NTC) will test the free market next season. Which means the Kings would be paying a 1st (potential top 10), recent 2nd round pick and a 4th for a one year rental. No way they do that.
27 juill. 2021 à 13 h 52
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,570
Mentions "j'aime": 6,152
Quoting: ye_
What about the Jones trade than? Rielly and Jones are comparable dman who both have only 1 year left on their deals. and the hawks gave up two firsts and underrated Boqvist. only difference is that Jones came off a terrible year and Rielly had a good playoffs with the leafs.


LA will not give up a 1st round pick for Morgan Rielly. LA is looking for a puck-moving LHD age 25 and under. People conveniently leave that part out when authoring trades.

Quoting: Dreger
“Rob Blake of the Los Angeles Kings is looking for a defenseman in the category 25 and under. He specifically wants a dynamic, left-shot defenseman."


Here's the segment on TSN if you want to watch it.

https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/video/~2148491
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 1
#7
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 129
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: tryger
That was also a sign and trade, the payment seems to show that the Blackhawks believe Jones is one of the best defensemen in the entire league who just had an off year. Reilly if not given a hometown discount (and likely a NTC) will test the free market next season. Which means the Kings would be paying a 1st (potential top 10), recent 2nd round pick and a 4th for a one year rental. No way they do that.


what kind of return would you be willing to gave up for Rielly? Maybe its a outlier but he also has only 1 year left and I would argue Rielly is way better than him. Also dont you guys need a LD?
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 3
#8
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 129
Mentions "j'aime": 15
Quoting: ye_
what kind of return would you be willing to gave up for Rielly? Maybe its a outlier but he also has only 1 year left and I would argue Rielly is way better than him. Also dont you guys need a LD?


I am referring to Ristolainen to be clear*
27 juill. 2021 à 14 h 13
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,478
Mentions "j'aime": 4,511
Quoting: ye_
what kind of return would you be willing to gave up for Rielly? Maybe its a outlier but he also has only 1 year left and I would argue Rielly is way better than him. Also dont you guys need a LD?


The Kings had a rookie play on the top pair last year and he only got better as the season went on, they want a top LD but not a rental, think Werenski level player who is an RFA at contract end. That is a player who they would give up a 1st, a great prospect, and supplemental picks. The Kings can just overpay to get a placeholder free agent LD for one year and take their shot at Reilly then.
MNKingsFan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage