SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Progressive moves

Créé par: GMBB
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 15 juill. 2021
Publié: 15 juill. 2021
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Balanced top 3 lines.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
45 500 000 $
37 000 000 $
32 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
2750 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [Droits de RFA]
CHI
  1. Bowey, Madison
  2. Lind, Kole [Droits de RFA]
2.
3.
4.
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VAN)
5.
MIN
  1. Roussel, Antoine
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $74 690 659 $648 780 $1 050 000 $6 809 341 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 940 000 $2 940 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 225 000 $1 225 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 juill. 2021 à 11 h 46
#1
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,868
Mentions "j'aime": 5,857
Zadorov isn't going to sign for that amount and I'm not sure Chicago does that trade.
15 juill. 2021 à 11 h 48
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 831
Mentions "j'aime": 88
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Zadorov isn't going to sign for that amount and I'm not sure Chicago does that trade.


What you think he’s valuing himself at? Saw Carlo’s price so based it off that one.
15 juill. 2021 à 11 h 51
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,675
Mentions "j'aime": 1,920
Schmidty too spendy. Greenway could be moved but we can’t take on that cap hit with the buyout penalties ratcheting up soon.
15 juill. 2021 à 11 h 57
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 831
Mentions "j'aime": 88
Quoting: drmantalban
Schmidty too spendy. Greenway could be moved but we can’t take on that cap hit with the buyout penalties ratcheting up soon.


Didn’t realize they were that extreme in years 2,3,4 of buyout.
What about salary retention? Or possibly swapping him for a cheaper piece and a pick?
jnowariak et MNCountryClub a aimé ceci.
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 0
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: GMBB
Didn’t realize they were that extreme in years 2,3,4 of buyout.
What about salary retention? Or possibly swapping him for a cheaper piece and a pick?


Schmidt isn’t a fit for MIN, even without considering the contract. If you’re after Greenway, he’s available for likely the same return Kunin got. That’s a couple mil in salary on a serviceable bottom 6 player and a 2nd and 3rd/4th.

Addendum: Holtby could be considered as the player if Kaapo gets taken.
MNCountryClub et GMBB a aimé ceci.
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 5
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 831
Mentions "j'aime": 88
Quoting: jnowariak
Schmidt isn’t a fit for MIN, even without considering the contract. If you’re after Greenway, he’s available for likely the same return Kunin got. That’s a couple mil in salary on a serviceable bottom 6 player and a 2nd and 3rd/4th.

Addendum: Holtby could be considered as the player if Kaapo gets taken.


I’ll adjust accordingly. And see how it works out.
jnowariak a aimé ceci.
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 5
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,675
Mentions "j'aime": 1,920
Quoting: GMBB
Didn’t realize they were that extreme in years 2,3,4 of buyout.
What about salary retention? Or possibly swapping him for a cheaper piece and a pick?


Quoting: jnowariak
Schmidt isn’t a fit for MIN, even without considering the contract. If you’re after Greenway, he’s available for likely the same return Kunin got. That’s a couple mil in salary on a serviceable bottom 6 player and a 2nd and 3rd/4th.


Yeah I don’t see anyway Schmidt works in MIN. Agree on the Greenway valuation. IMO, if someone offered a 1st + decent prospect, MIN would instant accept. But I don’t think anyone pays that for Greener, so it’s settles on 2nd + good prospect or 2nd + cheap depth player. And then it’s kind of a yes/no depending on the prospect/player.
jnowariak a aimé ceci.
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 7
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: GMBB
I’ll adjust accordingly. And see how it works out.


Yeah, I don’t think we’re in a rush to move him but I don’t see him on the roster year after next. He’s a good complimentary piece but he’s big and GMs value that.
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 10
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: drmantalban
Yeah I don’t see anyway Schmidt works in MIN. Agree on the Greenway valuation. IMO, if someone offered a 1st + decent prospect, MIN would instant accept. But I don’t think anyone pays that for Greener, so it’s settles on 2nd + good prospect or 2nd + cheap depth player. And then it’s kind of a yes/no depending on the prospect/player.


I personally think a 1st is too much, but yes, they take that instantly if it’s on the table. He’s essentially worth a 2nd plus and salary to equalize.
MNCountryClub a aimé ceci.
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,675
Mentions "j'aime": 1,920
Quoting: jnowariak
I personally think a 1st is too much, but yes, they take that instantly if it’s on the table. He’s essentially worth a 2nd plus and salary to equalize.


1st is definitely too much. I don’t think there’s anyway he’d return that.
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 15
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 831
Mentions "j'aime": 88
Quoting: jnowariak
Yeah, I don’t think we’re in a rush to move him but I don’t see him on the roster year after next. He’s a good complimentary piece but he’s big and GMs value that.


Quoting: drmantalban
1st is definitely too much. I don’t think there’s anyway he’d return that.


Juggled some pieces around. Basically what I get from this is Pearson (similar price point) and Gadjovic (former recent 2nd rounder).
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 15
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: drmantalban
1st is definitely too much. I don’t think there’s anyway he’d return that.


I think he fits the MTL play style and Bergevin seems like he would value that. If you did MTL 1st and 2nd and included the MIN 2nd you might have something. Don’t forget the NSH 2nd we got last year was #37 and the VAN 2nd this year is #40. Those picks aren’t very far removed from each other.
15 juill. 2021 à 12 h 18
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
Quoting: GMBB
Juggled some pieces around. Basically what I get from this is Pearson (similar price point) and Gadjovic (former recent 2nd rounder).


I think they’d want the actual 2nd. And as for Pearson, that’s a 3 year commitment. And one Benning likely doesn’t want to move.

The salary equalization thing is to make the cap fit. I would look at Roussel or Holtby in this scenario. Both have 1 year left and the cap difference is no more than 2 mil.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage